why the hell are we helping pakistan?

[vitterd]

people can make their own conclusions.

arguing with you is like talking to a wall.

I know it frustrates u that I just don't throw up my hands and say" husker is nuts I'm done with him" like so many others have done. I've seen u then claim some sort of victory. Never gonna happen with me. Gonna continue to dispute your crazed thinking and wrong predictions.

[vitterd]

At least the wall doesn't argue back

Kb I know an excellent doctor who can help you. Just say the word

[ToDaClub]

Kb I know an excellent doctor who can help you. Just say the word

Now that I would argue about! That Dr. does not exist!!!

[vols fan]

I have been singing "You know they call me Dr Feelgood" ever since I read Vits post and now I can't get it out of my head

[vols fan]

Kb I know an excellent doctor who can help you. Just say the word

Lets see if your ability to read people is getting better. What exactly does he need help with IN YOUR OPINION?

[vitterd]

Lets see if your ability to read people is getting better. What exactly does he need help with IN YOUR OPINION?

Paranoid dellusions. Prob brought on by having discussions with fringe members of a certain political party and discussions with people of questionable morals. Don't wanna go too much further. It could drive him to the edge or into drinking too much. Certain members here have already seemed to get to that stage. Kb is getting close

[vols fan]

Paranoid dellusions. Prob brought on by having discussions with fringe members of a certain political party and discussions with people of questionable morals. Don't wanna go too much further. It could drive him to the edge or into drinking too much. Certain members here have already seemed to get to that stage. Kb is getting close

alright KB.Now you tell us if his crystal ball is correct or not

Way to go out on a limb and say KB might drink to much

[vitterd]

alright KB.Now you tell us if his crystal ball is correct or not

Way to go out on a limb and say KB might drink to much

I told u. I'm tryin to be delicate because it looks like he can still be helped. Some here cannot

The guy already told us he couldn't get a a conversation going with all his wall. He is obviously dellusional

[Spark]

Stay on topic

[baseballdave]

Ahhhhh dave. Once again u are lost. I have admitted my judgement against sarah palin is clouded because I have a true dislike for the woman. So in that aspect I'm wrong for making too many judgements on her. Since most of the posts in here are based on ones opinion its hard to call someone wrong. Misguided for sure.

Where I have critized the crazy fringe right is when the facts are wrong or they post spam emails(jman) that pull out certain parts of the story for conservative spin. Other examples of husker being wrong on facts and predictions are littered throughout many websites including this one

U should spend more time actually reading the posts. Since u said for me to point out one time where I was wrong and I did. Guess what that makes you? WRONG

Just want to make sure I read this post correctly, since you, once again, think you are better than everyone, and I just wanted to say I read the whole post.
Since you "admitted that your judgment was clouded" over the palin issue, I guess for you, that is admitting that you are wrong. And if that is the case, then I was wrong because this ONE time you admitted your "judgment was clouded."

But, this quote by you has me confused, so bear with me as I know I am past KB's level already.
"Since most of the posts in here are based on ones opinion its hard to call someone wrong. Misguided for sure"

Does this mean that if you can't call "ones opinions wrong" but "misguided for sure" , that if their opinions aren't the same as yours, then they are "misguided?"
Which basically states that your opinions are right and anyone who has a different opinion is "misguided."

Now I read this word for word what YOU wrote and I want you to tell me how you can twist this to say anything different.

Ahhh vitterd, show me the way and enlighten me oh chosen one. Please help this "misguided" one get on the proper path.

[jcindaville]

everything, you have to take the money/criminal element out of drugs to get any money savings (they would be HUGE!). there will be so much money saved that there could be all kinds of programs for the few that get addicted. how many people are addicted to alcohol, and look at those costs to society. why is alcohol ok, but everything else addicting isn't? you can throw gambling into the addiction thing also. it's always going to be there. legalizing it puts it out in the open, criminalizing it puts it in the shadows.

Sorry, but you cant justify leaglizing meth, coke, heroin Husker, that if freaking insane!

[baseballdave]

Sorry, but you cant justify leaglizing meth, coke, heroin Husker, that if freaking insane!

I agree JC. I personally am against legalizing pot, meth, coke, etc., no matter the money the government would make. I KNOW how easy it is to get addicted to things such as this. I am an alcoholic who has been sober since Feb. of 2006. That is not the acholol distributors fault, but my own.
If pot, coke, heroin, etc., were legalized, it would make it easier for kids to get and make them more apt to take them.

I know people on here will say if they want it, they will get it anyway - which is true. But, by being illegal, there might be one kid who doesn't try it and that makes it worth while, in my opinion.
Some say "Since alcohol is legal, make pot or coke legal." I disagree. If making it illegal saves one man or woman from doing it, that is worth the law making it illegal.

Alcohol being legal didn't make me an alcoholic - me not being able to control myself made me an alcoholic. If making drugs illegal makes it harder to get addicted, so be it, and NO amount of money made by the government makes it worth that risk.
Again, only my opinion.

[Jamaicanman]

I agree JC. I personally am against legalizing pot, meth, coke, etc., no matter the money the government would make. I KNOW how easy it is to get addicted to things such as this. I am an alcoholic who has been sober since Feb. of 2006. That is not the acholol distributors fault, but my own.
If pot, coke, heroin, etc., were legalized, it would make it easier for kids to get and make them more apt to take them.

I know people on here will say if they want it, they will get it anyway - which is true. But, by being illegal, there might be one kid who doesn't try it and that makes it worth while, in my opinion.
Some say "Since alcohol is legal, make pot or coke legal." I disagree. If making it illegal saves one man or woman from doing it, that is worth the law making it illegal.

Alcohol being legal didn't make me an alcoholic - me not being able to control myself made me an alcoholic. If making drugs illegal makes it harder to get addicted, so be it, and NO amount of money made by the government makes it worth that risk.
Again, only my opinion.

I think the fact that they are illegal deters people. If you make it difficult, illicit, and dangerous to get, I am pretty confident that alone has swayed people from getting involved. Making it easier might just induce trying and create more problems then the current ones. You will still have the addiction/treatment problems, just on steroids. Plus what are you going to do, have the FDA regulate what coke is cut with or what can be mixed with meth?

I understand the tax argument, but I don't see the ends justifying the means there. MAYBE pot, and DEFINITELY gambling, but not the above mentioned drugs.

[husker]

no one is talking about the thousands of people killed every year in the US from the crime aspect of drugs. spark, how many are killed just in chicago every year? how many INNOCENT people are killed because of the illegal drug trade? no one has any solution for the drug crime aspect. it will just keep going on and on. legalize it and the criminal element is removed and there is a boat load of money to help addicts who have nothing now. what about all the thefts to support expensive drug habits now.

[Jamaicanman]

no one is talking about the thousands of people killed every year in the US from the crime aspect of drugs. spark, how many are killed just in chicago every year? how many INNOCENT people are killed because of the illegal drug trade? no one has any solution for the drug crime aspect. it will just keep going on and on. legalize it and the criminal element is removed and there is a boat load of money to help addicts who have nothing now. what about all the thefts to support expensive drug habits now.

Isn't most of the crime b/c addicts can't afford their habit? Not b/c it is illegal. Just b/c the gov't is overseeing the sale of a $10 rock vs Billy on the corner doesn't put the $10 in the addicts hands. He is still going to rob or steal to get his money for the drugs.

I agree it would take down some of the violence in the drug "trade", but I don't think it disappears. I also think just b/c you legalize it that doesn't equate to eliminating the illegal sales. You think dealers are going to want to start paying taxes? You think people want their business now known publically by being seen buying crack or meth?

Gee there is my dentist walking into the corner meth shop right before my appt. Hey Doc, what's up!!