Originally posted by wayne1218
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MLB Early Dog Suckers Bet!!!
Collapse
X
-
I don't want to get involved in this, but imo all of this stuff about traps and on the other hand linemaker mistakes can be reduced to about a 50-50 deal.
If one person bets one side of a game thinking there is a trap line involved and his side wins, he can proclaim he was right.
If someone else bets the other side of the game because he liked the bargain line and it wins, he can say it was a linemaker mistake-imo it is that simple.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcindaville View PostIt reached 190 at a few places
I agree 1000% savage. I really don't care what lines are but when somebody else mentions it, I looked too and I thought it was pretty much what I figured it would be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcindaville View PostLooks like the no run theory game before was the play.
Comment
-
Originally posted by savage1 View PostI don't want to get involved in this, but imo all of this stuff about traps and on the other hand linemaker mistakes can be reduced to about a 50-50 deal.
If one person bets one side of a game thinking there is a trap line involved and his side wins, he can proclaim he was right.
If someone else bets the other side of the game because he liked the bargain line and it wins, he can say it was a linemaker mistake-imo it is that simple.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostUnderstood, so it was close to the -200 you were looking for. Why then is the line "Fishy"? Wouldn't -120 have been the fishy line?
I agree 1000% savage. I really don't care what lines are but when somebody else mentions it, I looked too and I thought it was pretty much what I figured it would be.
Don't get me wrong you,I and everyone else have made bets on juicy looking lines which lose, but we have also made bets which look like great lines with value(linemaker mistakes) which win.
ps I agree with you about what you said about the Cincy line today.
From my perspective and to play Devils Advocate and no offense to Cashmoney, but in this case if I wanted to use that line of thinking(sucker line),I would say that if anything based on the line in this game, that the sucker play was Milwaukee.
In all fairness yeah I should have said this before the game started, but my judgment of the game before it started was that that the line if anything was a bit higher than it should have been based on the fact the Cincy hasn't been playing that well the last few days and had already lost the first two games of this series.
I didn't bet the game for the record.
All of this obviously jnho.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CashMoney View PostAgree lol in the end who the fuck knows??? Lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by CashMoney View PostI know Wayne was right bro !!! Fuck It knew I was taking a chance it all good. You like anything tonight??? I like the white sox porcello fucking blows i dont know how the fuck he is -225???What you think???Questions, comments, complaints:
[email protected]
Comment
-
I still liked the thinking on the brewer play, don't care if the thinking made sense or not, made sense to me. HahaQuestions, comments, complaints:
[email protected]
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcindaville View PostI still liked the thinking on the brewer play, don't care if the thinking made sense or not, made sense to me. Haha
Comment
Comment