The Other Reason Cleveland Will WIN Again Today

[insidethe8thpol]

Sorry Wayne-you are wrong.
Anyone who posts picks has a certain obligation to tell folks that his picks have not done well before telling them to blindly play a pick.
You can do all of the namecalling you wish to and look at things in YOUR OWN way, but I choose to do things differently.
You can gloss over someone's record if you like and say no big deal also;on the other hand you openly post your records for all to see-don't you think everyone should do the same or at least say how they have been doing?
The whole point is whether you want to believe it or not, is that I was trying to indicate to sandman that whatever methods he uses to pick games has not worked of late and perhaps he should re-evaluate his criterion.
Oh yes, I almost forgot-cigarette boxes have warnings on them for a reason!

I dont see anywhere in his post that he tells anyone to play his pick

This is a free forum, no one has an obligation to anyone about their records. He isnt a service selling something & bragging he won 500 in a row

What ever methods anyone uses is their choice & their choice only and no one should be criticized for doing their own thing.

I'm sure his wallet knows if he is winning or losing. Why kick him after a loss.

Its easy to analyze a game after its over with

[savage1]

I dont see anywhere in his post that he tells anyone to play his pick

This is a free forum, no one has an obligation to anyone about their records. He isnt a service selling something & bragging he won 500 in a row

What ever methods anyone uses is their choice & their choice only and no one should be criticized for doing their own thing.

I'm sure his wallet knows if he is winning or losing. Why kick him after a loss.

Its easy to analyze a game after its over with

What does this say?

Cleveland is minus 1.5. Washington on the road is a worse team than Cleveland at home. Play the Cavs.

I don't care if it is a free forum or not-one has a certain obligation to tell folks who play his games how he has been doing-remember also sandman doesn't come around much, meaning that when he does post a pick, some might feel the game is very special.
No one is kicking anyone-I am simply pointing out what should be known about one's record.

[savage1]

Nobody has an obligation to give their records.

ok-then how about folks with a conscience should say how they have been doing.

[ToDaClub]

That's were you're wrong, he isn't charging them, he's giving his opinion/pick. He isn't holding a gun to their head. He has no obligations to anyone. Not you, not Wayne, not Spark, not Monte. He's posting a pick. Period, now it's YOUR choice to do whatever you want with it, unless I'm in China and didn't realize it.

[insidethe8thpol]

What does this say?

Cleveland is minus 1.5. Washington on the road is a worse team than Cleveland at home. Play the Cavs.

I don't care if it is a free forum or not-one has a certain obligation to tell folks who play his games how he has been doing-remember also sandman doesn't come around much, meaning that when he does post a pick, some might feel the game is very special.
No one is kicking anyone-I am simply pointing out what should be known about one's record.

He doesnt say play this with your life savings or play it or I will find you if you dont.

here is what you wrote AFTER the game:

The other side of the coin is that the game which Cleveland won the other night against the Clippers to break the losing streak was a real tough game which went to overtime-it probably took a lot out of them, and you see the result today.

And his obligation to you is what ??

[ToDaClub]

ok-then how about folks with a conscience should say how they have been doing.

OK how bout folks with money make up thier own minds on who they pick?

[insidethe8thpol]

That's were you're wrong, he isn't charging them, he's giving his opinion/pick. He isn't holding a gun to their head. He has no obligations to anyone. Not you, not Wayne, not Spark, not Monte. He's posting a pick. Period, now it's YOUR choice to do whatever you want with it, unless I'm in China and didn't realize it.

Funny that you would mention China. Some have witnessed what you look like after 9 months of hibernation due to snow & the 1st day the sun comes out in June

[wayne1218]

You are about as sharp as a cotton ball savage and a fuckin idiot too if you believe your own words. I can't even believe you are that fuckin stupid. I really can't. Go fuck with people who charge for picks and deserve it you moron

[savage1]

You folks are missing the point-I don't care if his picks are free or not or if he charges.
He told folks to play Cleveland.
Imo at the very least he should have said to proceed with caution because his picks have been ice cold.
One should not simply disappear after a losing pick for a long time(or in his case many losing consecutive picks),then simply re-emerge without at least alluding to how he has done in the past before telling folks to play a certain game.
I notice GG and others tell folks if they have been hot or cold.
By my way of thinking, it is a courtesy/common sense to state one's record or at least tell people how you have been doing before you proceed with another analysis and then stating to play a certain team.
If my going back over the records and bringing out what he did not is a terrible thing, then lets just say that those of you who disagree with me have an entirely different set of value structure and sense of what is ok to do and not ok to do.

[savage1]

You are about as sharp as a cotton ball savage and a fuckin idiot too if you believe your own words. I can't even believe you are that fuckin stupid. I really can't. Go fuck with people who charge for picks and deserve it you moron

Wayne-you can resort to all of the name calling you wish to try to "strengthen" your argument-you haven't addressed specifically any of the points I mentioned and just gloss over them.
Your problem is that you have no respect for anyone else's opinion than your own, and when someone disagrees with you, you merely assume that they are wrong and that you are right without even considering the points made.

[wayne1218]

I call you names savage because you are a total fuckin douchebag for doing what you did to sandman and that is a fact. The world is full of assholes and you added to it in this thread. I would defend anybody here that was attacked in their thread like you did to him and that will never change.

[live jive]

he posted a pick and lost i dont care if sandman lost 80 picks before that. all he said was havent posted in awhile see a game i like. i dont see anywhere that he says i never lose picks like this or my plays are the best u have to bet em. he lost so u savage decide that he should be tellin people well i been losin so even tho i like the pick u should be careful. who are u to inform people what his record is or lost all but one in his last so many plays. u are totally in the wrong guy give it up and stay outta other member's threads if u think they lose then bet against them .

[savage1]

I call you names savage because you are a total fuckin douchebag for doing what you did to sandman and that is a fact. The world is full of assholes and you added to it in this thread. I would defend anybody here that was attacked in their thread like you did to him and that will never change.

I didn't attack him-I pointed out reality and made a few suggestions such as pointing out that he has been cold.
It is too bad that your rigid thinking doesn't allow you to see that.
Again, it is sad but telling that you have to resort to name calling to try to make your points.

[vols fan]

That's were you're wrong

[insidethe8thpol]

That's were you're wrong

wrong (rông, rng)
adj.
1. Not in conformity with fact or truth; incorrect or erroneous.
2.
a. Contrary to conscience, morality, or law; immoral or wicked.
b. Unfair; unjust.
3. Not required, intended, or wanted: took a wrong turn.
4. Not fitting or suitable; inappropriate or improper: said the wrong thing.
5. Not in accord with established usage, method, or procedure: the wrong way to shuck clams.
6. Not functioning properly; out of order.
7. Unacceptable or undesirable according to social convention.
8. Designating the side, as of a garment, that is less finished and not intended to show: socks worn wrong side out.
adv.
1. In a wrong manner; mistakenly or erroneously.
2. In a wrong course or direction.
3. Immorally or unjustly: She acted wrong to lie.
4. In an unfavorable way. See Synonyms at amiss.
n.
1.
a. An unjust or injurious act.
b. Something contrary to ethics or morality.
2.
a. An invasion or a violation of another's legal rights.
b. Law A tort. See Synonyms at injustice.
3. The condition of being in error or at fault: in the wrong.
tr.v. wronged, wrong·ing, wrongs
1. To treat unjustly or injuriously.
2. To discredit unjustly; malign.
3. To treat dishonorably; violate.
Idioms:
do (someone) wrong Informal
To be unfaithful or disloyal.
go wrong
1. To take a wrong turn or make a wrong move.
2. To go astray morally.
3. To go amiss; turn out badly.