Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Proof/Facts/Evidence Is Not Always True

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by vols fan View Post
    HE WAS BEING A SMART ASS WHEN HE ASKED YOU THAT SAVAGE. Savage,I know you think your sounding smart but when dumb rednecks like me and KB have you figured out then its time for a role play change.


    As far as me being a mouthpiece, KB don't need me when he's dealing with attention whores like you.He can handle yall just fine on his own
    Dumb rednecks? You said it I didn't.
    KB doesn't need YOUR help, then why did you chime in at a question directed at him?
    Perhaps he can reciprocate and can respond for YOU some day(if and when he decides to think and/or post longer than a one line response).

    Comment


    • Originally posted by savage1 View Post
      (if and when he decides to think and/or post longer than a one line response).
      Savage,go back and look at your post 157,160 and 161.Pot is that kettle calling?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by vols fan View Post
        Savage,go back and look at your post 157,160 and 161.Pot is that kettle calling?
        I did. Perhaps unlike your friend, you can explain something, in this case the similarities if there are any.
        Go back and re-read some of my other posts and the thought put in to making them.
        Then go back and read your buddy's responses to some of the things (if you can call them that).
        All I ever got back was stuff like you would lose in court, you are clueless and a lot of other cliche statements -either that or he dsmply parrots back almost verbatim what someone else said or makes some other imbecilic remark-if he your friend, well as they say perhaps the expression "Birds of a feather flock together" applies.
        Last edited by savage1; 08-12-2009, 10:04 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
          How the hell did he prove they knew about the cat monte??????????
          Uh, how about once he went before the condo board. That's when the Statutes of Limitations started.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
            You are fucken just as whacked as he is monte. I lived in them for 10 fucken years and there was no statute of limitations on the association contract i signed. It isn't rape or murder, it says as long as you fucken live there, you go by the rules. I also told you that 2 others tried fighting them over a shitbag cat too and they lost, and moved out. This isn't fucken rape or rocket science here.
            Dude it doesn't matter what the fuck the association rules say! Statutes of Limitations has no regards to a condo association rules.

            Comment


            • Since this shit has been going on for so long I want to see a damn picture of this cat!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BettorsChat View Post
                Dude it doesn't matter what the fuck the association rules say! Statutes of Limitations has no regards to a condo association rules.

                Monte, It is a private association with their OWN rules. What don't you get about that?

                And no shit they knew once he was in front of them talking about the fucken fleabag. At the time, when they 1st found out, they could have applied the rules if they chose to. Who gives a shit about 20 years later. All along we have stated that "AT THE TIME" the association could have EASILY won the case. Where the hell do statute of limitations apply there? `

                Comment


                • Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                  Unless you were walking away from a court of law, you won nothing savage.
                  Wayne and Harlod are right imo. It's like Savage walked in with his lawer friend and strong armed the association. Maybe the association should have called the bluff and brought in their own lawer. I think you are lucky that didn't happen savage.

                  Hopefuly you learned the next time that you move and they say no pets, you say no thanks.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BearDown View Post
                    Wayne and Harlod are right imo. It's like Savage walked in with his lawer friend and strong armed the association. Maybe the association should have called the bluff and brought in their own lawer. I think you are lucky that didn't happen savage.

                    Hopefuly you learned the next time that you move and they say no pets, you say no thanks.
                    You obviously have not read all of the posts why I believe and feel very confident I would have won based on what I and my attorney would have presented had the Associatiom chosen to pursue this rather than jusy chickn out and walk away.
                    If reading all the give and take here is too much work(which I am sure it would be), simply go back and read post 149.
                    Based simply on that I believe if this case had ever gone to court, I would have had an excellent chance of winning(that is not being fined and allowed to keep the cat).

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by savage1 View Post
                      I would have had an excellent chance of winning(that is not being fined and allowed to keep the cat).
                      It's nice to know people can still dream ... even at your age!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                        It's nice to know people can still dream ... even at your age!
                        Why not try answering post 149 DIRECTLY which was addressed to YOU (instead of ignoring it) rather than answering a question which posed to someone else?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by savage1 View Post
                          Why not try answering post 149 DIRECTLY which was addressed to YOU (instead of ignoring it) rather than answering a question which posed to someone else?

                          I have explained your problems with this case 100 times already and i have no clue what that post is about and i don't care to know. You would have lost and been laughed at in court. We have established that already so that is good enough for me.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                            I have explained your problems with this case 100 times already and i have no clue what that post is about and i don't care to know. You would have lost and been laughed at in court. We have established that already so that is good enough for me.
                            Nice copout answer Wayne-you can't figure post 149 out or is it you don't have and answer for it? lol
                            And you skirted/question Monte's question too-how come?
                            As stated before, you simply pick out the points which you think and simply ignore those made by others for which you have no DIRECT answers.
                            I would love to debate you sometime on an issue which was FAIRLY judged by neutral folks and on which we disagreed and see who would win based on the most RELEVANT and FACTUAL statements which pertained to that issue.
                            What happened at YOUR condo with folks who had i.ndoor cats has ZERO relevance to the particular situation and circumstances faced by me!
                            ps the fact that you would compare allotted outdoor parking spaces with an INDOOR cat owned by me on my poperty speaks volumes about the way in which you argue.
                            Last edited by savage1; 08-13-2009, 06:19 PM.

                            Comment


                            • We are on page 12 savage. I would say that is anything but a copout buddy. Good night!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by savage1 View Post
                                ps the fact that you would compare allotted outdoor parking spaces with an INDOOR cat owned by me on my poperty speaks volumes about the way in which you argue.
                                To most of us our car is more important than a fucking cat.That cat don't get you to work everyday

                                Can I be the judge.I vote for Wayne and KB being right

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X