IT SEEMS THE STEELERS ARE ALWAYS INVOLVED IN SHADY GAMES - WEIRD ENDINGS - BIZZARE SHIT
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is it just me ???
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Postgoing for 2
the onside kick
qb passing for 500 yrds and they win by a point
favored by 1.5 most of the week and win by one...
Pitts defense sucked, I thought onisde kick was a good choice, before the fact.
Aaron Rodgers threw for 400 yards and 3 TDs and lost by a point.
I've seen much shadier than this.
Oh yeah, the Packers defense should be shot."CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostWhy wouldn't they go for 2?
Pitts defense sucked, I thought onisde kick was a good choice, before the fact.
Aaron Rodgers threw for 400 yards and 3 TDs and lost by a point.
I've seen much shadier than this.
Oh yeah, the Packers defense should be shot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Country 5 View PostIf you thought the onside kick was a good idea,you are severely fucked up in the head.that was one of the most ignorant calls Ive ever seen.And I'm old.
Prior to the kick, the Packers had two possesions, for 140 yards and two TDs in the fourth quarter alone. But, yeah I would have trusted the defense too, that same defense that gave up a GW drive to the RAIDERS two weeks ago....
"CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
prior to the kick, the packers had two possesions, for 140 yards and two tds in the fourth quarter alone. but, yeah i would have trusted the defense too, that same defense that gave up a gw drive to the raiders two weeks ago....
Comment
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Postso give the team u cant stop the ball at the 40 ?
If they did kick it away. In all likelihood the Packers still score, and there's less time left for Pitt.
Bottom line there defense was sieve this whole game."CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
Comment