Would You Consider This a Good Marriage?

[insidethe8thpol]

When the focus of emphasis changes from that which I intended, I feel that I need to point it out.
In the post to which BW made, he alluded to the word "slave"-this has nothing to do with slavery and has nothing to do with what was stated in my original post.
In looking back at what I originally posted, I made no reference to the fact that Rosa, the lady I married, is a devout Evangelical Christian, and I knew that before I married her.
Thus, the question I asked without the allusion to religion is not a real fair one for anyone to answer in the way in which it was posed regarding the opinion of my marriage;this is because the mindset of a true Evangelical Christian in marrying someone has ZERO to do with money.
I probably should have specified in my original thread and premise that for the sake of example lets assume that my wife was not the religious person I knew her to be and then went in with on with the question.
I sure hope above makes sense.

It doesnt make sense because I'm to stupid to think otherwise
Everytime you are called on a specific rant of yours, you always come back with a revised question of: "what I meant to say" and "does this make more sense to you"; implying that we are none to bright

[savage1]

No you don't. You like to disagree with every one of them and tell them they are wrong or missing the point. Maybe they made their point and YOU missed it?

Wayne, in all due respect I don't tell anyone they are wrong without my having something to back it up.
I have asked you a number of times to answer questions pertinent to my arguments such as why baseball teams seeking players outside of the US is ok but it is not ok for me to seek a wife outside of the US and why it is ok for you to research your GOY's before putting one our but not ok for me to research a WFL(wife for life).
Should I remind you that you never answered the questions directly but merely generalized and said there was no comparison and instead called me a whack job-is that what you call being polite?
In addition and as stated many times, I made relevant points in post 149 and in other places relative to the cat/condo argument-you never addressed them relative to MY specific situation and circumstances but instead argued in terms in general of what existed at yiur condo-there is a big difference between the two.
We will never agree on this:
You see me as someone who feels who is always right, whereas I see you in the same way and to be blunt a bunch of guys who will back you in anything you say.
I revealed a lot today in three posts showing some of my weaknesses in the past and future re:gambling(I assume you read them);I am not above reproach for anything.
The cat/condo thread is closed, meaning it is a dead issue.
Overall I think it is kind of pointless to argue to tell you the truth;as stated you think that I am pigheaded and won't ever admit to being wrong, whereas I think of you in the same light-thats not an insult-it is reality.

[savage1]

It doesnt make sense because I'm to stupid to think otherwise
Everytime you are called on a specific rant of yours, you always come back with a revised question of: "what I meant to say" and "does this make more sense to you"; implying that we are none to bright

You are making inferences that are simply not true.
Just like you, I express myself in a certain way;if that is not too your liking, it is your problem and not mine.

[wayne1218]

savage, You have probably asked me 100 questions that i have not answered. It is probably because i simply don't read your novels. I read a line or 2 and respond. The rest is BLAH,BLAH,BLAH,BLAH to me.

I asked you a question about jt too and you didn't answer. Why? It was short and to the point. Where is your answer buddy, i'm still very curious?

[savage1]

savage, You have probably asked me 100 questions that i have not answered. It is probably because i simply don't read your novels. I read a line or 2 and respond. The rest is BLAH,BLAH,BLAH,BLAH to me.

I asked you a question about jt too and you didn't answer. Why? It was short and to the point. Where is your answer buddy, i'm still very curious?

Pose the question you want me to answer about JT and ask it very specifically and clearly, and I will give you my response.
ps In return how about being fair and giving me YOUR response regarding the GOY research and why specifically it is different from my "researching" finding a great wife and then an answer as to why it is ok for baseball teams to seek out talent in other countries, say using Ichiro as an example but NOT ok for me to use similar logic and seek a great wife outside of the US-I don't want sweeping generalizations-I want SPECIFIC answers.
Fair enough?

[vols fan]

savage, You have probably asked me 100 questions that i have not answered. It is probably because i simply don't read your novels. I read a line or 2 and respond. The rest is BLAH,BLAH,BLAH,BLAH to me.

I asked you a question about jt too and you didn't answer. Why? It was short and to the point. Where is your answer buddy, i'm still very curious?

He still hasn't answered my question about Anna Nicole Smith and "OLD RICH MAN" Mathers being a good marriage or not.Notice to the rest of the guys, when he's been proved wrong, he avoids the question

[vols fan]

I'm Savaged out boys.I feel like a waste of a human being to give someone I will never meet so much attention.Carry on Savage with your stuck up ways but ole Vols fan is out.Enjoy the time you have with your wife and baby and if you think your a rich smart guy then great for you.As of now I could care less.

[PhilJr]

Savage,

You are going on hour 12 today responding to threads as well as what you said responding to other forums. Take some time to spend with what you paid for. I hope you paid by the hour as you certainly would be getting your moneys worth.

[BigWeiner]

I read your thread, it was weird, so I'm assuming your situation is weird. I'm not gonna get into anymore. It sounds like you didn't marry a women you fell in love with. Arranged marriages are a complete joke. Any religion that believes women should be sex slaves with a guy they don't even know, is sick. I'm not saying that's your belief.

[Chado1]

I realize you think of marriage as two people that are forced to live together and pretending to like each other. One person can't find someone to actually marry them for the right reasons, the other person does it because they don't wanna be poor and hungry. In my opinion that's wrong, and there's no way you can change my mind. Look, I could study what Charlie Manson was teaching, but I'll pass. Just like I'll pass on studying about people marrying for the wrong reasons.

Couldnt agree more. I find it totally disturbing what savage did to find a wife. But once again to each their own if he is looking for fake love or a forced relationship thats his own discretion..

[Chado1]

One person can't find someone to actually marry them for the right reasons, the other person does it because they don't wanna be poor and hungry.

OMFG I cant stop laughing at this...

[ELJUGO]

In all due respect you are also 100% and making assumptions.
Study the Latin culture and how hey regard marriage and then study what being a devout Evangelical Christian means.
If you did this and in addition met some Colombian women especially, you might feel differently.
I was actually told by a very intelligent cultured Peruvian women with whom I used to work and a good friend for many years.
She is in fact one of the ones who suggested that I seek a Colombian lady rather than a Peruvian one because of her knowledge about their perspective of life, marriage, how they treat their husbands.
I could never be happier with my wife and marriage;I honestly believe this is the lady God wanted me to marry.

If you have all the answers and have done all the "studying" required to understand marriage with Latin women then what is the point of this thread??

In my opinion it sounds like you are hoping to hear responses that validate your reality. Of course you will disagree with that but I really don't see the point of putting this topic in a gambling forum unless you had some goal. If your goal is responses then why do you get to be the judge of what is an incorrect answer?

[savage1]

I read your thread, it was weird, so I'm assuming your situation is weird. I'm not gonna get into anymore. It sounds like you didn't marry a women you fell in love with. Arranged marriages are a complete joke. Any religion that believes women should be sex slaves with a guy they don't even know, is sick. I'm not saying that's your belief.

Four months of research does not qualify as an arranged marriage-I don't agree with those either.
The point is we wrote to each other for a while ,I went to Catagena, we both shared sinilar values, we fell in love and we have been married for almost 3 1/2 years , we have an infant son and things are going quite well-who could ask for more?.
If you guys think I started the thread with the question asked because I was worried about my own situation, you are way off.
I asked a philosophical question to get you guys to think and respond-nothing more and nothing less.
It is sort of like the old question-if there is a beautiful sunset out there in the wilderness but nobody sees it, is it still a beautiful sunset?

[savage1]

Savage,

You are going on hour 12 today responding to threads as well as what you said responding to other forums. Take some time to spend with what you paid for. I hope you paid by the hour as you certainly would be getting your moneys worth.

I guess I can assume then that YOU must have been here all of those twelve hours today to time it.

[savage1]

If you have all the answers and have done all the "studying" required to understand marriage with Latin women then what is the point of this thread??

In my opinion it sounds like you are hoping to hear responses that validate your reality. Of course you will disagree with that but I really don't see the point of putting this topic in a gambling forum unless you had some goal. If your goal is responses then why do you get to be the judge of what is an incorrect answer?

I regret that you don't get it, and to be politically correct, it was placed in the non-gambling section.
ps I just answered this in another post.
It has nothing to do with validation, or right or wrong as I stated before- it was posed only to get you guys to think.