It is never full proof -- the last 3 days are proof of it. If it was I wouldnt be posting on this board, I would own a casino in Vegas and an island in the carib.
But trying to fade the public as much as I can has kept me gambling for over 15 years -- I know close to 100 of people over the course of those 15 years that have gotton buried and have quit
Betting against the public will keep you at 55 % throught the entire year
Like ronnie said - books took a bath tonight with Louisville and both totals in the college games
BUT .... books cleaned up in the NBA with Phoenix not covering ( 80% on phoenix !!!!) , cleve not covering, and portland not covering
Speaking of books -- lets not forget .. they also make a ton of money on gimmick bets such as parlays, robins and teasers
The same guys that had Noth Carolina tonight might have also had them in a parlay with Phoenix.
Fading the public is not fullproof !!!!! But if it gives me an edge, I will take it. In 15 yrs of gambling , I have had many more winning years than losing years and I think my betting "style" is an attrubute to that
Lets not forget if the public didnt win EVER - there would be no one left to gamble
It has its streaks like everything else
"Sharps" or "faders" kicked ass in the confrence tourneys
The "public or"squares" kicked ass the first 2 days of the tourney
it switched again and the 'sharps" kicked ass last weekend in the round of 32 games
then a switch again the last 3 nights where the "squares" are kicking ass
Now .... if fading the public gets you at least 55 % winners over the long haul --- wouldnt you rather be on that side??
.
But trying to fade the public as much as I can has kept me gambling for over 15 years -- I know close to 100 of people over the course of those 15 years that have gotton buried and have quit
Betting against the public will keep you at 55 % throught the entire year
Like ronnie said - books took a bath tonight with Louisville and both totals in the college games
BUT .... books cleaned up in the NBA with Phoenix not covering ( 80% on phoenix !!!!) , cleve not covering, and portland not covering
Speaking of books -- lets not forget .. they also make a ton of money on gimmick bets such as parlays, robins and teasers
The same guys that had Noth Carolina tonight might have also had them in a parlay with Phoenix.
Fading the public is not fullproof !!!!! But if it gives me an edge, I will take it. In 15 yrs of gambling , I have had many more winning years than losing years and I think my betting "style" is an attrubute to that
Lets not forget if the public didnt win EVER - there would be no one left to gamble
It has its streaks like everything else
"Sharps" or "faders" kicked ass in the confrence tourneys
The "public or"squares" kicked ass the first 2 days of the tourney
it switched again and the 'sharps" kicked ass last weekend in the round of 32 games
then a switch again the last 3 nights where the "squares" are kicking ass
Now .... if fading the public gets you at least 55 % winners over the long haul --- wouldnt you rather be on that side??
.
Comment