I am moving to Mexico

[Spark]

Marxism is demonic in its deceit

Obama gives us Marxism 101


By Judi McLeod Monday, October 18, 2010





Chilling as it may be to hear the President of the United States of America resorting to the lexicon of Star Wars to gin up the crowds in Ohio, there is an upside.


Obama’s “The empire is striking back” speech yesterday is Marxism Dialectic 101—right there on YouTube as indisputable proof to teach your children.


Parents from coast to coast should use the 1-minute video of Barack Obama in Ohio to teach their children what a real Marxist looks like when the mask comes off.


“They’re fighting back. The empire is striking back. To win this election they are plowing tens of millions of dollars into front groups. They are running misleading negative ads all across this country,” was Obama’s Sunday night screed in Ohio.

And get this beaut from a guy who refuses to produce his own credentials: “They (GOP) don’t have the courage to stand up and disclose their identity…they don’t have the gumption.”



“This isn’t just a threat to Democrats. This is a threat to our democracy.”


Radio talk show giant Rush Limbaugh spoke on his show today about the pictures of Obama from the event on the Drudge Report.


“They look demonic and I don’t say this lightly,” Rush told EIB listeners.


“It’s surprising to see these pictures would be used.”


Marxism is demonic in its deceit.



One of its recognizable principles is the practice of its followers to to turn the tables around, blaming the enemy for the very things they have done and are doing.


Textbook example of Marxist lies by omission uttered from Obama’s lips.


“The enemy is plowing tens of millions of dollars into front groups.”


That is precisely what Obama’s largest financier George Soros is doing, “Plowing tens of millions of dollars into front groups.”

Use this teachable moment to bring your children and grandchildren into the light.



The mask of Barack Hussein Obama was lowered in Ohio, Sunday, October 17, 2010.


Come one, come all to see a Marxist at work.

[Spark]

Bloomberg poll shows 4 in 10 Obama supporters now opposing him

posted at 3:35 pm on October 12, 2010 by Ed Morrissey


Disillusionment has set into the one-time supporters of Hopenchange, according to a new Bloomberg poll of likely midterm voters. Nearly 40% of those who previously supported Barack Obama now disapprove of his job performance. The number grows among women and independents, where majorities of both have abandoned the President:

Hope has turned to doubt and disenchantment for almost half of President S:d1&partialfields=-wnnis:NOAVSYND&lr=-lang_ja" target="_blank">Barack Obama’s supporters.


More than 4 of 10 likely voters who say they once considered themselves Obama backers now are either less supportive or say they no longer support him at all, according to a Bloomberg National Poll conducted Oct. 7-10.


Three weeks before the Nov. 2 congressional elections that Republicans are trying to make a referendum on Obama, fewer than half of likely voters approve of the president’s job performance. Likely voters are more apt to say Obama’s policies have harmed rather than helped the economy. Among those who say they are most enthusiastic about voting this year, 6 of 10 say the Democrat has damaged the economy.

The worst news comes from two constituencies that lifted Obama and the Democrats to victory in 2008. Among likely-voter women who supported Obama in 2008, more than 60% have changed their minds, portending a very difficult battle in Obama’s re-election in 2012. Fifty-three percent of independents who voted for Obama now disapprove of his performance.



Interestingly, the perception of Obama as anti-business hasn’t resonated, with only 36% of likely voters professing that belief. There is a significant perception on the Left that Obama has been too pro-business, as Bloomberg reports from anecdotal comments. That doesn’t let Obama off the hook for the economy, though, as 47% believe that Obamanomics has damaged the economy, and 53% saying that Congressional Democrats have damaged the economy as well.


We’ll see how the damage to the Obama brand impacts Democrats in three weeks. With numbers deteriorating like this, and with economists predicting high unemployment and economic stagnation for the entirety of 2011, Obama seems destined to tread the same path as Jimmy Carter by the time Iowa holds its binding caucus in January 2012.

[Spark]

PPP: Obama crashing in blue states

posted at 2:55 pm on October 7, 2010 by Ed Morrissey


Barack Obama isn’t just having problems in red or purple states in this midterm cycle, as it happens. Public Policy Polling, usually seen as a Democratic-leaning pollster, says that even in states Obama won big in 2008, his numbers have sunk dramatically this year. In a dozen blue states that Obama won by nine points or more in his presidential election, his approval numbers are underwater in nine:

One of the most amazing things in our polling over the last month has been how dreadfully bad Barack Obama’s approval numbers are with likely voters in a lot of states that he won by large margins in 2008. We’ve polled 12 states since the beginning of September that Obama won by at least 9 points and in all but 3 of those states- Hawaii, California, and New York- his numbers are under water.


The states where we do now find Obama with negative numbers that he won easily in 2008- Michigan, Wisconsin, New Mexico, New Hampshire, Delaware, Maine, Connecticut, Colorado, and Illinois.


In the places where the bulk of likely voters disapprove of Obama it’s not very hard to see the contribution that’s making to tough Democratic prospects this fall. Democrats at this point are favored to lose Governorships in Michigan, Wisconsin, New Mexico, and Maine. Illinois and even New Hampshire are possible losses as well. The party is also favored to lose its Senate in Wisconsin, could lose them in Illinois and Colorado, looks like it will miss out on a once bright pick up opportunity in New Hampshire, and had to be bailed out by the Tea Party in Delaware.

Of course, we’re seeing that in Nevada as well, a state not mentioned by PPP, although they perhaps have not done a state-wide poll there yet that shows Obama underwater. Nevadans elected Barack Obama by almost 13 points but now have his approval rating at 48/51 in Rasmussen’s latest survey, a little better than his national average but still underwater. Nevada has two statewide races apparently affected by Obama’s popularity, at least in part — the Senate race where Harry Reid has never gotten to the 50% number that usually indicates safety for an incumbent, and a gubernatorial race that Reid’s son Rory is losing so badly that Rory dropped the family name from his advertising.



None of these changes are exactly subtle, either. New Hampshire has the smallest change in the gap, going from a +9 in the 2008 election to a -8 in PPP’s poll. Kelly Ayotte has a good grasp on the Senate race there, and Carol Shea-Porter has a fight on her hands with Frank Guinta for her House seat. In Wisconsin, Obama’s diving nunbers have all but driven a stake through the heart of Russ Feingold’s re-election bid and threatens a sweep of other statewide races, including the open governor’s seat.


Obama won Wisconsin by 14 points in 2008 but now has a 41/54 approval rating for a swing of 27 points in just two years.


The bigger implications from this analysis, though, is for 2012 rather than 2010. If the economy does not improve over the next year, and hardly anyone predicts it will, then unemployment will go higher and dissatisfaction will rise even in these normally blue states. The Democratic Party may have to ask itself whether they can afford to have Barack Obama lead the party in the 2012 elections, or whether they need a change to restore confidence in their ability to govern. Otherwise, with the large number of incumbent Senators having to stand for re-election in that cycle, the tsunami that will engulf the House this cycle may return with greater force in 2012 and take almost everyone out of office.


Democrats cannot compete if Obama comes into that cycle with a -13 in Wisconsin, -5 in Illinois, and -12 in Michigan.

[jcheckers]

Spark, please resize your picture, too big

Thank you

[Spark]

Thank you

Fats, the I did resize it and it fits perfectly. Everything about it fits perfectly.

[Spark]

Thank you

[moondog22]

Bloomberg poll shows 4 in 10 Obama supporters now opposing him

posted at 3:35 pm on October 12, 2010 by Ed Morrissey


Disillusionment has set into the one-time supporters of Hopenchange, according to a new Bloomberg poll of likely midterm voters. Nearly 40% of those who previously supported Barack Obama now disapprove of his job performance. The number grows among women and independents, where majorities of both have abandoned the President:

Hope has turned to doubt and disenchantment for almost half of President S:d1&partialfields=-wnnis:NOAVSYND&lr=-lang_ja" target="_blank">Barack Obama’s supporters.


More than 4 of 10 likely voters who say they once considered themselves Obama backers now are either less supportive or say they no longer support him at all, according to a Bloomberg National Poll conducted Oct. 7-10.


Three weeks before the Nov. 2 congressional elections that Republicans are trying to make a referendum on Obama, fewer than half of likely voters approve of the president’s job performance. Likely voters are more apt to say Obama’s policies have harmed rather than helped the economy. Among those who say they are most enthusiastic about voting this year, 6 of 10 say the Democrat has damaged the economy.

The worst news comes from two constituencies that lifted Obama and the Democrats to victory in 2008. Among likely-voter women who supported Obama in 2008, more than 60% have changed their minds, portending a very difficult battle in Obama’s re-election in 2012. Fifty-three percent of independents who voted for Obama now disapprove of his performance.



Interestingly, the perception of Obama as anti-business hasn’t resonated, with only 36% of likely voters professing that belief. There is a significant perception on the Left that Obama has been too pro-business, as Bloomberg reports from anecdotal comments. That doesn’t let Obama off the hook for the economy, though, as 47% believe that Obamanomics has damaged the economy, and 53% saying that Congressional Democrats have damaged the economy as well.


We’ll see how the damage to the Obama brand impacts Democrats in three weeks. With numbers deteriorating like this, and with economists predicting high unemployment and economic stagnation for the entirety of 2011, Obama seems destined to tread the same path as Jimmy Carter by the time Iowa holds its binding caucus in January 2012.

He sucked me in,but not second time.I hope another Democrate steps forward and runs against Obama.

[Spark]

Summary of the last two years

AMERICANS: “So, the economy is pretty bad and there’s high employment. You think you can do something about that?”

DEMOCRATS AND OBAMA: “We can spend a trillion dollars we don’t have on pork and stuff.”

AMERICANS: “No … that’s not what we want. We’d really like you not to do that.”

DEMOCRATS: “You’re stupid. We’re doing it anyway.”

AMERICANS: “That’s not going to help us get jobs!”

DEMOCRATS: “Sure it will; millions of them … though they may be invisible. You’ll have to trust us they exist. And guess what else we’ll do: We’ll create a giant new government program to take over health care.”

AMERICANS: “That has nothing to do with jobs!”

DEMOCRATS: “We don’t care about that anymore. We really want a giant new health care program. We’re sure you’ll love it.”

AMERICANS: “Don’t pass that bill. You hear me? Absolutely do not pass that bill.”

DEMOCRATS: “Believe me; you’ll love it. It has … well, I don’t know what exactly is in the bill, but we’re sure it’s great.”

AMERICANS: “Listen to me: DO. NOT. PASS. THAT. BILL.”

DEMOCRATS: “You’re not the boss of me! We’re doing it anyway!”

AMERICANS: “Look what you did! Now the economy is way worse, we’re even deeper in debt, and we have a bunch of new laws we don’t want!”

DEMOCRATS: “You’re racist.”

AMERICANS: “Wha … How is that racist?”

DEMOCRATS: “Now you’re getting violent! Stop being violent and racist, you ignorant hillbillies! And remember to vote Democrat in November.”

[Spark]

America Rise Up! Congress Must Strictly Obey Constitutional Laws, As They “WERE” Intended, To Restore Our Freedom, Economy and Individual Prosperity. Let’s Take Our Country Back!

OBAMA’S COLLEGE CLASSMATE SPEAKS OUT

September 1, 2010 by Capt. Karl

Barack Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos — thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.

Barack Obama is my college classmate ( Columbia University , class of ‘83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University . They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands.

Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival … and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.

– Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn’t care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a depression?

– Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama’s biggest contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama “spread the wealth around.”

– Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who’s asking for a 51st state? Who’s asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Obama’s plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.

– Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America . But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security.

– Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions — including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America . The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.

– Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition.

With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.

 Add it up and you’ve got the perfect Marxist scheme — all devised by my Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan.

       True per snopes!

       http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/overwhelm.asp

Last edited by Spark; 10-21-2010, 04:38 PM.

---

Comment

Post Cancel

[jcheckers]

Demplosion

For all the Happy Republicans, just think if you can't do any better you'll get all the blame in 2012!

[Spark]

Poll: Most Want Obama Fired In 2012


By Paul Bedard

Posted: October 27, 2010


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, rapped by the White House for pledging to make Barack Obama a one-term president, seems to have the support of a majority of Americans. A new poll provided to Whispers says that 56 percent of likely voters want the president fired.



According to pollster Doug Schoen, whose new poll shows vast support for the Tea Party movement among voters, the president is still liked by about half the nation. In fact, more like him personally than like his policies. Some 48 percent think he's a nice guy, while just 42 percent approve of his job performance.

[Spark]

Most Americans believe Obama should be a one-term president: poll


By CLEMENTE LISI

Last Updated: 1:34 PM, October 21, 2010
Posted: 1:07 PM, October 21, 201



A majority of Americans don't think President Obama deserves to keep his job, a poll released today shows.


With less than two weeks to go before the midterm elections, a survey conducted by Gallup shows that only 39 percent of Americans think Obama deserves to be re-elected in 2012.


A staggering 54 percent think he should be a one-term president, the poll found.

[Spark]

I am sombody stupid.
Spent many a day picketing
banks because "They need to
make more mortgages
available to the poor."

[Spark]

What a JOKE!!!!







OBAMA's GREATEST ACCOMPLISHMENT



He became exactly the kind
of politician he once claimed to despise!

[Spark]

From day one Obama has had the attitude that it is his way or the highway. Maybe electing a guy who was a junior senator for 2 years, who had basically never had a real job in his life, wasn't such a good idea?? The more you hear him the dumber he sounds.