Originally posted by mavskidd02
View Post
If you don't accept that a premise, then this discussion is pointless.
As stated, I am not defending Ortiz by any means and in fact as stated feel the circumstantial evidence indicates that there is a good chance that he did take steroids.
HOWEVER, in comparison to Clemens, the ACTUAL EVIDENCE is much much stronger at this point(with Clemens obviously) anyways that he did use and lie about them-thats all I am saying!
ps In our society whether it be in a courtroom or in a matter like this, one is assumed to be innocent until PROVEN guilty(or at least until such time that the preponderance of evidence indicates someone is guilty).
Comment