Looking at tonight's NBA game it is clear to me that i must be either a capper and go with Boston or a Contrarian and go with Los Angeles. Not looking or caring about the rest of the public and what they wager, it is really that cut and dry. Do i look at this game on paper and go with what it clearly shows me OR do i look at that, look at this line, and say something is fishy here?
As gamblers, we all tend to over think things most of the time and most that don't think they do, probably do it more than others. How many times have you lost a wager in which you went back and forth on the side, ended up losing the wager, and was pissed because you knew you had the right side to begin with? It happens all the time.
Looking at tonight's game, i'm puzzled by the line and my 1st instinct was to say the line is too high. I'm one who actually thinks Boston blowing that big lead late the other night may help them more than the Lakers. Getting complacent and blowing that lead may keep them from thinking this will be easier than it is. A 25 point win may have had Boston feeling too relaxed heading back to L.A. and now i do not think that is the case.
I'm not sure which way i am going tonight but based on the facts below, i'm leaning towards Boston. Most know i "Cap" games and i rarely take the contrarian approach. Many others like the contrarian approach and do very well with it. It is all about what you are comfortable doing with your money. I see a few people already taking the contrarian approach and pounding L.A.
Capping
--------
Boston had the Best road record in the NBA this season with 31 Wins. Nobody else in the League even had 28.
Boston Won their only meeting with the Lakers in Los Angeles by 19 points. It was the Lakers worst home loss of the season. No, they didn't have Gasol but they did have Bynum and a nice record. Please do not tell me L.A. was struggling then either because they won the 4 games before playing Boston and they went on to win 7 more in a row after that 19 point home loss. In a 12 game stretch, it was their only loss. The Lakers started (26-11) and 2 of those losses (Both by DD) were to Boston, so i don't want to hear how bad they were before Gasol. With Bynum, they were still playing very well.
Boston has played 50 road games this year including the Playoffs (Where they struggled), and they only lost 5 games total by 10 or more points. That is 1 out of every 10 or a measely 10%. The line is -9.5
Boston is (4-0) against L.A. this season and Kobe has not reached his season average in any of the 4 games, only scoring 30 once. His FG % against Boston is his lowest vs any opponent this season.
In the postseason Boston has been questioned on the road struggling in the 1st two rounds but they got back on track winning 2 of 3 in Detroit in their most recent series.
Contrarian
------------
Plain & Simple. This line is fishy.
The Lakers are (8-0) @ Home this postseason.
In 2 home games vs Denver they were only favored by -8.5 and -8.5 in each game. The Lakers won both by 14 and 15.
In the Utah series at home, the Lakers were favored by -6.5, -8 and -8.5 in 3 games. L.A. covered 2 of 3.
Against S.A. in 3 home games L.A. was favored by -7.5, -6.5 and -7.5. The Lakers covered 2 of 3.
Why in the world is L.A. favored by more against Boston (-9.5) than any other team they have played at home in the post season? Denver?? San Antonio is another team Boston beat twice during the regular season and they never got +9 once in that series.
Boston has not been a dog all year of a spread higher than +6. Think about that. Not once have they received +7 or more points in a game all season and in the finals after being up (2-0) against a team that they are (4-0) against, now they are bloated all the way up to +9.5???
Boston had the best road record this season and they are (4-0) against L.A. but the line is -9.5???
It would be very easy to go either way in this game and use the above facts in your argument. My question to you guys is which side of the fence are you sitting on tonight? Capper or Contrarian?
Hopefully the info above helps you decide.
As gamblers, we all tend to over think things most of the time and most that don't think they do, probably do it more than others. How many times have you lost a wager in which you went back and forth on the side, ended up losing the wager, and was pissed because you knew you had the right side to begin with? It happens all the time.
Looking at tonight's game, i'm puzzled by the line and my 1st instinct was to say the line is too high. I'm one who actually thinks Boston blowing that big lead late the other night may help them more than the Lakers. Getting complacent and blowing that lead may keep them from thinking this will be easier than it is. A 25 point win may have had Boston feeling too relaxed heading back to L.A. and now i do not think that is the case.
I'm not sure which way i am going tonight but based on the facts below, i'm leaning towards Boston. Most know i "Cap" games and i rarely take the contrarian approach. Many others like the contrarian approach and do very well with it. It is all about what you are comfortable doing with your money. I see a few people already taking the contrarian approach and pounding L.A.
Capping
--------
Boston had the Best road record in the NBA this season with 31 Wins. Nobody else in the League even had 28.
Boston Won their only meeting with the Lakers in Los Angeles by 19 points. It was the Lakers worst home loss of the season. No, they didn't have Gasol but they did have Bynum and a nice record. Please do not tell me L.A. was struggling then either because they won the 4 games before playing Boston and they went on to win 7 more in a row after that 19 point home loss. In a 12 game stretch, it was their only loss. The Lakers started (26-11) and 2 of those losses (Both by DD) were to Boston, so i don't want to hear how bad they were before Gasol. With Bynum, they were still playing very well.
Boston has played 50 road games this year including the Playoffs (Where they struggled), and they only lost 5 games total by 10 or more points. That is 1 out of every 10 or a measely 10%. The line is -9.5
Boston is (4-0) against L.A. this season and Kobe has not reached his season average in any of the 4 games, only scoring 30 once. His FG % against Boston is his lowest vs any opponent this season.
In the postseason Boston has been questioned on the road struggling in the 1st two rounds but they got back on track winning 2 of 3 in Detroit in their most recent series.
Contrarian
------------
Plain & Simple. This line is fishy.
The Lakers are (8-0) @ Home this postseason.
In 2 home games vs Denver they were only favored by -8.5 and -8.5 in each game. The Lakers won both by 14 and 15.
In the Utah series at home, the Lakers were favored by -6.5, -8 and -8.5 in 3 games. L.A. covered 2 of 3.
Against S.A. in 3 home games L.A. was favored by -7.5, -6.5 and -7.5. The Lakers covered 2 of 3.
Why in the world is L.A. favored by more against Boston (-9.5) than any other team they have played at home in the post season? Denver?? San Antonio is another team Boston beat twice during the regular season and they never got +9 once in that series.
Boston has not been a dog all year of a spread higher than +6. Think about that. Not once have they received +7 or more points in a game all season and in the finals after being up (2-0) against a team that they are (4-0) against, now they are bloated all the way up to +9.5???
Boston had the best road record this season and they are (4-0) against L.A. but the line is -9.5???
It would be very easy to go either way in this game and use the above facts in your argument. My question to you guys is which side of the fence are you sitting on tonight? Capper or Contrarian?
Hopefully the info above helps you decide.
![Smilie](http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Comment