Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Patriots a Dynasty??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by The Lovedoc
    When i woke up and looked at the paper...There is says PATRIOTS A DYNASTY! When i logged on to aol, first thing that came up...PATRIOTS A DYNASTY. Reality check, Yes, you won 3 Superbowls in 4 years, but winning by a fieldgoal everytime makes you a Dynasty?? They were nothing compared to the Dallas cowboys who averaged to win by 17pts or more demolishing the other team. Now thats a dynasty. Give me your thoughts..........
    IMO teams that win the tight games are better than teams that win by blow-outs. They find a way to win.

    That being said I think the word DYNASTY is used too freely. IMO they Yanks, Celtics and Canadians are Dynasties. The Patroit 'Dynasty' didn't even make the playoffs 2 seasons ago.

    Comment


    • #17
      How Can You Call New England A Dynasy When They Don't Even Cover??

      Thats Two Years In A Row That They Don't Cover (good For Me I Had Philly +7) And A Play Here Or There In Any Of Those Super Bowls Vs Rams, Panthers , Iggles And We Could Be Talking About The Buffalo Bills All Over Again. Just My Opinion.

      Comment


      • #18
        I think they're a dynasty, it's unreal what these guys have done, and Brady....never been done before.

        And that damn kid who 'tossed up' the coin? WTF was that....that one is still hurting, i would have accepted my loss if that damn coin would have actually FLIPPED.
        "You like the odds of lightning?"

        Comment


        • #19
          Would have,could have,should have. No Dynasty has ever been determined by their ATS record, get a clue!

          Comment


          • #20
            The Rams were 11 point favorites and didn't even win, PLEASE!

            Comment


            • #21
              Aside from the playoffs and SB, NE has been a covering machine the past two seasons.

              Hopefully, this will be the last DYNASTY thread.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by bad luck
                Thats Two Years In A Row That They Don't Cover (good For Me I Had Philly +7) And A Play Here Or There In Any Of Those Super Bowls Vs Rams, Panthers , Iggles And We Could Be Talking About The Buffalo Bills All Over Again. Just My Opinion.

                BWAHAHAHAHAHA

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Trotter
                  And that damn kid who 'tossed up' the coin? WTF was that....that one is still hurting, i would have accepted my loss if that damn coin would have actually FLIPPED.
                  He threw that thing like a frisbee. If the NFL wanted to put some 6 year old kis out there they should have shown him how to flip the damn thing.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    the pats are a dynasty.. what they have done is awsome , but they're not as good as the other teams that have dominated in the 70's, 80's , 90's... the salary cap has actually helped a team like new england ( well coached ,team comes first attitude) it's leveled the playing field so much that it takes great coaching and unselfish players a great combination in the salary cap age and the pats have both, but these teams don't have the talent to beat the cowboys or 49ers of the last 2 decades the salary cap doesn't allow it not there fault just a fact....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X