I agree with the theory on who the book needs. However, IMO this does NOT apply to rainman.
Let's exam rainman007 AKA rainman
The guy was exposed as a fraud back in September. He created many treads using tread title BIGGEST DOG WINNER OF THE CENTURY and My Lock of the Year on consecative weekends. His so called top plays were 12-12.
After I exposed rainman as a fraud he disappeared for two months. He was banned. Now here comes rainman007 with identical grammer and typing style.
BIG FUCKING DEAL!!!! He went 3-0. I can throw darts at a dartboard and have a 13% chance of going 3-0.
Personally, I could care less if the guy posts or not. I wouldn't play his selections. I play very few member selections. I'd love for him to keep posting. He'll be exposed as a fraud one more time.
Let's exam rainman007 AKA rainman
The guy was exposed as a fraud back in September. He created many treads using tread title BIGGEST DOG WINNER OF THE CENTURY and My Lock of the Year on consecative weekends. His so called top plays were 12-12.
After I exposed rainman as a fraud he disappeared for two months. He was banned. Now here comes rainman007 with identical grammer and typing style.
BIG FUCKING DEAL!!!! He went 3-0. I can throw darts at a dartboard and have a 13% chance of going 3-0.
Personally, I could care less if the guy posts or not. I wouldn't play his selections. I play very few member selections. I'd love for him to keep posting. He'll be exposed as a fraud one more time.
i know it's only 3 games but every one of them covered easily, you didnt even have to sweat it out. He could be a scam but you dont know until you give him a chance to post his plays. I think it would be best if everyone left him alone and let his plays do the talking. Just my opinion.
Comment