Turn -110 to +131

[thesandman]

Instead of playing any of your straight plays at the usual -110 to win 100, this is how to play them risking 110 to win 144.

This is as close to risk free as you can get. Parley your ATS play with Stanford on the MoneyLine tonight.

Why Stanford. Because they are at home playing Oregon where they are 10-1 this season, the only loss to UCLA. Now here comes the good part.

OREGON HAS LOST THE LAST 21 GAMES AT STANFORD. They haven't won at Stanford since 1986. Why should tonight be any different, especially since this is one of Stanford's better teams. It should NOT be different. Put the juice in your favor tonight.

[MrReporter]

I love that Bay Area knowlegde Sandman! Goodwork sir!

[birdog]

and if Stanford loses are you going to cover my bet if my other -110 team won!!1

[Chado1]

BOL tonight Sandy!!!

[Chado1]

especially since this is one of Stanford's better teams.

They have had way better teams....although they are solid as usual again this year I believe this is actually one of their weaker teams than years past....

[Kaptain]

gl SandMan

[Kaptain]

Chado

They have had way better teams....although they are solid as usual again this year I believe this is actually one of their weaker teams than years past....

and yet another un solicited infinite opinion from Chado....what stats do you have to contradict SandMans statement....The Cards are after all 18-3, 10-1 at home, to UCLA no less.....he didn't say they were the best team ever, so why in the hell would you inject, "I think they'vs had better"...EZ does it Chado.....

In one statemnt, a while back, you state you don't really know BasketBall like you do hockey, and then you always go in someones thread, and state a different opinion....why ?????????

[Chado1]

and yet another un solicited infinite opinion from Chado....what stats do you have to contradict SandMans statement....The Cards are after all 18-3, 10-1 at home, to UCLA no less.....he didn't say they were the best team ever, so why in the hell would you inject, "I think they'vs had better"...EZ does it Chado.....

In one statemnt, a while back, you state you don't really know BasketBall like you do hockey, and then you always go in someones thread, and state a different opinion....why ?????????

Your right Kapt...I shouldnt have even bothered posting that and right before I did I second guessed it...I am gonna try to re-evaluate things like that when I notice them before I post from now on....thanks...

[bryce]

Best of luck Sand--very good reasoning and capping for that matter!!

[thesandman]

Thanks Kapt. I was already to start typing and you did it for me, although you did leave one thing for me to say.

STANFORD IS RANKED NUMBER 9 THIS WEEK

[thesandman]

birdog asks

and if Stanford loses are you going to cover my bet if my other -110 team won!!

Only if you will give me your winnings if Stanford wins.

[SustainDan]

Sandman I fully respect this as I think Stanford will win...But this is just as risky as betting the Patriots moneyline.... Your going to throw in a -500 moneyline into a parlay it is not the smartest move. That is just my opinion and I fully respect your reasoning, but honestly in college ball stats are garbage. Hope stanford wins for you....

PS: DO you know where the hell Rip is??? I miss his fades he used to have. Those were big money.

[MtrCtyPimp]

Precisely said Dan.......Im not gonna say anything but where are all the post gamers who said the Pats ML was a stupid bet.....

Ill tell you this to each his own and I hope Stanford does win but a post like this is just as good as saying play Stanford tonight -500

PEACE

[Spearit]

Stanford sure looks good. Nice work Sandman

[thesandman]

Bet New England On the Money Line?? NEVER

I know the history between Stanford and Oregon and there was no chance tonights game would have been different. A 29 point Stanford win proved that. Did I play New England on the MoneyLine because they had won 18 in a row. See for yourself.

36) BET ID=237700026
Straight Wager 02/03/08 17:20 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants(NewYork) 17
Patriots(NewEngland) 14 02/03/08(18:35 ET)
Giants(NewYork) +13 (-120)
Bought 0.5 point(s)

37) BET ID=237698780
Straight Wager 02/03/08 17:18 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants vs Patriots - Adjusted Line and Total
Giants 17
Patriots 14 02/03/08(18:40 ET)
Giants +7.5 (+150)

38) BET ID=237697549
Straight Wager 02/03/08 17:16 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants vs Patriots - Adjusted Line and Total
Giants 17
Patriots 14 02/03/08(18:40 ET)
Giants +3.5 (+220)

39) BET ID=237695744
Straight Wager 02/03/08 17:14 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants(NewYork) 17
Patriots(NewEngland) 14 02/03/08(18:35 ET)
Giants(NewYork) +370

40) BET ID=237670159
Straight Wager 02/03/08 16:30 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
1Giants 1stHalf 3
1Patriots 1stHalf 7 02/03/08(18:35 ET)
1Giants +7 (-105)

41) BET ID=237668017
Straight Wager 02/03/08 16:26 ET
bet Result: Wager Won
zzzMavericks4Q 16
zzzPistons4Q 24 02/03/08(23:59 ET)
zzzPistons4Q +2.5

42) BET ID=237662282
Straight Wager 02/03/08 16:13 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants1Q 3
Patriots1Q 0 02/03/08(18:30 ET)
Giants1Q +3 (+110)

43) BET ID=237650732
Straight Wager 02/03/08 15:46 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants(NewYork) 17
Patriots(NewEngland) 14 02/03/08(18:35 ET)
Giants(NewYork) +12

44) BET ID=237639033
Straight Wager 02/03/08 15:14 ET
bet to win Result: Wager Won
Giants(NewYork) 17
Patriots(NewEngland) 14 02/03/08(18:35 ET)
Giants(NewYork) +12