FrankB:
Now your logic makes no sense. You admit that he picks 55% winners, but you cringe when he is on the same side of you and would not play his picks if they were free (which they are--right here). That is completely illogical because he obviously wins over the long haul if he picks 55% winners. Do you honestly think any service hits 55% winners over the long term such as more than a few months? I doubt it. From everything I have seen or read, 55 percent over the long term is solid and I would never be dissatisfied with that. When I look at monitors I rarely see any service that hits much better than that over the course of just one season (which I would consider the short term) let alone over the course of a whole year in all sports.
Now your logic makes no sense. You admit that he picks 55% winners, but you cringe when he is on the same side of you and would not play his picks if they were free (which they are--right here). That is completely illogical because he obviously wins over the long haul if he picks 55% winners. Do you honestly think any service hits 55% winners over the long term such as more than a few months? I doubt it. From everything I have seen or read, 55 percent over the long term is solid and I would never be dissatisfied with that. When I look at monitors I rarely see any service that hits much better than that over the course of just one season (which I would consider the short term) let alone over the course of a whole year in all sports.
Comment