Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sec,sec,sec,sec,sec,sec!!!!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
    I don't get it? Because they already played, they shouldn't play again? That argument has no validity to me.

    Aren't we looking for the two best teams to play each other?
    Yep...and Bama is the 2nd best team because...?

    My pt is nobody knows until they actually do the right thing and institute a playoff.

    So what if Bama beats LSU this time? They're NCs because they won the 2nd time? LAME

    Comment


    • #17
      If you look at resume, OSU is probably a little better, depending on how u want to look at it. Personally, I'd like to see USC play LSU.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
        B played a tougher schedule...that's a fact.

        B won their conference...that's a fact.

        A already lost to LSU...that's a fact.

        A didn't even win their side of the conference...that's a fact.

        What has A done to deserve a rematch w/LSU?

        There's a reason it's a "mythical" national champion...the entire system is a f'ing joke.

        PS Why is V Tech in the Sugar Bowl over Boise? Such a f'ing scam.
        What makes Okie St.'s schedule tougher?

        Yes, Bama lost to LSU, did OK St, play LSU? No they played Iowa St, and lost. Which loss is worse? You decide.

        Bama didn't win their side of the conference. They came 2nd, to the #1 team in the country. Pardon them if they don't get to play to Kansas St and Oklahoma to win their conference.

        A has lost one game, B has lost one game. The quality of those losses is what separates them.

        I have my disagreements with the BCS system as well, but this year, they did not get it wrong, IMO.
        "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
          Yep...and Bama is the 2nd best team because...?

          My pt is nobody knows until they actually do the right thing and institute a playoff.

          So what if Bama beats LSU this time? They're NCs because they won the 2nd time? LAME
          I don't agree with the system either, and I'd be in favor of a playoff as well.
          "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
            What makes Okie St.'s schedule tougher?

            Yes, Bama lost to LSU, did OK St, play LSU? No they played Iowa St, and lost. Which loss is worse? You decide.

            Bama didn't win their side of the conference. They came 2nd, to the #1 team in the country. Pardon them if they don't get to play to Kansas St and Oklahoma to win their conference.

            A has lost one game, B has lost one game. The quality of those losses is what separates them.

            I have my disagreements with the BCS system as well, but this year, they did not get it wrong, IMO.

            Bama played 3 teams in the final BCS rankings.

            Okie St played 4.

            Also, not sure how it's determined, but they showed the SoS the other night for the top 5 teams and Okie St's was higher than Bama's.

            Who had better wins? I would argue Okie St did.

            I'll ask again, what exactly did Bama do to deserve a rematch?

            Comment


            • #21
              My bigger pt is the fact that there shouldn't be an argument come the end of the CFB season. Play the f'ing games on the field and determine it that way instead of letting some f'ing nerds in bow ties determine who plays for the NC.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
                Bama played 3 teams in the final BCS rankings.

                Okie St played 4.

                Also, not sure how it's determined, but they showed the SoS the other night for the top 5 teams and Okie St's was higher than Bama's.

                Who had better wins? I would argue Okie St did.

                I'll ask again, what exactly did Bama do to deserve a rematch?
                College Football Power Ratings - College FB Team Strength of Schedule Power Rating

                I found this for SoS, but like you said I have no idea how it's determined.

                My opinion is biased, because I feel that even the fourth or fifth best teams in the SEC could hold their own/beat the top B12 teams. But without the matchup, who knows.

                Bama didn't do much to "deserve" a rematch, I just don't see why everyone thinks OK St. is so much more worthy.

                I'm interested in seeing the two best teams play each other, I think we got that, others will disagree, however.
                "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
                  My bigger pt is the fact that there shouldn't be an argument come the end of the CFB season. Play the f'ing games on the field and determine it that way instead of letting some f'ing nerds in bow ties determine who plays for the NC.
                  Agreed.
                  "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    The BCS ruins college football for me. If you compare the two teams as "team A" and "team B" you could make an argument for either, depending on what you put more weight on a Good win or a Bad loss. Now we have to wait over a month to even watch these two teams play? Ridiculous. The only thing the BCS is good for is a conversation topic.

                    Personally I would like to have seen OKST play LSU because I already saw Bama and LSU play. Yea, it was a good hard fought game by both teams but I already saw it. I want to know if OKST and the Big12 can hang with LSU and the big bad SEC. The point of a National Championship is to find the best team in the country not the best team in the SEC.

                    At least the NFL admits all it cares about is money, thats why they had a lockout. The NCAA is the same way they just wont admit it.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I don't want to watch Bama v LSU 2 again, but LSU would hammer the shit out of any fraud team from the Crap 12.

                      They should call it a season and give the title to LSU now
                      Questions, comments, complaints:
                      [email protected]

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by kbsooner21 View Post
                        Okie state beat i believe 5 teams ranked in the top 25. Bama beat 2. Save me the tough sec schedule bullshit. Vandy, florida, miss, miss st, tenn all sucked major dick this year.

                        And this thread proves my point about how fucking queer "sec" fans are. A tenn fan starts this thread even though his team isn't even bowl eligible. Why the fuck would you want one of your rivals to win the ship? As an OU fan, I'm glad Bama is playing LSU instead of Okie St, even though i think it's bs.
                        What does Tennessee not being eligible for a bowl have anything to do with this? I don't hate any team in the sec. I dislike them all when we play but I pull for all sec teams when they play out of conference.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by jcindaville View Post
                          I don't want to watch Bama v LSU 2 again, but LSU would hammer the shit out of any fraud team from the Crap 12.

                          They should call it a season and give the title to LSU now

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
                            B played a tougher schedule...that's a fact.

                            B won their conference...that's a fact.

                            A already lost to LSU...that's a fact.

                            A didn't even win their side of the conference...that's a fact.

                            What has A done to deserve a rematch w/LSU?

                            There's a reason it's a "mythical" national champion...the entire system is a f'ing joke.

                            PS Why is V Tech in the Sugar Bowl over Boise? Such a f'ing scam.

                            Absolutely !!! Just a MYTHICAL Champion.

                            It does say a lot when the NCAA doesnt even recognize or crown a Football champion
                            He who wears diaper knows his shit - Confucius

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by LVJimmy View Post
                              My bigger pt is the fact that there shouldn't be an argument come the end of the CFB season. Play the f'ing games on the field and determine it that way instead of letting some f'ing nerds in bow ties determine who plays for the NC.
                              I agree 100%. 4 team or 8 team playoff has to happen at some time.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                By not having Ok.St. play LSU in the BCS title game has to be the biggest fraud since our gov't let North Dakota become a state !!
                                He who wears diaper knows his shit - Confucius

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X