BOL Chado - lets go blackhawks!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chado's NHL Picks for Wednesday!!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEKChado - if you were forced to pick.., who would you take in the Nashville / Anahiem game?
SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
A Chado three unit play when there is nothing else to play. Your last 3 unit winner sold me on this one, except for one little problem. The line is now up to CHICAGO -135. Ouch, for someone who is allergic to laying juice. And I can't find anything worth parleying them to.
So,my friend, am I right in thinking you are looking for more than a one goal win, by making Chicago a three unit play. I'm thinking of playing Chicago and laying the juice to win 200, while at the same time playing Chicago -1.5 goals at +210. 270 to win 200 at a PK. and 200 to win 410 -1.5 goals. Basically I'm playing Chicago minus one goal. Chado, am I asking for too much expecting a win by two goals or more.Last edited by thesandman; 10-17-2007, 06:28 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thesandmanA Chado three unit play when there is nothing else to play. Your last 3 unit winner sold me on this one, except for one little problem. The line is now up to CHICAGO -135. Ouch, for someone who is allergic to laying juice. And I can't find anything worth parleying them to.
So,my friend, am I right in thinking you are looking for more than a one goal win, by making Chicago a three unit play. I'm thinking of playing Chicago and laying the juice to win, while at the same time playing Chicago -1.5 goals at +210. 270 to win 200 at a PK. and 200 to win 410 -1.5 goals. Basically I'm playing Chicago minus one goal. Chado, am I asking for too much expecting a win by two goals or more.
One being if the game goes to OT or a shootout (which I dont expect happening in this game) the bet is already a loser....
Second, on the flip side of things, taking the underdog +1.5 is heavy juice and the team can be covering the one goal and easily end up losing at the end of the game by 2 gaols on an empty netter.....
Also with the total in this game being as low as you will see for regular season game @ only 5.0 and myself leaning to the under aswell I would suggest to not do it that way specifically in this situation....if it was a game with a higher total and I thought it may go over I would say do it....
If you REALLY dont want to lay the juice as I am sensing you dont the only other option I can suggest would be to take Chicago @ +125 to win in regualtion only....it loses if it goes to OT or a shootout...they have to win in regulation....
Hope that helps....SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
heads up
just a heads up for you chado I know it is late but yahoo sports says turco will be back in net for dallas, plus the backup Norrena is starting for columbus. you know I'm rolling with you on chicago, I also took the penguins -150
any thoughts on pens game.
Comment
-
Chado, I hear you but are you thinking I was looking at also taking Chicago +1.5 goals. It looks that is what you are saying and yeah that would be a disaster. I was thinking of playing Chicago MINUS 1.5 goals. I break even if they just win the game, win more if they do win by 2 goals and lose everything anyway if they lost or tie the game. But I would lose everything if I played them just to win the game and they lost.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chado1If I had a gun to my head I would take Nashville +170 in hopes they can turn it around as I think -180 for the Ducks is too pricey...more confident play would be on the under however....why do you ask Double G?
Comment
-
Chado. Just to make one thing clear. My two plays on Chicago would each by for half of what I would play, if I laid the juice and played them to just win. I would not lose anymore should they lose than I would lose, just playing the one play at -135. My mistake would be if they win by one goal, when I would end up just even.
Comment
-
I Did It Anyway
Chado. THis is how I played it. I'm playing it for three units each way, instead of playing the game straight up for six units. In essense, I'm playing the game minus 1 for a total of 600.
Straight Wager 10/17/07 19:03 ET
bet 300.00 to win 630.00 Result: Pending
Blues(StLouis)
Blackhawks(Chicago) 10/17/07(20:35 ET)
Blackhawks(Chicago) -1.5 (+210)
2) BET ID=223308904
Straight Wager 10/17/07 19:02 ET
bet 405.00 to win 300.00 Result: Pending
Blues(StLouis)
Blackhawks(Chicago) 10/17/07(20:35 ET)
Blackhawks(Chicago) -135
Comment
Comment