He will still be blamed.I voted for him and have tried to take up for him in the past but I think we can all agree he has failed these last couple of years.I agree with you 100% about Congress voting for this war also.I have been calling Bush "El Nino".Remember a couple of years ago any disaster(rain,hurricanes,mud slides,blizzards or tornado)was blamed on El Nino and thats kinda how it seems to go for Bush.Let the Dems get there guy or lady in and everytime they screw up it will be because there fixing Bush's screw ups.You find me a Democrat who has ever been wrong about politics and I will be shocked.You can't argue with them you just have to let them be.Trust me,2 years from now we will see were they all stand.
The same can be said of Republicans!
And the Country is so fucked up it will take more than 2 years to fix this mess that the Governor and his cronies put this Country in.............
We have dumb asses like the Clintons that prefer to ruin their own party than to call it quits when there is no way for them to win..
Why would she quit? Obama won't have enough delegates to win either. The only way either one wins is with the superdelegates. And with this race shit coming out and Obama dropping big in the polls now who would want her to quit?
Simple solution is they both run on the same ticket, however Obama hasn't said anything about being up for this while Clinton has, but of course wants to be President not Vice President.
How many funding bills did they pass? They could have not funded like promised and ended the war.plain and simple.
Come on man.....You're smarter than that. It's not just simple to cut funding and end the war. That's suicide. For our country and theirs. There has to be a very well detailed plan to end this thing, and unfortunately, the president is the ONLY one who can do that. Bush obviously has no desire to do that. It will take the incoming president to do that. Hopefully, whoever it is, will.
Come on man.....You're smarter than that. It's not just simple to cut funding and end the war. That's suicide. For our country and theirs. There has to be a very well detailed plan to end this thing, and unfortunately, the president is the ONLY one who can do that. Bush obviously has no desire to do that. It will take the incoming president to do that. Hopefully, whoever it is, will.
KAZ
You can't talk to him about this as I've tried to before and he continues with the same as before.
Why would she quit? Obama won't have enough delegates to win either. The only way either one wins is with the superdelegates. And with this race shit coming out and Obama dropping big in the polls now who would want her to quit?
Simple solution is they both run on the same ticket, however Obama hasn't said anything about being up for this while Clinton has, but of course wants to be President not Vice President.
No way they run on the same ticket. Neither will take a back seat.
Can Barack tell me what a "typical" white person is please?
And been labeled as helping terrorists by the fear monger of the Governor and his cronies
I'm going to run for congress on an ending the war platform, but if i am called a name, i will abandon my principles and let others die in the war. And wouldn't they get re elected if they did the will of the people? makes a lot of sense. and they had the power to do it and they didn't, so what does that say about them?
Can Barack tell me what a "typical" white person is please?
The funny thing is, the Republican's have fucked this country up so bad, Congress and Bush, that we might actually have an African American or a woman as president. Something I never thought I'd see in my lifetime. What does that tell you about how the Republican's are perceived in the country right now?
KAZ
Actually that tells me a whole lot more about the state of the Democratic party than anything else. Personally, I don't have an issue with an African American or a woman as President but if you do, it's now Bush's fault that the Democrats can't present a qualified candidate? This election should be a slam dunk for the Democrats and the fact that it isn't says more about the state of the Democratic candidates and the vision of the party than anything. The country voted for change when they gave the Democrats control of congress and, guess what, nothing change it has just gotten worse. And it is the Prez fault and it is Congress' fault.
I'm going to run for congress on an ending the war platform, but if i am called a name, i will abandon my principles and let others die in the war. And wouldn't they get re elected if they did the will of the people? makes a lot of sense. and they had the power to do it and they didn't, so what does that say about them?
Actually that tells me a whole lot more about the state of the Democratic party than anything else. Personally, I don't have an issue with an African American or a woman as President but if you do, it's now Bush's fault that the Democrats can't present a qualified candidate? This election should be a slam dunk for the Democrats and the fact that it isn't says more about the state of the Democratic candidates and the vision of the party than anything. The country voted for change when they gave the Democrats control of congress and, guess what, nothing change it has just gotten worse. And it is the Prez fault and it is Congress' fault.
I just wish Michael Bloomberg would have run.
If a man's credibility is falling based on Race what does that tell you?
Comment