Hell, Pete Carroll would tell you those 2 games cost them 2 trips to a Title game. Right or wrong, what's so hard to understand about that?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does Anybody have an easier path to the BCS Title game than Florida?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostYeah, I'm sure the BCS knows the point spreads.
and losing at home to stanford is much different than losing to a pretty good arkansas in 3OT.
and im not trying to pile on, although not a fan i do like the USC program
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostHell, Pete Carroll would tell you those 2 games cost them 2 trips to a Title game. Right or wrong, what's so hard to understand about that?"CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostUSC loses to Oregon St. AT Oregon St. (-24)
Florida loses to Ole Miss AT FLORIDA (-24)
Go ahead, defend that one Wayne.
usc beat 3 ranked teams.
florida best win neutral site over number 1 alabama.
usc best win home verse ohio st.
Comment
-
They each lost one game, and USC had a damn good non-conf. schedule. They won every game except won, and they one by 30+ ppg. They were not just beating the teams they played, they were embarassing them. They set up a good schedule, they beat all but one good team, and Florida does virtually the same. Now again it comes down to the conferences, and they get punished for playing in an inferior one.
It's just stupid. If you looked at non-conf. schedule and all W-L records, USC is a far better team than anyone else last year. But because they are stuck in the Pac-10 they get little respect. I understand it, just think it's idiotic."CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostThey each lost one game, and USC had a damn good non-conf. schedule. They won every game except won, and they one by 30+ ppg. They were not just beating the teams they played, they were embarassing them. They set up a good schedule, they beat all but one good team, and Florida does virtually the same. Now again it comes down to the conferences, and they get punished for playing in an inferior one.
It's just stupid. If you looked at non-conf. schedule and all W-L records, USC is a far better team than anyone else last year. But because they are stuck in the Pac-10 they get little respect. I understand it, just think it's idiotic.
well if the pac 10 sucks so bad usc shouldn't have trouble running the table in conf
Comment
-
Originally posted by molta02 View Posttell their fuking conference to add the game! whats the problem: the added revenue?
problem is that the conf champ game can help you (just ask big 10) as it can hurt you!O..H.........I..O!
2010 NCAA Football: 4-3-1
2010 NFL: 0-0
2009-2010 NCAA Basketball: 30-23-1
Comment
-
Originally posted by molta02 View Postlast year (not including bcs game) florida beat 5 reams ranked at the time. 3 of which ranked in top 6 in the country by a COMBINED 80 points.
usc beat 3 ranked teams.
florida best win neutral site over number 1 alabama.
usc best win home verse ohio st.
They also didn't get the extra Conference Title game like Florida ... but mavs is having trouble understanding that!
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
They also didn't get the extra Conference Title game like Florida ... but mavs is having trouble understanding that!Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostI didn't know USC had the option on whether or not to play a title game. Because until they do, don't blame them for it. That's a joke.Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostThe system is blaming USC for not having a title game, and the system decides who gets in. So either give them a title game, or shut up about "conference championships make a difference." Unless you give everyone one, no they don't!"CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
Comment