Nice info - Frank - I have a play on zona in a sweetheart tease at +16. I realize you may not be a fan of these- but I have garnered a 65% win ratio utilizing sides and totals. Your thoughts.
"The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.
They may have incentive, but a "must win" to me if "lose the game and your season is over." That was actually the case for SF here. If they lost, they had no postseason chance mathmatically.
I definitely agree that dogs are gonna be hitting here, but I just don't know if the "must win" angle fits here. Anyway, GL!
I understand your points. I was using the term loosely.
How about this:
In week 15 and later play against favorites with between 6 and 9 wins vs losing teams.
what about denver/arizona? arizona covered as adog. getting 2 1/2. is that a fade? denveer in a must win situation. thanks frank for all your hard work. okes
I think Broncos are a great fade the rest of the season.
Thanks for the input, the double input, explaining the input, justifying the input, clarifying the input, re iterating the input, satisfying an explanation to the input, re stating the input, and so on...........
Thanks for the input Frank, I knew what you meant from the instant you typed it in.........
Once again from week 15 and later favorites with between 6 and 9 wins vs a losing team cover a very poor 37.1% of their must win games and 35.5% as a road favorite. They only win SU 61% of the games.
These favorites were 2-8 ATS and 4-6 SU this weekend with Dallas and Miami both a play against tomorrow. Unfortunately, one of the two winners was KC vs Oakland. lol
Comment