Well....St. Louis (+104) and the Cubs (-115) come up winners today at -1 1/2 runs bringing the total straight up win record since April 24 on teams favored by -200 or more at 27-4. What is most impressive about this run is that 20 of the 27 wins were by more than 1 1/2 runs. The other 7 were wins by 1 run. Laying 1 1/2 runs usually brings the 200+ number down to anywhere from +104 to -150, depending on how much over -200 the team is. Taking an average of -120 and betting 1 dime per game, you would have won 20,000 and lost 13,200 for a net profit of 6,800. I haven't won that much, because I didn't start trusting it until about half way into it and even still as in yesterday's Cubs debacle, I could not make myself bet on them today as a -230 fav and they killed Colorado 10-3. Plus I've been placing other bets which aren't nearly as predictable as was the totals today. Sill, my major play was the Cards so it was a prfitable day. No -200's tomorrowunless LAA, the Cubs or Florida go up some during the day. It's a great system so far. I'm just now to the point of trusting it, so I thought I'd pass it along. Good luck!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Laying Chalk and Runs With Heavy Favs
Collapse
X
-
IMO never the the home favorite on the RL. The home team doesn't bat in the bottom of the 9th if they are winning by one run or once they score a run in extra innings.
Secondly, I wouldn't trust it just yet. A 5 week run doesn't make a long term winning system. I'm certain long term it'll be close to a break even system.
-
Originally posted by JohnnyFairPlayWell....St. Louis (+104) and the Cubs (-115) come up winners today at -1 1/2 runs bringing the total straight up win record since April 24 on teams favored by -200 or more at 27-4. What is most impressive about this run is that 20 of the 27 wins were by more than 1 1/2 runs. The other 7 were wins by 1 run. Laying 1 1/2 runs usually brings the 200+ number down to anywhere from +104 to -150, depending on how much over -200 the team is. Taking an average of -120 and betting 1 dime per game, you would have won 20,000 and lost 13,200 for a net profit of 6,800. I haven't won that much, because I didn't start trusting it until about half way into it and even still as in yesterday's Cubs debacle, I could not make myself bet on them today as a -230 fav and they killed Colorado 10-3. Plus I've been placing other bets which aren't nearly as predictable as was the totals today. Sill, my major play was the Cards so it was a prfitable day. No -200's tomorrowunless LAA, the Cubs or Florida go up some during the day. It's a great system so far. I'm just now to the point of trusting it, so I thought I'd pass it along. Good luck!
Good luck on whatever you do!
Comment
-
I noticed your POD yesterday with the -1 gem on St. Louis, Mr. Cheese. I have heard you mention it but it didn't sink in till that moment. I believe that is a solid play. I like percentage plays and that play sounds solid. Franks take on the RL home team also makes sense, maybe he has some stats on this factor. Home vs Away RL. Thanks for the info. The parlays I hit yesterday could have included some RL at -1 for a bigger gain. I believe if it ties - the bet is brought down to the remaining teams that are in the parlay with value just on the remaining teams. Such as 2 team parlay- figures as a single bet on the remaining team. Is this correct?"The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.
Comment
-
The parlays I hit yesterday could have included some RL at -1 for a bigger gain. I believe if it ties - the bet is brought down to the remaining teams that are in the parlay with value just on the remaining teams. Such as 2 team parlay- figures as a single bet on the remaining team. Is this correct?
And we all know what happened to Bad Luck when he tried to play the NYY on the money line at those high odds!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpearitFranks take on the RL home team also makes sense, maybe he has some stats on this factor. Home vs Away RL. Thanks for the info.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpearitI noticed your POD yesterday with the -1 gem on St. Louis, Mr. Cheese. I have heard you mention it but it didn't sink in till that moment. I believe that is a solid play. I like percentage plays and that play sounds solid. Franks take on the RL home team also makes sense, maybe he has some stats on this factor. Home vs Away RL. Thanks for the info. The parlays I hit yesterday could have included some RL at -1 for a bigger gain. I believe if it ties - the bet is brought down to the remaining teams that are in the parlay with value just on the remaining teams. Such as 2 team parlay- figures as a single bet on the remaining team. Is this correct?
Comment
-
Taking Chicago Cubs -1
Got it last night at Pinny at -132
It's -146 now.
I don't know about any stats except the ones I've been keeping. I see your point about 1 run Chuck....I have just had trouble spotting a run and laying -150 to -170. However, as you pointed out, the 7 one run games would have been a push.
Will be playing Florida -1 (-152) and possibly LAA later -1 run.
Good Luck!
Comment
-
all good looking plays---too late now, but would have also made a good 3 team ML parlay....Remember you can lose 11% of your offensive power (chance to score) if you're home team and up by 1 in the 9th....Thats a lot....GL to ya, and have a safe holiday...kapt
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
Comment