manning is a very good QB. he has talent. bottom line. when the chips are down and he is all in he folds up like a cheap suit time and again. that is his M.O.
manning is a very good QB. he has talent. bottom line. when the chips are down and he is all in he folds up like a cheap suit time and again. that is his M.O.
Peyton Manning will go down in writing as the greatest QB the game has ever seen.....he is far from finished........he will shatter every NFL passing record known to man and will win at least 1 Super Bowl
The guy freakin unbelieveable......if all he needs is a title to make all of you say uncle that will be done in due time
As for Brady he is a stud no denying but in terms of talent he cant even hold Mannings strap
These 2 guys IMO are the 2 best qb's in the NFL and have been for a long time. I think Manning is the better QB however. I would like to see how many SUPER BOWLS Brady would have won with INDY"S notoriously bad and weak defense. Also I have to agree with the person who said INDy's line is weak because its true. If Manning had Brady's defense I think he would win the Super Bowl year in and year out he is just that good. As for Brady, if he was on the Colts he would put up nice numbers but would eventually lose in the playoffs to more physical teams like NE (if Brady was a Colt), Denver,Pittsburgh. Also don't discount the facts about the head coaches, Bill Bellichik is a much better coach than Tony Dungy which also gives Brady a huge advantage which you must take into effect. Indy's )-line is the reason they lost to Pitt last year and NE in prior years. Can't blame Manning for those (coaching by Dungy too soft and horrific o-line and soft as vanilla defenses yearly) People numbers don't lie. I know Brady has a 3-0 super bowl advantage but all things considered its like saying Troy Aikman was better than Brett Farve which no way he is or was but just because he won 3 SB's and Farve only won 1 doesn't mean Aikman is better. He just had stronger supporting casts. Defense wins championships and offense sells tickets. Brady has always had physical, STINGY defenses while Mannings defenses always are soft and RANK at the bottom every year.
The coaches control the teams and Belichek is far better than Dungy. If Manning was playing for NE,he would have won a couple of Super Bowls by now, but his stats wouldn't be as impressive.
Also, if Belichek was coaching Indy, they wouldn't have a bad defense. I personally would take Brady, he has performed better under fire.
I Know The Manning Family Very Well, Peyton And Eli Will Both Win A Super Bowl When All Is Said And Done. I Believe In My Heart If Archie Had Been With A Decent Team, He Would Have Had A Chance To Win A Super Bowl. Now Please I'm Not Being Smart About Anything!!!!! Just Expressing My Feelings.
These 2 guys IMO are the 2 best qb's in the NFL and have been for a long time. I think Manning is the better QB however. I would like to see how many SUPER BOWLS Brady would have won with INDY"S notoriously bad and weak defense. Also I have to agree with the person who said INDy's line is weak because its true. If Manning had Brady's defense I think he would win the Super Bowl year in and year out he is just that good. As for Brady, if he was on the Colts he would put up nice numbers but would eventually lose in the playoffs to more physical teams like NE (if Brady was a Colt), Denver,Pittsburgh. Also don't discount the facts about the head coaches, Bill Bellichik is a much better coach than Tony Dungy which also gives Brady a huge advantage which you must take into effect. Indy's )-line is the reason they lost to Pitt last year and NE in prior years. Can't blame Manning for those (coaching by Dungy too soft and horrific o-line and soft as vanilla defenses yearly) People numbers don't lie. I know Brady has a 3-0 super bowl advantage but all things considered its like saying Troy Aikman was better than Brett Farve which no way he is or was but just because he won 3 SB's and Farve only won 1 doesn't mean Aikman is better. He just had stronger supporting casts. Defense wins championships and offense sells tickets. Brady has always had physical, STINGY defenses while Mannings defenses always are soft and RANK at the bottom every year.
The O-Line EXCUSE is VERY WEAK! Read post 10
How many SB's would brady have if he had Edge, Harrison & Wayne? I'm guessing about 5 by now!
I also keep hear it's because belichek is a better coach. You don't think Brady has played a BIG part in making him look like a genius? C'mon guys ... WAKE UP!!!
Manning also calls his own plays at the line of scrimmage. How in the hell is that Dungy's fault in the playoffs when everything Manning called failed against Pittsburgh? They had a great O-Line that brought them to 15-2 before they lost ... Remember?
Peyton makes calls and places blocking right where he wants it and he gets fooled by defenses time after time after time in the Playoffs!
Brady has NEVER had the weapons around him on offense to equal what manning works with.
Weapons in the NFL is overrated. The talent level in the NFL is very close. It's the best of the best. Put Branch, Givens and other Patriot receivers on Indy and they'll also be pro bowlers.
Brady has the best weapons of all. A great offensive line with a great defense.
All that being said. I'd take Brady over P Manning in a heartbeat.
Comment