Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sec,sec,sec,sec,sec,sec!!!!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by ogarza View Post
    The system just tries to determine top 2 teams, all other bowls either have tie ins or at large selections, so vatech and mich for that matter...didnt earn their spots, they were selected by that particular bowl to sell tickets
    Then that just proves our point even more. It's fucked up from top to bottom.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by vols fan View Post
      Then that just proves our point even more. It's fucked up from top to bottom.
      I agree with you about this absurd system, but was just answering your question...I mean shit west virginia is in a bcs bowl, I could think of at least 5 teams more deserving than them.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
        "If Lsu played Okie St, they would Win by 21 or more."

        And you know this how? Again, this whole thing is BS cuz it's all spoKen in hypotheticals as if they're facts. I'm just tired of hearing the argument end at "Team A would not beat Team B."
        That's what I love too Jimmy! How do they know this? Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't, but Bama already had their shot and came up short.

        Comment


        • #94
          Halftime score between Div I-AA Georgia Southern and Alabama.....Bama 24-14.

          Nuff said.

          KAZ
          [email protected]

          I'm just here so I won't get fined....

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by kbsooner21 View Post
            That's what I love too Jimmy! How do they know this? Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't, but Bama already had their shot and came up short.
            I still don't understand this idea.

            "They had their shot and lost."

            What a ridiculous concept, let's not put the two best or most deserving teams, let's just get a different team in there. That's nonsense.

            If you want to see Oklahoma State play, just say so. But to act like Bama has no right to play because they already played LSU previously just doesn't make any sense to me.
            "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

            Comment


            • #96
              I want to see Oklahoma State play...

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                I still don't understand this idea.

                "They had their shot and lost."

                What a ridiculous concept, let's not put the two best or most deserving teams, let's just get a different team in there. That's nonsense.

                If you want to see Oklahoma State play, just say so. But to act like Bama has no right to play because they already played LSU previously just doesn't make any sense to me.
                Just one of the many reasons I've already listed why Okie St should be playing.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                  I still don't understand this idea.

                  "They had their shot and lost."

                  What a ridiculous concept, let's not put the two best or most deserving teams, let's just get a different team in there. That's nonsense.

                  If you want to see Oklahoma State play, just say so. But to act like Bama has no right to play because they already played LSU previously just doesn't make any sense to me.
                  I asked before and I'll ask again, what did Bama do this season to deserve a rematch w/LSU?

                  I pointed out what Ok St did to deserve to be in the game.

                  And let's say Bama wins this time 9-6, they're crowned NCs?

                  Yea, that makes sense.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    If you think Oklahoma State is more deserving, that's fine (despite the fact I think you are wrong). But the, "they already played" argument is complete nonsense and has no validity.
                    "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                    Comment


                    • I think the best two teams are playing for the title, just no one wants to see it.

                      Promise you LSU doesn't want to play Bama again, that's the only team that can beat them.
                      IMO
                      Questions, comments, complaints:
                      [email protected]

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by jcindaville View Post
                        I think the best two teams are playing for the title, just no one wants to see it.

                        Promise you LSU doesn't want to play Bama again, that's the only team that can beat them.
                        IMO
                        I agree. At this point these are CLEARY the top two teams.

                        I really don't need to see SoS or any of that to know that I do not want to see OSU vaunted 103rd ranked defense (giving up 445 yards of offense a game) who let up who let up 34 to UL-Laf, 33 to Tulsa, 26 to Texas, 45 to Kansas St and 37 to Iowa St. This is why people say LSU will beat them by 2+TDs.

                        So what I see LSU and Alabama are 1 and 2 and deserve to be in the game.

                        I actually don't think OSU would provide the best match-up to LSU outside of Alabama. Teams that I think have less warts than OSU that would give LSU a better game are: Stanford, Oregon, Wisconsin and Maybe Boise St (although there schedule TOTALLY inflates their statistics, and outside of cathcing Georgia and game 1 they lost to TCU their only other legit foe).

                        Notice the word "think" used a lot here. This is all opinion upon what I saw watching these teams. Unfortunately it is either that or computer rankings that we are left with unless there are playoffs.

                        Really Would love to see:

                        Round

                        New Orleans Bowl Dec 17th: 1 LSU vs 8 Wisconsin
                        (La Laf and SDSU NO bowl game)

                        Beef o Brady Bowl Dec 17th: 2 Alabama vs 7 Arkansas
                        (FIU and Marshall NO Bowl game)

                        Famous Idaho Bowl Dec 17th: 3 Ok St vs 6 Boise St
                        (Ohio and Utah NO Bowl game)

                        New Mexico Bowl Dec 17th: 4 Standford vs 5 Oregon
                        (Wyoming and Temple NO bowl Game)

                        Second Round

                        Independence Bowl Dec 27th: Winner of 1 LSU/8 Wisconsin vs winner of 4 Standford/5 Oregon
                        (Missouri and North Carolina NO Bowl)

                        Little Ceasar Bowl Dec 27th: Winner of 2 Alabama/7 Arkansas vs 3 Ok St/6 Boise St
                        (W Mich and Purdue NO bowl)

                        Semi Final

                        Gator Bowl Jan 2nd: Who ever left
                        (No Bowl for Ohio St and Florida, or move them down into another sub bowl)

                        Final

                        Jan 9th: BCS Champ


                        It still keeps the traditional bowl structure, keeps the timeline, allows other teams to still fight in the regular season, gives us a true champion from the top 8 teams, is similar to the NIT/NCAA BB, etc.. And there would be a lot more people at the Beef o Brady bowl!!
                        2012 - 2013 NCAAF

                        21 - 20 - 0

                        2012 - 2013 NFL

                        14 - 10 - 1

                        Comment


                        • I agree jc. I think lsu would love to play okie st. The physical play of lsu would make okie st scream uncle by halftime. The only team that could match lsu in that area is bama.

                          I can't wrap my head around any theory that says okie st deserves a shot after losing to skank ass iowa st. I mean seriously ...............

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                            I still don't understand this idea.

                            "They had their shot and lost."

                            What a ridiculous concept, let's not put the two best or most deserving teams, let's just get a different team in there. That's nonsense.

                            If you want to see Oklahoma State play, just say so. But to act like Bama has no right to play because they already played LSU previously just doesn't make any sense to me.


                            I guess these guys want the world series reduced to one game. Well you had your shot in game 1 and lost so that was there chance

                            Comment


                            • Do they have the correct 2 teams, maybe, but one thing I do agree with is I don't root for teams from my conference. That's like Red Sox fans hoping the Yankees win the World Series cause they are from the same Division, Viking fans hoping the Packers win the Super Bowl, etc.

                              My 2 Favorite Teams are the Fighting Sioux (UND) and whoever is playing the Bison (NDSU). I really don't get loving all the teams in your conference unless you're playing them. Maybe I'm just a bitter person.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
                                "Alabama not playing in their conference championship just displays how much stronger the SEC is than the B12. #2 team in the nation doesn't even make the title game because of how strong the other teams in the conference are."

                                Uh wrong again, it just means the #1 team played in their conference.

                                Who else in the SEC is good btw? I'll wait.


                                who else is good in the sec?just look and check who won the last 5 national championships,SEC TEAMS...get real its the toughest football conference and always has been
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X