Also BW, You don't think it makes a HUGE Difference in a players speed? Speed is HUGE in football on both sides of the ball and if someone doesn't believe it makes you much faster too, just ask Marion Jones how good it is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ortiz and Ramirez Said to Be on 2003 Doping List
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostBig difference in football BW is the intense physical play. It is 100% a HUGE Advantage in football in helping players recover and heal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BigWeiner View PostOh yea, I'm not saying it's not a huge advantage, I'm just saying that's why it's not as big a deal. Merriman did roids and hit people really hard, but that was enough for people to care.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostI'm just saying they should care. If somebody cares that much about it to let it bother them in one sport, than it should bother them in all sports. Big Papi isn't going to the hall of fame or breaking any records so by your theory, why would anyone care?
Comment
-
$60,000,000 USD of USA taxpayer money was spent on the Mitchell report to find out which baseball players have used steroids. Against the US citizens wills, congress is spending millions on a few hundred page report on steroids in baseball, forgetting the failing economy and war in Iraq.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 10DimeBry View Postyou must be on crack
Comment
-
Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz says he was told by the baseball players’ union that he tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003.
“Based on the way I lived my life I’m surprised to learn I tested positive,” the statement said. “I will find out what I tested positive for. ... Based on whatever I learn, I will share this information with the club and the public. You know me — I will not hide and I will not make excuses.”
Ortiz says he’s surprised by the news and intends to find out what drug was found in the tests that were supposed to remain anonymous.
Comment
-
Jose Canseco, whose 2005 book arguably started the cascade of revelations and an investigation into the use of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball, barely raised an eyebrow when he was told David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez are reportedly on the list of 104 players who tested positive in 2003.
"When you tell me something I didn't already know, I'll be surprised,'' Canseco told ESPN. "And I'll tell you this, Major League Baseball is going to have a big, big problem on their hands when they find out they have a Hall of Famer who's used."
Comment
-
Originally posted by ogarza View PostHaha...thats funny 10dime...i was wondering if any of the big Boston fans on here would say anything...the greats were on roids the average players were on roids the batters on roids the pitchers on roids...it was an even playing field for the most part...just a bummer that this era will be remembered for that instead of the great play on the field...2013 NCAA POD Record
8-3ATS +3.80 units
2013 NFL POD Record
1-2 ATS -4.50 units
Comment
-
i don't blame any of these guys for using, which has been my stance the whole time. if they weren't being tested for it at the time, and no policy was in place, i can't fault anyone for doing it. not saying its right though.
and this whole thing today helps prove my point that the mitchell report was a complete joke.
so glad some sox are finally getting outed. must have been nice to have friends in high places, ya know since mitchell sits on the sox board of directors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BigWeiner View PostIf he was told in 2003, why is he curious what he tested for now?
You know-it saddens me a lot when I hear of any athelete using drugs but perhaps even more so with Ortiz.
Here until now we had a guy who was thought of as a poster bout-likeable, friendly, respected by all and considered a great role model for kids.
And now what kind of message does this send to the same kids? Something akin to the end justify the means and just don't get caught?
As a Sox fan I am troubled deeply by this,
Sure there are 100+ other guys in that report who also took them;is the new meaning of "keeping up with the Jones's?"
Comment
Comment