We have scored 20 runs against N.Y. in 3 games W/OUT him. LMFAO ... Are you saying we lost because we lacked his bat or that it would have mattered??? Oh god .......
So with him...You would have won because there was no way that Beckett would have walked 9 guys with Veritek on the mound, right?
We have scored 20 runs against N.Y. W/OUT him. LMFAO ... Are you saying we lost because we lacked his bat or that it would have mattered??? Oh god .......
I never said that and never will. All I said was that he was hitting .243, which is true.
Josh Beckett walks 9 guys because Varitek isn't back there????
Is Varitek being out one of the many problems, Yes. But this has been a total team collapse.
I will say this, and it has been said before and is obvious:
Varitek would not have LOSERS like Seanez, Taverex, Johnson or Snyder;they sucked with Tek pitching and sucked without him. you aren't going to win a WS with those gus no matter who pitches.
The remainder of the staff other than Schilling, Wakefield(when he is healthy) and Papelbon are questionable and/or very experienced.
Perhaps it could be argued that Varitek held together this very tenuous staff as well as he could(and pretty well) while he was catching every day.
Then when he went down, the problems were no longer masked, the performances got worse simply because Lopez and Mirabelli simply don't have the overall talents of Varitek of calling the game and holding the staff together.
If one accepts this argument, then the real problem lies with front office for burying their hands in the sand and deluding themselves and fans into thinking that Sox pitching was good enough to compete at the highest level.
ps What is very troubling to me (and I don't relate it to Varitek is the apparent demise of Timlin;he has been horrendous of late with game on the line,; if he is all washed up, it would be another crushing blow, as the other pitchers who would be used to replace him are far worse.
LMAO....I know you do...and I must say I'm enjoying it. You are my favorite and worst person to "agrue" with because we're both so passionate about our opinions.
Comment