Tweet
Unfortunately the rule does suck, although appears called correctly according to rule. Personally I think after watching games the last few weeks I think different refs, different outcome. Not cause they are on the take but because of personal interpretaion of the rules. Some of you may have noticed as well that there have been more Reversals by the replay review as of late that seem to take in certain 'Assumptions' instead of the clear evidence. Another good example happened in the late game yesterday when Indy punt returner fumbled the ball and Denver recovered, call was reversed because he was down by contact yet no angle provided a clear view that he did. I think not only should the rules be revisited but how they are reviewed and what constitutes 'Stands", 'Confirmed', 'Reversed'. Otherwise is replay just a waste? Just my 2 cents.
Comment