Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question to the BC Folks! Hedging?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #1

    Question to the BC Folks! Hedging?

    I am in a quandery over hedging this bet and placing something on Ottawa. Would you hedge or ride it out? If hedged -what amount and style of bet would you choose? Thank You for your time!

    This is what I am working on!
    4/10/2007 9:24 AM Parlay
    Risk 40.00 To Win 201.27
    Baseball - 951 Houston Astros +131 for Game
    Baseball - 959 Cincinnati Reds/Arizona Diamondbacks under 10 -135 for Game
    Hockey - 51 Pittsburgh Penguins +1½ -200 for Game

    Parlay Risk 60.00 To Win 543.17 Baseball - 951 Houston Astros +131 for Game
    Baseball - 959 Cincinnati Reds/Arizona Diamondbacks under 10 -135 for Game
    Hockey - 51 Pittsburgh Penguins +150 for Game

    These are my choices (5 dimes- fantastic -so many options)- Would greatly appreciate your opinion!

    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins +1½ -200 +150 Over 6½ +105 7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators -1½ +170 -170 Under 6½ -125
    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins +1 -119 Over 6 -125
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators -1 -101 Under 6 +105

    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins -1½ +365 Over 7 +158
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators +1½ -460 Under 7 -180
    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins -1 +285
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators +1 -345

    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins +2½ -485
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators -2½ +385

    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins -2½ +875
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators +2½ -1333
    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins +3½ -1175
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators -3½ +755

    Wed 4/11 51 Pittsburgh Penguins -3½ +1630
    7:05PM (EST) 52 Ottawa Senators +3½ -3260
    Last edited by Spearit; 04-11-2007, 09:42 AM.
    "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Hmmmm! I am thinking about the time I waste helping out where I can on this site and now- I ask for some advice and get nothing. Like a simple yes or no would do! Well - on to other forums!
    "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

    Comment

    • #3
      Dude, you've got 10 views, give it a chance.

      NCAA Hoops 14-14-1 -2.35 units NFL 2-1 +1 unit
      NBA 6-7-1 -2.32 units NHL 10-4-1 +3.95 units
      MLB 6-7-1 -2.95u WNBA 1-0 +1u. NCAAF 3-1 +1.5 u

      Comment

      • #4
        What's Ottawa on the ml?

        NCAA Hoops 14-14-1 -2.35 units NFL 2-1 +1 unit
        NBA 6-7-1 -2.32 units NHL 10-4-1 +3.95 units
        MLB 6-7-1 -2.95u WNBA 1-0 +1u. NCAAF 3-1 +1.5 u

        Comment

        • #5
          Just saw this. Most likely I would let it ride.

          I would take either:

          52 Ottawa Senators -1 -101 for 300

          or

          52 Ottawa Senators +1 -345 risking 345 to win 100, this leaves me many ways to win with little risk
          2012 - 2013 NCAAF

          21 - 20 - 0

          2012 - 2013 NFL

          14 - 10 - 1

          Comment

          • #6
            Thanx Dennis and Bill- Don't mean to have an attitude but the view count was double that Dennis and no bites. Dennis -those are my only choices. Bill - Thanx- That is the direction I was heading. Now specifically- it would take me awhile to structure the bet so I win the most I can!
            Last edited by Spearit; 04-11-2007, 10:24 AM.
            "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

            Comment

            • #7
              Tricky because their's two different lines involved.
              ML I'd play Ottawa to win at least 200, you stand to pull back 603 with Pitt winning straight up.
              Puck line there's 242 coming back...hard to lay Otta +1.5 -460. Hell you'd have to risk 184 just to cover the original 40.
              But there you have a chance of a middle, one goal game.
              Me, I'd throw something on the other side, just to insure some profit, it's a marathon, not a sprint.

              NCAA Hoops 14-14-1 -2.35 units NFL 2-1 +1 unit
              NBA 6-7-1 -2.32 units NHL 10-4-1 +3.95 units
              MLB 6-7-1 -2.95u WNBA 1-0 +1u. NCAAF 3-1 +1.5 u

              Comment

              • #8
                Sorry Spearit, was only 10 when I hit the shower, was pondering what I'd do as the soap burned my eyes.
                Good Luck whatever you choose!

                NCAA Hoops 14-14-1 -2.35 units NFL 2-1 +1 unit
                NBA 6-7-1 -2.32 units NHL 10-4-1 +3.95 units
                MLB 6-7-1 -2.95u WNBA 1-0 +1u. NCAAF 3-1 +1.5 u

                Comment

                • #9
                  "ML I'd play Ottawa to win at least 200, you stand to pull back 603 with Pitt winning straight up."

                  Thanx again Dennis!

                  So - -1, ml, or +1 are the choices!
                  Last edited by Spearit; 04-11-2007, 10:29 AM.
                  "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    I found it


                    The ML is -170 on Ottawa
                    "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      I just saw this Spear. Looks like the fellas presented the strongest options to you.
                      Good luck!
                      Remember, one just man causes the Devil greater affliction than a million blind believers

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        I agree Yuri- I am just trying to structure it correctly and realize I haven't done this before in this manner. Thanz Bud.
                        "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          I know a man of your caliber will figure it out
                          Remember, one just man causes the Devil greater affliction than a million blind believers

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            OK - Gawd I can get so impatient at times- Sorry about that!
                            Anyway- I decided on the famous -1 line 202 to win 200
                            where a one point win by Ottawa pays me
                            201.27 and I push on the above bet.
                            A two point and more win pays me 200.
                            A Pitt win pays me 744.44 - 202 = 542.44
                            Can't lose now! Thanks for helping me figure it out!
                            Last edited by Spearit; 04-11-2007, 11:04 AM.
                            "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              I would offer an opinion Spearit, but i have no idea about hockey. Sorry
                              Questions, comments, complaints:
                              [email protected]

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X