Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does Anybody have an easier path to the BCS Title game than Florida?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by molta02 View Post
    i wouldn't say think, as much as know
    agreed, that's my point.

    Lacking that Conference Title game has KILLED Usc in the BCS Points!

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
      If Usc had that extra game, they probably would have been in!
      Even you don't believe that. Do you really think USC playing an extra game and dismantling Oregon or UCLA every year would make a difference? Come on.

      Also I didn't know USC had the option on whether or not to play a title game. Because until they do, don't blame them for it. That's a joke.
      Last edited by mavskidd02; 08-05-2009, 11:23 PM.
      "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
        Even you don't believe that. Do you really think USC playing an extra game and dismantling Oregon or UCLA every year would make a difference? Come on.

        Also I didn't USC had the option on whether or not to play a title game. Because until they do, don't blame them for it. That's a joke.
        It would have been against a (9-3) Oregon team and your damn right it makes a difference. You beat another ranked team and it makes all the difference in the world to the computers and Usc's final BCS Total.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
          It would have been against a (9-3) Oregon team and your damn right it makes a difference. You beat another ranked team and it makes all the difference in the world to the computers and Usc's final BCS Total.
          Read the second part of my post.
          "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post

            Also I didn't USC had the option on whether or not to play a title game. Because until they do, don't blame them for it. That's a joke.

            Who is blaming Usc???????????

            We are saying it is a disadvantage for them not playing that game.

            Comment


            • #51
              one thing that bcs proponents will say (and im not one of them) is that the entire season is a playoff. usc takes care of business against a mediocre at best oregon st team, and they are in title game.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by molta02 View Post
                one thing that bcs proponents will say (and im not one of them) is that the entire season is a playoff. usc takes care of business against a mediocre at best oregon st team, and they are in title game.
                and Stanford the year before .......

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                  Even you don't believe that. Do you really think USC playing an extra game and dismantling Oregon or UCLA every year would make a difference? Come on.

                  Also I didn't know USC had the option on whether or not to play a title game. Because until they do, don't blame them for it. That's a joke.
                  blame their conference for it.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                    Who is blaming Usc???????????

                    We are saying it is a disadvantage for them not playing that game.
                    The system is blaming USC for not having a title game, and the system decides who gets in. So either give them a title game, or shut up about "conference championships make a difference." Unless you give everyone one, no they don't!
                    "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                      The system is blaming USC for not having a title game, and the system decides who gets in. So either give them a title game, or shut up about "conference championships make a difference." Unless you give everyone one, no they don't!
                      Well we all know the system sucks!

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                        and Stanford the year before .......
                        The last two national champions have lost as favorites on their home field. Go figure why, USC is blackballed and they get a pass, the system is a joke.
                        "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                          The system is blaming USC for not having a title game, and the system decides who gets in. So either give them a title game, or shut up about "conference championships make a difference." Unless you give everyone one, no they don't!
                          tell their fuking conference to add the game! whats the problem: the added revenue?

                          problem is that the conf champ game can help you (just ask big 10) as it can hurt you!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                            The last two national champions have lost as favorites on their home field. Go figure why, USC is blackballed and they get a pass, the system is a joke.
                            Losing at home and losing at home AS 40 POINT FAVORITES is on two different planets and worlds apart!

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                              Losing at home and losing at home AS 40 POINT FAVORITES is on two different planets and worlds apart!
                              Yeah, I'm sure the BCS knows the point spreads.
                              "CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by mavskidd02 View Post
                                Yeah, I'm sure the BCS knows the point spreads.
                                The voters do and whose numbers do you think get entered in that computer mavs?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X