Scrantonkid great posts it seems like you like Frank know what your talking about I hope you post more often.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ron Jeremy/Heavy hitters/Heavy losers:Please read
Collapse
X
-
Let's just drop this. I have never had a problem with you before, and I don't care enough about this to continue arguing. I just want to win money. I don't agree with laying big juice to get 1.5 runs. I'd prefer to just take the underdog on the moneyline. That's my strategy. Yours is different. Whats the big deal? I just thought you were way out of line attacking me like that.
I already made peace with Scranton, and he was the guy I was talking to in the first place.
Obviously laying big juice on the Yankees was a mistake. I have no one to blame but myself for betting on that group of losers. I can't defend that move. How could I?
Good luck tonight.Posted Plays
2006 NFL Record: 10-8-1 (+11.21 units)
5*: 1-0
2006 NCAA Football Record: 25-20 (+10.74 units)
5*: 0-2
Comment
-
Originally posted by STaylor36Let's just drop this. I have never had a problem with you before, and I don't care enough about this to continue arguing. I just want to win money. I don't agree with laying big juice to get 1.5 runs. I'd prefer to just take the underdog on the moneyline. That's my strategy. Yours is different. Whats the big deal? I just thought you were way out of line attacking me like that.
I already made peace with Scranton, and he was the guy I was talking to in the first place.
Obviously laying big juice on the Yankees was a mistake. I have no one to blame but myself for betting on that group of losers. I can't defend that move. How could I?
I know you made peace with Scranton. You are taking my replies too personal. This is an open forum. When you post you are posting to all. Not to a single member.
GL to you as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by frankb03Why is +1.5 a sucker bet? 27% of the home team wins are 1 run victories. I'd never lay more than -150 when taking the +1.5
Aren't you 15 or 16 years old? Please don't give advice you know nothing about.
Come on man. Who wouldn't take a shot like that personally? That was harsh.
I'm 22 for the record.
Never betting a line of more than -150. Now THAT is some great advice. I might follow that rule myself.
Good luck to all.Posted Plays
2006 NFL Record: 10-8-1 (+11.21 units)
5*: 1-0
2006 NCAA Football Record: 25-20 (+10.74 units)
5*: 0-2
Comment
-
Originally posted by STaylor36Come on man. Who wouldn't take a shot like that personally? That was harsh.
I'm 22 for the record.
You made a broad comment that playing the RL +1.5 is a sucker bet. Yes, playing +1.5 -200 is a bad bet. Playing a road dog +1.5 -120 is NOT a sucker bet. Of course the road dog might win SU. Statistically, they will lose. I get the added edge of 1.5 run knowing that the home team loses 11% of their at bats if they are winning. As I stated twice above. The home favorite wins 27% of the games by 1 run. That 27% is an advantage I'd take laying small juice. As many will attest The 3 Wise Men have won many games getting 1.5 runs. At time against a prohibitive favorite. Some of those games were won SU. Some were won because my team lost by 1 run.
I'm a stickler for accurate info on this site. There is so much bad info on this site and the web. If you make a broad erroneous comment if I don't do it they'll be many others here that will challenge the comment.
There's many spots when playing +1.5 is a huge advantage to the player. If Vegas sets the game total at 7.5 runs they think it'll be a low scoring game. Runs will be at a premium. Getting 1.5 run is to the players advantage.
Comment
Comment