I had a cat named blackie, hope that is not racist cause he was black. I liked that fucker, ran his ass over in the driveway taking the kids and wife to Ryans for Sunday brunch. Never will i forget the sound my little buddy made when i backed over his unfortunate ass, man the kids freaked out.
My Lord man, people have told you a 100 times why they disagreed with your logic and why they did.
Your problem is that you dont agree with their logic and they are wrong and you are right.
Then the name calling starts. DUH!!!!!!!
Plus, you want to argue over some of the stupidest shit ever put into a thread. That cat story would bore paint off of a wall.
Why was it boring?? Because most people at a gambling forum dont give two fucks about a cat, a condo, or a man who wants to argue with rules that didnt allow animals. You bent the rules, period. There, i gave you my logic, and a reason why.
You like attention dont you?? My logic on that, well you start lots of threads at a gambling site and the threads are not gambling related. You like to debate, my logic on that, you argue with people you dont even know on a chat site for hours at a time.
Ok and to play Devil's Advocate, how come there were so many views and responses to the Cat/Condo if as you say most folks didn't care about it?
If I am not interested in a topic, I don't read it or obviously respond to it.or
Moving to today, tell me SPECIFICALLY what/why I posted in posts 102, 103 and 107 in this thread today is and/or should not be of any interest in a non-gambling section of this Forum?
Also, unlike some here, I give credit when it is due like I did to Phil did today when he made a valid point with reasoning behind his take on my marriage;conversely when I asked Wayne and others to respond to my arguments point by point DIRECTLY repeatedly in several cases in the Cat/Condo thread, the posts were ignored or worse were returned with more insults;I was NEVER told by most of you guys that I made a valid point with some logic behind it such as was the Cat/Condo case which I explained point by point.
On the other hand as stated, Phil made a valid point which in truth I expected to be made before today by someone;I admited he was right and then told you guys more about myself-is that considered an awful thing to do?
If you read all of the posts cited above for today carefully, you will see that I view myself far from a perfect person and I will admit my weaknesses and shortcomings now in the past and now;hopefully you guys can do the same(unless of course you feel you have no weaknesses or shortcomings).
ps Your contention that Wayne and others showed me why I was wrong is general;post 149 of the Cat/Condo thread and other references to that which is contained therein and whichare thus pertinent to my contentions were NEVER answered directly by anyone and were just plain IGNORED for obvious reasons!
Ok and to play Devil's Advocate, how come there were so many views and responses to the Cat/Condo if as you say most folks didn't care about it?
If I am not interested in a topic, I don't read it or obviously respond to it.or
Moving to today, tell me SPECIFICALLY what/why I posted in posts 102, 103 and 107 in this thread today is and/or should not be of any interest in a non-gambling section of this Forum?
Also, unlike some here, I give credit when it is due like I did to Phil did today when he made a valid point with reasoning behind his take on my marriage;conversely when I asked Wayne and others to respond to my arguments point by point DIRECTLY repeatedly in several cases in the Cat/Condo thread, the posts were ignored or worse were returned with more insults;I was NEVER told by most of you guys that I made a valid point with some logic behind it such as was the Cat/Condo case which I explained point by point.
On the other hand as stated, Phil made a valid point which in truth I expected to be made before today by someone;I admited he was right and then told you guys more about myself-is that considered an awful thing to do?
If you read all of the posts cited above for today carefully, you will see that I view myself far from a perfect person and I will admit my weaknesses and shortcomings now in the past and now;hopefully you guys can do the same(unless of course you feel you have no weaknesses or shortcomings).
ps Your contention that Wayne and others showed me why I was wrong is general;post 149 of the Cat/Condo thread and other references to that which is contained therein and is pertinent to my contentions were NEVER answered directly and were just plain IGNORED for obvious reasons!
Give it a rest man!!
2 conclusions:
1) your johnson must be like a Ball Park frank from tossing it to all of the replies in your most recent threads
2) you went through 3 oxygen tanks while typing the 14 War & Peace novels in this thread
1) your johnson must be like a Ball Park frank from tossing it to all of the replies in your most recent threads
2) you went through 3 oxygen tanks while typing the 14 War & Peace novels in this thread
Why? I honestly believe that there are some whi will be interested in what I said today and will at least read it.
Just change the station if you are one of the ones who is not interested.
Ok and to play Devil's Advocate, how come there were so many views and responses to the Cat/Condo if as you say most folks didn't care about it?
If I am not interested in a topic, I don't read it or obviously respond to it.or
Moving to today, tell me SPECIFICALLY what/why I posted in posts 102, 103 and 107 in this thread today is and/or should not be of any interest in a non-gambling section of this Forum?
Also, unlike some here, I give credit when it is due like I did to Phil did today when he made a valid point with reasoning behind his take on my marriage;conversely when I asked Wayne and others to respond to my arguments point by point DIRECTLY repeatedly in several cases in the Cat/Condo thread, the posts were ignored or worse were returned with more insults;I was NEVER told by most of you guys that I made a valid point with some logic behind it such as was the Cat/Condo case which I explained point by point.
On the other hand as stated, Phil made a valid point which in truth I expected to be made before today by someone;I admited he was right and then told you guys more about myself-is that considered an awful thing to do?
If you read all of the posts cited above for today carefully, you will see that I view myself far from a perfect person and I will admit my weaknesses and shortcomings now in the past and now;hopefully you guys can do the same(unless of course you feel you have no weaknesses or shortcomings).
ps Your contention that Wayne and others showed me why I was wrong is general;post 149 of the Cat/Condo thread and other references to that which is contained therein and whichare thus pertinent to my contentions were NEVER answered directly by anyone and were just plain IGNORED for obvious reasons!
Ignore the haters Savvy. Us high IQ, condo rule breaker, wealthy cat lovers need to stick together. Keep preaching brother, I'm listening.
You can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning
Comment