Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is it just me ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is it just me ???

    IT SEEMS THE STEELERS ARE ALWAYS INVOLVED IN SHADY GAMES - WEIRD ENDINGS - BIZZARE SHIT



  • #2
    Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
    IT SEEMS THE STEELERS ARE ALWAYS INVOLVED IN SHADY GAMES - WEIRD ENDINGS - BIZZARE SHIT


    What was shady?
    "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
      IT SEEMS THE STEELERS ARE ALWAYS INVOLVED IN SHADY GAMES - WEIRD ENDINGS - BIZZARE SHIT



      Yeah, they have a way of pull shit out at the end. This is not a very good team without Troy P.
      NBA is a joke

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
        what was shady?
        going for 2

        the onside kick

        qb passing for 500 yrds and they win by a point

        favored by 1.5 most of the week and win by one...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
          going for 2

          the onside kick

          qb passing for 500 yrds and they win by a point

          favored by 1.5 most of the week and win by one...
          Why wouldn't they go for 2?

          Pitts defense sucked, I thought onisde kick was a good choice, before the fact.

          Aaron Rodgers threw for 400 yards and 3 TDs and lost by a point.

          I've seen much shadier than this.

          Oh yeah, the Packers defense should be shot.
          "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

          Comment


          • #6
            Pittsburgh is the tim donaghy of the NFL


            LOL

            Comment


            • #7
              If you thought the onside kick was a good idea,you are severely fucked up in the head.that was one of the most ignorant calls Ive ever seen.And I'm old.

              Comment


              • #8
                I think the same thing I think alot of money is wagered on the Steelers.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                  Why wouldn't they go for 2?

                  Pitts defense sucked, I thought onisde kick was a good choice, before the fact.

                  Aaron Rodgers threw for 400 yards and 3 TDs and lost by a point.

                  I've seen much shadier than this.

                  Oh yeah, the Packers defense should be shot.
                  Who goes for 2 when you are up 4pts. GB made a shady move there.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Big Country 5 View Post
                    If you thought the onside kick was a good idea,you are severely fucked up in the head.that was one of the most ignorant calls Ive ever seen.And I'm old.

                    Prior to the kick, the Packers had two possesions, for 140 yards and two TDs in the fourth quarter alone.
                    But, yeah I would have trusted the defense too, that same defense that gave up a GW drive to the RAIDERS two weeks ago....

                    "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
                      Who goes for 2 when you are up 4pts. GB made a shady move there.
                      Teams do that often late in the 4th quarter. I would pull up some examples for you just this year, but I have very little energy.
                      "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post

                        prior to the kick, the packers had two possesions, for 140 yards and two tds in the fourth quarter alone.
                        but, yeah i would have trusted the defense too, that same defense that gave up a gw drive to the raiders two weeks ago....

                        so give the team u cant stop the ball at the 40 ?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Lol

                          the final score in that sd/pitt game was 11-10... Today... 37-36

                          hmmmm

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
                            so give the team u cant stop the ball at the 40 ?
                            No, you try and not give them the ball at all.

                            If they did kick it away. In all likelihood the Packers still score, and there's less time left for Pitt.

                            Bottom line there defense was sieve this whole game.
                            "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It sucks man, my friend that is the one that takes plays for the books said everyone bet he had was on GB so he and I put a chunk on PITT and lost, FUCKERS

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X