This is why.....

[Three Jack]

Last year the eagles beat the NYG IN NY!

Giants win 6 - 8 games at most, could win just 5. But the fact the Eagles beat NY in NJ last year means nothing. Giants won in Phil! Big deal! I know, I know...the Giants win was because of
A) bad officiating
B) the Eagles lost it, Giants didn't win it.
C) Horrendous play calling
D) All of the above.

[Three Jack]

Remains to be seen buddy. Got the in game experience we needed at QB got a solid RB Glenn,Owens at the wideouts throw in Whitten. Things are lookin good in the Big D.

All except the Head Coach. Wade Phillips cannot excite you...does he?

[BigMike]

Giants win 6 - 8 games at most, could win just 5. But the fact the Eagles beat NY in NJ last year means nothing. Giants won in Phil! Big deal! I know, I know...the Giants win was because of
A) bad officiating
B) the Eagles lost it, Giants didn't win it.
C) Horrendous play calling
D) All of the above.

Eagles won in the playoffs, what else matters. You can list the reasons they won below.......

[wayne1218]

The 2 young WR's in Philly need to step up this year. Are you listening Jason & Hank?

[BigMike]

The 2 young WR's in Philly need to step up this year. Are you listening Jason & Hank?

Do you not think Hank had a decent rookie year? He will be stretching the field this year.

I love Avant, met him last year at training camp. Really nice guy.....

I think the Birds are fine at wide receiver. I would even compare them to the Pats of old.

[wayne1218]

Do you not think Hank had a decent rookie year? He will be stretching the field this year.

I love Avant, met him last year at training camp. Really nice guy.....

I think the Birds are fine at wide receiver. I would even compare them to the Pats of old.

I don't think 22 catches and 2 TD's was anything special Mike. He or Avant need to be the "Man" imo now that Stallworth is gone and 70+ catches would do that!

[kbsooner21]

I think the Birds are fine at wide receiver. I would even compare them to the Pats of old.

I think that's wishful thinking, but only time will tell

[BigMike]

I think that's wishful thinking, but only time will tell

What's wishful thinking about my statement??? Brown and Curtis are out of Branch and Brown's league? The idea is they pass the ball around and don't have a "#1" receiver.

[wayne1218]

Yes Mike but the last time they had a "Go to Guy" (Owens), Donovan was scary good and they went to the SB.

[kbsooner21]

What's wishful thinking about my statement??? Brown and Curtis are out of Branch and Brown's league? The idea is they pass the ball around and don't have a "#1" receiver.

The wishful thinking part is comparing your WR's that haven't proven much to a group of WR's that have won a couple Super Bowl's

[BigMike]

I don't think 22 catches and 2 TD's was anything special Mike. He or Avant need to be the "Man" imo now that Stallworth is gone and 70+ catches would do that!

I didn't know decent equated to special. He had a nice year for a rookie in the west coast offense. Moats still hasn't picked up the offense. He did average 21 yards a catch. Not special though I guess not many are in their first year.

[BigMike]

The wishful thinking part is comparing your WR's that haven't proven much to a group of WR's that have won a couple Super Bowl's

You missed the boat buddy

[kbsooner21]

You missed the boat buddy

You said it not me

[BigMike]

Yes Mike but the last time they had a "Go to Guy" (Owens), Donovan was scary good and they went to the SB.

And they also had a very good defense. The offense is not the problem. Neither has anything to do with the statement I made about the receivers.

[wayne1218]

I didn't know decent equated to special. He had a nice year for a rookie in the west coast offense. Moats still hasn't picked up the offense. He did average 21 yards a catch. Not special though I guess not many are in their first year.

Put it this way, he was no Marques Colston!