Originally posted by 3ebRocks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SATURDAYS CARD W / A GOY AND TWO 10* 's ( 33 - 12 This Year )!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 3ebRocksThats all fine what you said and I am glad you were on the UGA Harold, but I really wasnt questioning anything. I was wondering his motives or betting strategy as it may. If he doesnt want to tell me then thats fine and understandable. But I didnt insult him in any way or even disagree with his pick. I stated reasons why it confused me is all. In fact I think I even complimented him once or twice. So spare me your melodramatic ass kissing. Please. You think for your self and he will think for himself and I will think for myself. Probably works out better that way.Last edited by harold_bush; 11-24-2007, 10:47 PM.
Comment
-
Harold the post you put up in response to mine is one. And yea, the Noles suck. Dont you think I know that? Should I not be a fan because of it?
And wsdawg, what exactly did I say that caused you to call me an idiot? Seriously? Somebody you dont even know who at no point was directing any type of conversation at you. Yet you called me an idiot. Im just curious to know why?
And I understand now that somehow I insulted this whole forum by asking a legitimate question to and about GG. But why? Somebody please tell me at which point I disrespected him, his picks, his knowledge, his strategy, his record or anything like that? I asked a question. A legitimate question at that. He was and is under no obligation to answer and thats all well and good, but why do you three four or five guys all come up here and insult me in response to my question to GG? Seriously. Is it because I should have already known that the comment he made about the GTech game was made sarcastically? Because clearly I didnt and you would know that from reading my post. Or was it just that you feel I have no right to ask him what he bases his plays on? And if that is indeed the case, isnt it him that should tell me that? Or at the least, not get insulted just for asking? Just curious."The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it." George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
3eb, on this forum in someone elses thread, all you can do is agree or say goood luck and move on. NOT lmao. Some plays are good and streaks happen, play them hard or not. But don't question the picks or the lines that sometime are posted. GC is mainly a pretty good handicapper. I had Tech myself.
Comment
-
Classic I have to disagree with you.....I think there should be as much debate as possible before a game starts but after a game is finished do not come in and say 'what the heck was one thinking'....'I would like to know'.
The line was off in this game and way off and given this situation 10 times with 10 funky lines....the team that gets pounded in general will lose 2 outta 3....history proves it....also most games that get bet at a 65% clip or more tend to only hit at around a 45% or so..this isnt reinventing the wheel....its just what history has shown us.
Now with that said the game still has to be played on the field and anything can happen.
IMO I enjoy debate and welcome questioning all over the forum...thats what this is all about....but IMO I think the timing should be before a game starts....thats all
PEACE
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3ebRocks
And I understand now that somehow I insulted this whole forum by asking a legitimate question to and about GG. But why? Somebody please tell me at which point I disrespected him, his picks, his knowledge, his strategy, his record or anything like that? I asked a question. A legitimate question at that. He was and is under no obligation to answer and thats all well and good, but why do you three four or five guys all come up here and insult me in response to my question to GG? Seriously. Is it because I should have already known that the comment he made about the GTech game was made sarcastically? Because clearly I didnt and you would know that from reading my post. Or was it just that you feel I have no right to ask him what he bases his plays on? And if that is indeed the case, isnt it him that should tell me that? Or at the least, not get insulted just for asking? Just curious."The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.
Comment
-
You know I do agree with you guys in that I probably should have said what i said before the game. Timing was bad. But I didnt realize who's thread it was mattered all that much and since it apparently does, then I apologize for that too. But I have to stress that I didnt DISAGREE with anything. I asked what goes into the picks thinking that if I am wavering on a certain play and decide to go with GG, because he seems to be one of the most respected guys on here, I would like to have known what the person that I am leaning on bases his picks on. And again, if he didnt want to tell me or I dont have a right to know then thats acceptable coming from him. But I dont think it was an unreasonable question and I certainly didnt expect to be bombarded by a bunch of people that act like I just insulted their mother, wife, child etc. And Spearit I did let it go, but everytime I come up here and say that I meant no disrespect, which ironically I said in the original post, I keep getting told that Im an idiot and have no right to question anyone when in fact, yes I was questioning the method to which he does his picking in general, but in no way questioning the specific game. I didnt have Georgia or Georgia Tech and other than rooting for big plays on this forum, could really have cared less who won. So I certainly wasnt trying to hang anyone. And all that being said, if GG just came up on here and told me to F off, that would be 10x more understandable than these guys going off on me when all I was trying to do was ask a question. Everyone is saying I questioned his strategy. Maybe you should all go back and look what I wrote and you will see that I didnt question it. I asked what it was. There is a difference. Big difference. I threw those stats on there to make a point as to find out if stats like those or any others are part of his thinking or not. Doesnt mean I am questioning one way or another, means I am trying to find out just that."The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it." George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3ebRocksYou know I do agree with you guys in that I probably should have said what i said before the game. Timing was bad. But I didnt realize who's thread it was mattered all that much and since it apparently does, then I apologize for that too. But I have to stress that I didnt DISAGREE with anything. I asked what goes into the picks thinking that if I am wavering on a certain play and decide to go with GG, because he seems to be one of the most respected guys on here, I would like to have known what the person that I am leaning on bases his picks on. And again, if he didnt want to tell me or I dont have a right to know then thats acceptable coming from him. But I dont think it was an unreasonable question and I certainly didnt expect to be bombarded by a bunch of people that act like I just insulted their mother, wife, child etc. And Spearit I did let it go, but everytime I come up here and say that I meant no disrespect, which ironically I said in the original post, I keep getting told that Im an idiot and have no right to question anyone when in fact, yes I was questioning the method to which he does his picking in general, but in no way questioning the specific game. I didnt have Georgia or Georgia Tech and other than rooting for big plays on this forum, could really have cared less who won. So I certainly wasnt trying to hang anyone. And all that being said, if GG just came up on here and told me to F off, that would be 10x more understandable than these guys going off on me when all I was trying to do was ask a question. Everyone is saying I questioned his strategy. Maybe you should all go back and look what I wrote and you will see that I didnt question it. I asked what it was. There is a difference. Big difference. I threw those stats on there to make a point as to find out if stats like those or any others are part of his thinking or not. Doesnt mean I am questioning one way or another, means I am trying to find out just that.
3Eb its a legitimate question...and we both agree the timing was wrong, thats all....GG doesnt just fade the public blindly but I would say thats 90% of his game...keep firing questions at anyone you like man but if you as me just do it before the game starts because after the game is over and its a loser anyone who might have tailed might take it the wrong way.
GL man and no harm no foul
PEACE
Comment
-
MIXED BAG -
GOY IS A LOSER
10* GO 2-0 NOW 35 -12 THIS YEAR
9-11-2 OVERALL IN COLLEGE , BUT THE TOP PLAYS WENT 3-5-1
THE MIDDLE OF MY CARD WHICH IS USUALLY AVERAGE CAME THRY STRONG FOR ME AND PREVWNTED A DISASTEROUS DAY
WENT 5 -1-1 IN THE NBA TO SAVE THE DAY
OVERALL 14 - 12 -3 ON THE DAY -- HAVENT DONE THE UNITS BUT SHOULD BE AROUND EVEN
20* GEORGIA TECH + 3 1/2-------LOSER
10* WASH ST + 7 ( -120 )--------------WINNER
10* W. VIRGINIA - 18 ----------------WINNER
9* VIRGINIA + 3 1/2-----------------LOSER
9* ALABAMA + 5----------LOSER
8* PITT + 9 ------------LOSER
8* MIAMI FL. + 14 ------- PUSH
8* FRESNO ST + 1--------WINNER
8* KENTUCKY - 2 1/2 ---------LOSER
7* VANDY + 1--------------LOSER
7* KENT ST + 1----------LOSER
7* UTAH + 4 1/2----------LOSER
6* S. CAROLINA + 3 ---WINNER
5* UCLA + 2-------------WINNER
5* FLORIDA ST + 14-----LOSER
5* OKLAHOMA - 13 1/2----WINNER
5* MIZZOU + 2-------------WINNER
5* SMU + 7 1/2--------------WINNER
3* MARYLAND + 2 1/2 ---------WINNER
4* SYRACUSE + 21-------------PUSH
3* UL LAFFAYETTE + 3-------------LOSER
3* FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL +11 1/2----------LOSER
NBA
9* Miami + 7 1/2 -----LOSER
9* Houston ML - 210-------WINNER
7* Milwaukee + 4------------WINNER
5* Houston - 5----------WINNER
4* Memphis - 6---------------PUSH
3* Philly + 3 1/2-----------WINNER
3* Charllote + 8 1/2---------WINNER
Comment
Comment