Originally posted by KazDog
View Post
Just b/c he chose not to enforce the pre nup doesn't invalidate the argument. You mean to tell me IF he wanted to have it enforced, he couldn't b/c she was asking for more? That is pure nonsense. She could have asked for 100 BILLION dollars. Who cares the amount she ASKED for? Irrelvant imo.
HIGHLY doubtful imo, but MAYBE the original pre nup had no confidentiality clause in it. (which you CONVENIENTLY left out of you post after being proven dead pan wrong about the People interview). I wouldn't think something like that would have been left out of the pre nup.
Maybe he was concerned about perception if she had just received the pre nup amount?
I just don't see how anyone who has an inkling of Tiger's competitiveness would fathom the theory that he tanked on purpose b/c of money. Did the attorney give him a dollar amount cap that he should earn?
And if your expert brother was repping Elin, wouldn't he be saying "I don't care what Tiger is shooting now, we are sticking with our figure or going to court"? You would have a better argument that he lost sponsorship money, but I don't think that would even hold up. 33 years old, healthy, can play another 30+ years. Even if his earnings were cut in 1/2 to 60 million a year, that's still a ton of money.
Comment