Friday's Service Plays & Request Thread

[OleBlueEyes]

Damn that was good! I never thought Spark/Superman could be any better but now that he is reading people's minds I can't wait to see what happens next! Seriously though thanks Spark, I know everyone is on the Knicks and that is usually never good, but now thanks to the LT Game of the Night on the Knicks you can count me in!



OBE

[savage1]

1,873 - 0

In their last 1,873 straight - up victories, The Detroit Pistons have outscored their opponents 1,873 straight times.

That's incredible !!!

Hey Coverboy-what about my systems:
1) If you don't bet on the team which doesn't cover the spread and instead bet on the other side, you will win 100% of the time(not counting pushes).
2) If you don't bet at all, you will have a 100% system of not losing ever.
3) Also, to quote Sebastian, if a service wants to guarantee a pick, the most honest one it should give is that if you play it and don't win, the GUARANTEE is that you will LOSE.

[TwoTonTony]

DR. BOB NFL...

Jan 21, 12:05 pm
3 Star Selection
***PITTSBURGH 21 New England (-3.0) 14
I never imagined that a team with a 16-1 record would be an underdog at home in a
playoff game, but that's the scenario we have here. When I was asked on Sunday afternoon what I thought the line on this game would be, I said that Pittsburgh should be favored by 3 ½ points, but I'd probably make the line 2 ½ or 3 out of respect for the Patriots.
I was shocked when I saw that New England was favored by 3 points. It's funny how
everyone was questioning the merits of the Patriots prior to last week's game against
the Colts, who most predicted would win that game (I leaned with NE), and a week later
the Pats are being hailed as too good to lose ? even on the road to a 16-1 team. It
strikes me that the public, rather than admitting they were wrong about how good the
Colts are, have simply come to the conclusion that the Patriots must be REALLY good to
have beaten the Colts so easily. Throw in the fact that Pittsburgh struggled to beat the Jets and you have the makings of a ridiculous pointspread in this game. The only reason
the Steelers struggled to beat the Jets was their -2 in turnover margin with one of
those interceptions being returned for an 86 yard touchdown. The Steelers should be
applauded for winning a game in which they were -2 in turnover margin, which is tough to
do, and Pittsburgh out-played the Jets from the line of scrimmage 364 yards (at 4.9
yards per play) to 275 yards (at 4.4 yppl). That game was the only time in Ben
Roethlisberger's 15 starts that the Steelers turned the ball over more than twice (NE
has had 3 or more turnovers 5 times), so it's not likely that the Steelers will have
similar turnover issues this week. These teams match up pretty evenly on both offense
and defense, as both teams have a rushing attack that rates at 0.1 ypr better than
average and a highly efficient quarterback, with Roethlisberger rating at 1.3 yards per pass play better than average (7.2 yppp against teams that allow a combined 5.9 yppp on
defense) and Brady rating at 1.0 yppp better than average (7.0 yppp against teams that
allow 6.0 yppp). Pittsburgh has better defensive numbers than the Patriots for the
season, but New England has actually been better defensively since Ty Law has been
injured, as Law didn't support the run and the Pats defend the run a lot better since
he's been out. New England has yielded just 3.5 ypr and 5.7 yppp (to teams that combine
to average 4.1 ypr and 6.3 yppp) in games without Law, with the exception of their
regular season finale against the 49ers when backups got a lot of snaps. Pittsburgh's
defense is nearly as good, allowing 3.7 ypr and 5.3 yppp (to teams that combine to
average 4.1 ypr and 5.9 yppp) in all games excluding their season finale against
Buffalo. New England was without star running back Corey Dillon in their 20-34 week 8
loss at Pittsburgh and I took the Pats' offensive stats from that game out when I
calculated the math on this game. My math model would still favor the Steelers by 1 ½
points if this were a regular season game, but home field advantage in the playoffs is 2 ½ points higher than in the regular season, so the math projects Pittsburgh by 4 points in this game. The Steelers also apply to a 43-12-1 ATS playoff home team situation and home underdogs are 18-6 ATS in playoff games since 1976. I've been hearing everywhere that Bill Belichick hasn't lost to a quarterback he's facing for a second time in a season, but have people forgotten that Ben Roethlisberger is a quarterback that hasn't lost a football game that he's started in over 2 years? With the line value and the situation strongly favoring the Steelers I will make them a 3-Star Best Bet at +3 points or more. Downgrade Pittsburgh to a 2-Star Best Bet if they become an underdog of less than 3points.

Strong Opinion
PHILADELPHIA (-5.0) 24 Atlanta 13
My math model favored the Falcons by 15 points in last week's 47-17 win over the Rams, which included a whopping 6 point edge in special teams. It turns out that Atlanta's special teams edge last week was underestimated, as the special teams difference in that game was 13.2 points. The Falcons won't enjoy that same type of advantage in this game, as the Eagles' rate at 0.6 points per game better than Atlanta in special teams and my math model favors the Eagles by 11 points after making all the proper adjustments. The Eagles' offense isn't as good without Terrell Owens, and I calculated their pass attack as just average without Owens (based on the yards per passes thrown to averages of the Eagles' receivers last season, compared to what they were this year with T.O.). However, Philly's receiving corps stepped up last week and Donovan McNabb averaged a very impressive 8.4 yards per pass play against a Vikings' defense that allowed 6.7 yppp for the season. I don't expect McNabb to perform nearly as well in this game against a solid Falcons' pass defense that has allowed 5.7 yards per pass play (to teams that combine to
average 6.1 yppp on offense) when pass rushing specialist Rod Coleman is in the lineup (the Falcons' got torched through the air in the 3 games he missed due to lack of a pass rush ? just 1 sack in those 3 games). The Falcons also have a solid run defense (3.8 ypr allowed in Coleman's games, to teams that combine to average 4.0 ypr) and I rate their stop unit at 0.3 yards per play better than average. I calculate Philadelphia's offense also being 0.3 yppl better than average without Owens, so there isn't an edge on either side when the Eagles have the football. Philadelphia's advantage lies with their defense, which has been fantastic since Jeremiah Trotter took over the starting job at middle linebacker in week 10. Since then, and excluding their final 2 regular season games when backups played a large portion of the time, the Eagles have yielded just 3.7 ypr and 5.2 yppp to teams that combine to average 4.2 ypr and 6.1 yppp on offense. Overall, the Eagles' defense rates at 0.7 yppl better than average and they should win the battle against a Falcons' attack that has averaged 5.4 yppl when Michael Vick is at quarterback (against teams that combine to allow 5.3 yppl on defense). The Eagles' great secondary will be able to cover the Falcons' receivers man-to-man, which will allow them to focus on defending the run. Vick is certainly capable of taking over a game, but most of the damage he has done in his career has come against mediocre and bad defensive teams and he's struggled against good defensive teams (most notably the Buccaneers). The cold conditions in Philadelphia should also inhibit Vick's game, as he's struggled throwing the ball in the only two cold weather games (40 degrees or lower) that he's played in during his career (just 4.8 yppp) while running for a total of just 51 yards in those two games. Vick also doesn't run as well on natural grass, averaging 6.5 ypr on grass ? compared to 8.1 ypr on artificial turf. Donovan McNabb, by contrast, has played better during his career as the temperature has dropped. McNabb has averaged 0.5 yppp higher than his career average in 11 cold weather games. There are situations favoring
both sides in this game, as the Eagles apply to a 50-15 ATS playoff home team situation while also applying to a 1-13 ATS angle. Also, the Falcons' 47-17 win last week is not a good omen for them, as teams that score 35 points or more in their divisional round playoff win are 0-9 ATS on the road in the Conference Championship Game. Also, teams that score more than 35 points in any playoff victory of 7 points or more are just 4-14-1 ATS on the road when not getting at least 10 points (including the Colts last week). Those angles combine to favor the Eagles by about 2 ½ points, which is the same as additional home field advantage that is already incorporated into my math model for playoff games. So, the math prediction of Eagles by 11 points is what I'll go with and Philadelphia has a profitable 56.7 % chance of covering at the current pointspread of -5 points, which is good enough to make the Eagles a Strong Opinion in this game. Upgrade Philadelphia to a 2-Star Best Bet if they become a favorite of 4 points or less.

Just heard the forecast from a meterologist for the game....winds 35-45 mph and wind chill 0 to -10 below.....just thought i would alert

[Spark]

Alex Smart
2* Heat under

Jim Fiest
5* Pacers
4* Bucks

[aces r wild]

spark or OBE

I know you guys don't like to give out addy's,but you know i have info i'm not posting.So its up to you guys

[TwoTonTony]

Hey Coverboy-what about my systems:
1) If you don't bet on the team which doesn't cover the spread and instead bet on the other side, you will win 100% of the time(not counting pushes).
2) If you don't bet at all, you will have a 100% system of not losing ever.
3) Also, to quote Sebastian, if a service wants to guarantee a pick, the most honest one it should give is that if you play it and don't win, the GUARANTEE is that you will LOSE.

Sebastian should not quote guarentees...although he has been liberal in giving picks if you lose, what good are they if he is streaky....and part #2 in his original superlock guarentee it was.."if not profitable after 90 days your money back....it has now been amended to read until you get in the black....i think he may be back to .500ish, but he was feeling the heat when he lost 9 games in a row and he DID NOT want to issue checks and the change in policy shows he had NO intentions of doing so....talk is cheap!!

[Blackbeard]

Billy Coleman
4* Seattle
3* Nets, Pistons, Rockets under

[Spark]

Damn that was good! I never thought Spark/Superman could be any better but now that he is reading people's minds I can't wait to see what happens next! Seriously though thanks Spark, I know everyone is on the Knicks and that is usually never good, but now thanks to the LT Game of the Night on the Knicks you can count me in!



OBE

That was good OBE ... hahaha Good Luck buddy


Big Al
3* Phoenix, Charolette

Bill Coleman
4* Seattle
3* Nets, Pistons, Rockets under

[Spark]

NSA
20* Nets

Champion
5* Golden State
3* Nets over

[Blackbeard]

NSA
20* Nets

[Spark]

Champion
5* Golden State
3* Nets over

[Spark]

Sorry beard .. did not notice your posts partner ...

[CoverBoy]

Savage

Thanks for sharing those insights.

EXCELLENT !!!

[GAVEL]

Triple Crown Sports?

They have a 5* best bet tonight, thanks in advance if anyone can post it.

[Blackbeard]

Spark buddy I was thinkin same thing, we both posted at same time, too funny