Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did I Miss Something???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Did I Miss Something???

    I was watching the end of the Purdue vs NW game and NW is trying to foul at the end to extend the game.

    They successfully commit a reach in in the back court and the Purdue player was awarded 3 free throws.

    The announcer goes on to say that when a foul is committed in the back court with under one minute (he might have said two minutes, not sure) the player is awarded 3 free throws in an effort to cut down all of the fouling at the end of games.

    I have merely one question...

    SINCE FCUKING WHEN???

    I have been watching basketball for a long time and I've never even heard this as a proposal. Is this a Big 10 rule? I've watched no less than 100 Big 10 games this year and have never seen a team awarded 3 FTs in this situation.

    Have I lost my mind or has anyone else ever heard of this rule?
    Last edited by bigjimt; 02-24-2007, 03:29 PM.
    The Rice Truck is NEVER Wrong!!!

  • #2
    I have never heard of this either..............

    Comment


    • #3
      you got me, I didn't know about this myself
      Everybody dies, but not everyone lives.

      Comment


      • #4
        The player was awarded 3 FTs and made only the 3rd.

        If this had effected the spread result I would've needed to be put in a straight jacket for my own safety.
        The Rice Truck is NEVER Wrong!!!

        Comment


        • #5
          That is definitely not an NCAA rule, maybe there was a lane violation on the 1st one?
          O..H.........I..O!

          2010 NCAA Football: 4-3-1

          2010 NFL: 0-0

          2009-2010 NCAA Basketball: 30-23-1

          Comment


          • #6
            Apples is right. That is not a rule.

            Comment


            • #7
              How about B.C. up 5 with :08 left after a Clemson dunk. They put the ball in play and Clemson stands there for 8 ticks and doesn't foul? I lose by a hook cuz a cbb team down only 5 doesn't foul. HUH? WHAT???

              All i need is a foul and one fucken free throw!!!!!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by wayne1218
                How about B.C. up 5 with :08 left after a Clemson dunk. They put the ball in play and Clemson stands there for 8 ticks and doesn't foul? I lose by a hook cuz a cbb team down only 5 doesn't foul. HUH? WHAT???

                All i need is a foul and one fucken free throw!!!!!!

                brutal, just brutal
                Questions, comments, complaints:
                [email protected]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by wayne1218
                  How about B.C. up 5 with :08 left after a Clemson dunk. They put the ball in play and Clemson stands there for 8 ticks and doesn't foul? I lose by a hook cuz a cbb team down only 5 doesn't foul. HUH? WHAT???

                  All i need is a foul and one fucken free throw!!!!!!
                  Had the same damn thing happen with JC's cards a couple weeks ago vs nova I think. Have nova -4.5 and nova has ball up 4 with about 6 secs left. they inbound and pitino doesn't have his team foul WTF??

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm guessing the announcers were mistaken, but when I heard it live at the time I was baffled.

                    As far as the BC/Clemson game...

                    It sure does seem like teams do bizarre things at the end of these games now more than ever.

                    The timeout after a make to just let the team inbound and run out the clock is way up on that list.
                    The Rice Truck is NEVER Wrong!!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      All I heard it was an intentional foul and that is why he was awarded 3 free throws.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Wouldn't an intentional foul be 2 shots and the ball?

                        And thank you Pitt for pissing away what should have at least been an easy cover.
                        The Rice Truck is NEVER Wrong!!!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X