Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I never wanna hear that this shit isnt fixed ever again !!!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Postand there were people in this thread defending this reason for the review !!!!!!!!!!
HahahahahahahahahahMLB (2014): (3-4) -.9 units
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostAP/ESPN
After the game, referee Scott Green said "The officials realized afterward the touchdown should have counted, though it wouldn't have affected the result."
I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD
kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right on
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spark View PostSo then i guess it was not conclusive ...
I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD
kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right onMLB (2014): (3-4) -.9 units
Comment
-
Guys I personally was unaware that this is actually the "7th" tie breaker in sequential order....how can anyone in this thread make that an argument? They had to review for the 7th tiebreaker...OMFG...I just spit up my water...
SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Postand there were people in this thread defending this reason for the review !!!!!!!!!!
Hahahahahahahahahah
A comment was made that it meant nothing to the game than ATS. This is not a true statement
NO ONE said that tie breaking was the reason it was reviewed. Go back to post #24
It actually COULD make a difference.
This is getting out of control.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KazDog View PostThe point is Jack....So much debate for or against, means....NOT CONCLUSIVE and the CALL ON THE FIELD STANDS......TOUCHDOWN!
KAZ
But just because I think it wasn't conclusive enough to overturn, doesn't mean I can't understand why the official would think otherwise.
I think the argument that the TD should stand because the game was over is as lame as the argument that they replayed it for tiebreaker implications. I firmly believe they replayed it because it was close enough to do so and the ref thought it went forward so they overturned it. They applied the rule book the way it is supposed to be interpreted...from what little I know about it.Three Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spark View PostSo then i guess it was not conclusive ...
I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD
kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right on
Fixed? Who really knows i guess but it certainly was one of the weirdest things i ever saw. To me, it was clearly a TD.Last edited by wayne1218; 11-16-2008, 11:06 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Postwhat horseshit !!!!
The guy in the booth could have been taking a shit or getting a hummer from a cheerleader for all we know
could've been doing his job also
conclusive my ass
just your opinion, and it doesn't count....The man in the booth called it due to conclusive evidence...it's his that counts....Oh shit, maybe he was the "FIX"...LMAO
so it was conclusive to the man in the booth... Guess that makes it ok
so it was conclusive to the man in the booth... Guess that makes it ok
It just so happens, thats his job, and he has final say so.....damn right that makes it OK.....
where in the world did you come up with statement.....must've not thought B4 you typed that one....
Damn right it's OK....He determines CONCLUSIVE, and that's it....
who are we to question him......maybe you can make the calls for em via internet next time, as you seem to have a handle on it, and you can stop the FIXING LMAO at that one
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostThe score didn't affect me either way. It is very funny though how it was called a TD on the field and a TD after the game but the TD never counted on the scoreboard. Even while reviewing it, both announcers looked at replays and said "I'm not sure what they are reviewing here because it looks like a TD to me".
Fixed? Who really knows i guess but it certainly was one of the weirdest things i ever saw. To me, it was clearly a TD.
wayne ...right on !
Comment
-
Originally posted by KazDog View PostYou just said you have watched it, 'too many times' in order to form your own 'opinion,' and that one must watch it with an 'open mind,' which to me says.....INCONCLUSIVE in your mind as well.
Sorry, I definitely disagree with you.....It was NOT CONCLUSIVE. Play on the field stands......TOUCHDOWN!!!!
KAZ
I really hate to do this.................but, I agree with you KazNBA is a joke
Comment
Comment