Friday's Service Plays & Requests

[wayne1218]

Post Here

[KCStar]

Pychic Sports has a Wiseguy today. He has lost 3 in a row but is 30-7 on his last 37.

[Spark]

Frank

Unreal my man....Nice...very nice...and thanks...You Da man...

fjb...thank you also for chiming in with a winner....

bettors, you have a great forum here...thanks....

[phillyfan]

I was accused as having an agenda in the other thread. Nothing could be further from the truth. I use this board and like the information. I was just letting Sparks know that the play was wrong. I wish I had noticed before game time, but I didn't get the chance.

As far as the comment made by bettorstalk, I would respectfully disagree. It only hurts the readers when the wrong plays are posted. The plays become meaningless. If guy post up the wrong plays than the whole thing becomes useless.

I will try and get Leonard today and post it. I no longer have access to Alatex except right before post times. Sometimes when my friend doens't wait around he'll give it to me a little earlier.

Good Luck----


Here is Leonard's pick yesterday from Vegas Experts:

Guaranteed Pick: Bryan Leonard
Bryan Leonard's NCAA Play Of The Week: Winner
Game: Cleveland State at Loyola Chicago Feb 26 2004 8:00PM
Prediction: Loyola Chicago
Grade: Winner (100)
Reason: Not exactly a marquee matchup. Both teams are terrible, playing no defense. Loyola allows 46% shooting, while Cleveland State allows 44% and 76 ppg on the road. Cleveland State (4-22 SU, 6-14 ATS) is riding a 20-game losing streak. You can’t get much worse than that, although Loyola is trying. The Loyola Chicago Ramblers (7-19) have lost 14 of the last 15 games. Doesn’t anybody know how to box out and play defense anymore? The edge for Loyola here is that they have home court and a better front line. Senior Paul McMillen (16 ppg, 7 rpg) and center Demetrius Williams are good offensively and should be able to command the glass against Cleveland State. Last month these teams met at Cleveland State and Loyola got a 90-83 win. In a battle of two bad and frustrated teams, Loyola wins easily in front of the home crowd.

[savage1]

KC-You say Psychic Sports has lost 3 in a row to make them 30-7 owisegiy plays ;that would imply they were 30-4 before them.
I would have to see actual independent documentation before believing that claim;that is 88% over a significant period of time.
From what I have seen posted of this service's everyday picks, I am far from impressed;don't believe everything you hear and see.

[meteor]

savage

i've been on the psychic wise guy plays since last december..i can personally vouch for the fact that before their recent 3 game losing streak they had only lost 1 wise guy that entire time..so i don't know about the 30-4 prior to the 3 game losing streak but i can tell you that before that the plays were something like on a 19-1 run...i know cause i played them all.

[sopran2]

psycic

:confused:

Where do you find the psycics web page?????

[meteor]

you can link through it via ****************.com...their regular plays aren't all that great...and with the wise guys in a slump i might just pass on it myself.

it was a hell of a run though...hopefully they will get back on track.the last 3 picks were not even close however

[tomrobbins]

Documented Psychic Records

I know there is a lot of doubt out there, but I've been following the Psychic for 2 years and can attest to the record being true. This year football he started 10-0 on these "wiseguy" plays, scam or not, these plays were posted in various forums. I actually have most of the NBA/NCAABB plays he had last year and some of the NFL ones from this season- here they are, believe it or don't, i'm just trying to show the truth:


2/11/2003 NBA Detriot Pistons -5 vs Chicago Bulls WIN

2/16/2003 NCAABB Evansville -7 vs Northern Iowa WIN

2/21/2003 NBA Washington Wizards +2.5 vs New Jersey Nets WIN

3/7/2003 NBA L.A. Lakers -7 vs Minnesota T-Wolves WIN

3/14/2003 NBA New Orleans Hornets -5.5 vs L.A. Clippers LOSS

3/28/2003 NBA New Jersey Nets +1 vs New York Knicks WIN

4/4/2003 NBA L.A. Clippers +8.5 vsSeattle Supersonics WIN

4/13/2003 NBA Detriot Pistons +1 vs Memphis WIN

5/15/2003 NBA L.A. Lakers -7 vs San Antonio Spurs LOSS

9/7/2003 NFL Jacksonville Jags +4 vs Carolina Panthers WIN

9/29/2003 NFL Green Bay Packers -4 vs Chicago Bears WIN

26-Oct NFL N.Y. Giants +6.5 vs Minnesota Vikings WIN

16-Nov NFL Atlanta Falcons +9 vs New Orleans Saints WIN

7-Dec NFL Tampa Bay Bucs +3 vs New Orleans Saints WIN

And yes the last 3 have lost horribly! so play tonights at your own risk!

[KCStar]

As far as independently documented I don't think they are. Their regular plays suck because I bought a month last year to try those out.

Tom Robbins has correct plays since last Feb. I was on them 3 months before that, the first one being in Nov with a win on New Orleans at Baltimore. I don't have accurate records but the only one they lost in football for me the past two years was the over/under on the Bears/Panthers in 2003. It went over by a point. Prior to this 3 game run of losing the only 2 losses were that and the Hornets and both were by a point or half point.

I'm not sure about that Lakers/Spurs game you have posted Tom Robbins, but I could have just been out of town and missed it or something :confused:

[trantv]

Spark

Spark,

I saw Iceytone post yesterday about VSI going to cancel his account because they thought Iceyton was posting it....

Iceyton..hope the problem is solve.....

Spark and Iceyton has been a big help to this forum....why stop.....

I have an Ideal.....just post the VSI 20* and Consensus plays only with a nick name for the VSI cappers.......trying to be 007 here...

what do u all think.....

thank you......very much.....this forum is a partnership and delecation to pimp our bookies....all of us in this forum is together as one.......aka NE Patriots model "Team Work"

[frankb03]

Originally posted by savage1
KC-You say Psychic Sports has lost 3 in a row to make them 30-7 owisegiy plays ;that would imply they were 30-4 before them.
I would have to see actual independent documentation before believing that claim;that is 88% over a significant period of time.
From what I have seen posted of this service's everyday picks, I am far from impressed;don't believe everything you hear and see.

Savage, this shit never ends. We had this debate during football season. Members claiming he was 29-1 or some shit like that. Outrageous claims on a service. Then clients coming out of the woodwork to vouch.

I have the same question as before. If the guy is that good and you can vouch he's 30-4 then why are you here looking for his play for free? Pay for the freakin thing. I would gladly pay a service if he was 30-4 while I was a client.

[tomrobbins]

Not trying to ruffle any feathers here. Basically you believe the records or you don't, it really doesn't matter to me. I see no benifit for me by lying about games that I have seen win first-hand. While I can't attest for the 30-7 record or whatever it is, I can say the plays have been winning lately (other than the 3 consecutive losses). I don't think the guy is any different than you or me, he hit a great run and probably can't duplicate it over time. I agree that if people want it so bad they should just cough up the cash and stop looking for it for free, but I think that's a pretty common occurance in forums like these-not everyone contributes equally, and that's going to mean people (me included) will usually wait and see if someone else will post it first. Just my opinion, don't think i'm better or worse than anyone else in here and i will post service plays when i get them. Best of Luck to everyone.

-Tom

[savage1]

I am not saying Psychic does not have a VERY GOOD record on their big plays, as do a number of services.
HOWEVER, when someone posts an unusually outstanding record of 30 out of 34 or to take a more extreme exampale Ty Gaston of something like 104 and 8 in his Code Zebra plays, I see no harm in pointing out that 88% as is the case here seems kind of far fetched especially when I see 3 big losing plays in a row, and when I have seen their everyday plays posted, which are mediocre in my opinion.

[frankb03]

tom

I agree! Why pay if you can get them for free. BUT someone has to pay. By KCSTAR's own admission 'I was on them 3 months', my question remains: if you were on a service for 3 months that made me a ton of money wouldn't you pay? I know I would.

As I stated in an earlier post we had this debate during the football season. Guess what happened? Pychic lost.

Every member has a right to request any service they want. It's not for me to judge (unless it's Loser Larry LOL). Some members feel they have to justify their request by posting the service record. Most of the time that record is outrageous. That's what draws attention. Then the debates follow.

IMO members should request a service and leave it at that. Don't post a record. Don't post how hot the service is. Only my opinion.