Colts under 19- for 6 units !!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
huge 2nd half play IN THE COLTS GAME
Collapse
X
-
I dont understand the logic of doubling up when your original under wager should already be a winner...why not just take the winner and be done with it....why risk more to screw yourself twice...is this something you would suggest regularly Chunger
SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
For example lets say the 2nd half goes over but you win your original under for the game wager you end up losing money because you put MORE on the 2nd half over when you could have just took you original under winner considering you like the 2nd half under so much...I dont get it....Originally posted by Chado1 View PostI dont understand the logic of doubling up when your original under wager should already be a winner...why not just take the winner and be done with it....why risk more to screw yourself twice...is this something you would suggest regularly Chunger

SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
GUYS,I HAD THE OVER LAST NIGHT FOR A BIG PLAY,it was a good play,i got nervous watching the first half and shit myself,i have told ldawg this many a time,"scared money ain't got no home gambling",never let fear enter the equation when gambling,it cost me last night-IT WANT HAPPEN AGAIN !!Originally posted by WayneChung View Postthis bet suckedDON'T YOU EAT THE YELLOW SNOW !!
PS-MARVIN LOVES SPLIT SALAD !! 
Comment
-
See now that I can understand...but what I dont get is tripling your original under for the game wager for the 2nd half under ALSO....when it is already on pace to give you an initial under winner...putting yourself in a double loss situation is something I would have no clue as to why...Originally posted by myrjimmy3 View Postim in the same boat guys was big on the over got scared and went just as big on second half under...o well at least i only lost some juiceSOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
yeah i agree with you 100 % i think chunger said he had the over though?Originally posted by Chado1 View PostSee now that I can understand...but what I dont get is tripling your original under for the game wager for the 2nd half under ALSO....when it is already on pace to give you an initial under winner...putting yourself in a double loss situation is something I would have no clue as to why...twitter: @JumpouttheJim
Comment
-
No he had the under and tripled up on 2nd half under...if he had the over for the game I wouldnt have even questioned it...I am assuming he felt even better about the under at HT and wanted to win even more off it...but makes no sense to not just leave your initial wager that is looking good at HT and throw even more on it at a lesser total (converted to 32.5) when you already have 40.5 for the game...Originally posted by myrjimmy3 View Postyeah i agree with you 100 % i think chunger said he had the over though?
SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
my son,you don't go back and read your threads,in my thread and in your thread,i told you i came back on the over large !!Originally posted by Chado1 View PostNo he had the under and tripled up on 2nd half under...if he had the over for the game I wouldnt have even questioned it...I am assuming he felt even better about the under at HT and wanted to win even more off it...but makes no sense to not just leave your initial wager that is looking good at HT and throw even more on it at a lesser total (converted to 32.5) when you already have 40.5 for the game...
DON'T YOU EAT THE YELLOW SNOW !!
PS-MARVIN LOVES SPLIT SALAD !! 
Comment
-
Yea my bad I did not know you changed you under wager so now I totally understand what you were trying to do at HT as the over looked brutal...and sometimes cant understand Chunganese..Originally posted by WayneChung View Postmy son,you don't go back and read your threads,in my thread and in your thread,i told you i came back on the over large !!
SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
Comment