San Diego got screwed!!!

[rented mule]

San Diego has nothing to gripe about. The best pitcher in the NL gets rocked and the all time saves leader blows a 3 run lead.

I feel bad for Hoffman because he was a stand up guy after the game and took responsibility, but the Padres dug their own graves.

[TheRook]

San Diego has nothing to gripe about. The best pitcher in the NL gets rocked and the all time saves leader blows a 3 run lead.

I feel bad for Hoffman because he was a stand up guy after the game and took responsibility, but the Padres dug their own graves.

Hoffman was a big stand up guy last night.

I give him many props for that.

[Chado1]

San Diego has nothing to gripe about. The best pitcher in the NL gets rocked and the all time saves leader blows a 3 run lead.

I feel bad for Hoffman because he was a stand up guy after the game and took responsibility, but the Padres dug their own graves.

Best post of the year award goes to muler!!!!!

[Chado1]

Hoffman was a big stand up guy last night.

I give him many props for that.

HEY YOU!!!

Get back to capping todays soccer----->>>

[ericeric]

All due respect....but only 10 to 1 on one of the greatest closers of all time to blow the game? I know you won, but I would think the odds would have been better. With a two run lead I would expect that to be 20 or 30 to 1 at least. Congrats!!!

It was actually 27 to win 300, so a little better...but hoffman is a 91% closer...also has a 5+ era at coors...I jumped all over it, especially as he's been nothing close to the best closer ever lately.

[Chado1]

It was actually 27 to win 300, so a little better...but hoffman is a 91% closer...also has a 5+ era at coors...I jumped all over it, especially as he's been nothing close to the best closer ever lately.

Keep taking teams that are down by 2 in the bottom of an extra inning vs. veteran closers and you'll be broke before you know it.....

[savage1]

To change the subject slightly, I think Rockies represent great value at +975 to win WS;they seem like a team of destiny to at the very least get to the WS, and looked quite impressive in winning 2 of 3 in Boston against the Red Sox earlier this year.

[Chado1]

To change the subject slightly, I think Rockies represent great value at +975 to win WS;they seem like a team of destiny to at the very least get to the WS, and looked quite impressive in winning 2 of 3 in Boston against the Red Sox earlier this year.

Whats the odds for them to make it to the world series (win the NL) ?

[savage1]

Here you go with all of the odds:

ODDS TO WIN 2007 MLB WORLD SERIES
# Money Line
1900 ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS +1000
1903 BOSTON RED SOX +295
1904 CHICAGO CUBS +475
1907 CLEVELAND INDIANS +795
1908 COLORADO ROCKIES +975
1913 LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM +725
1918 NEW YORK YANKEES +290
1920 PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES +825
12:00 PM10 /03 /07WIN 2007 AMERICAN LEAGUE PENNANT
# Money Line
2001 BOSTON RED SOX +185
2003 CLEVELAND INDIANS +410
2006 LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM +360
2008 NEW YORK YANKEES +190
12:00 PM10 /03 /07WIN 2007 NATIONAL LEAGUE PENNANT
# Money Line
2100 ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS +350
2102 CHICAGO CUBS +210
2104 COLORADO ROCKIES +305
2110 PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES +215

Judging by these odds, there is no point in NL even showing up to play in WS. lol

[GOLDENGREEK]

Two ENTIRELY diffrent things! If the right call was made on the homerun the game would have been played entirely diffrent. Every situation, manager decision, pitching change, hit and runs, etc, etc, would have been diffrent. Completely diffrent when something happens in the middle of the game, compared to a bad call at the end of a game that decides the outcome.

[Chado1]

How are the Cubs +475 and the D-Backs +1000...are you sure that isnt an error cause that wouldnt make sense?

[Chado1]

Im taking the Rockies +305 to get to the WS....that is worth a shot IMO cause that means they just have to make it there and not necessarily win it....

[BillMill71]

How are the Cubs +475 and the D-Backs +1000...are you sure that isnt an error cause that wouldnt make sense?

Why wouldn't that make sense? They feel neither one of them really have a shot at winning the WS, and the Cubs they feel have a better shot?

[Chado1]

Why wouldn't that make sense? They feel neither one of them really have a shot at winning the WS, and the Cubs they feel have a better shot?

The reason I said that is because I thought the D-Backs were favored over the Cubs to win that series...are they not?

[BillMill71]

The reason I said that is because I thought the D-Backs were favored over the Cubs to win that series...are they not?

The Cubs are favorites for the series, to win the NL, and have the best odds of an NL team to win the series