I never wanna hear that this shit isnt fixed ever again !!!!

[molta02]

WHY DO THEY ALL SUCK SO MUCH THEN ??

ARE THEY JUST THAT BAD ? CANT BE ANYTHING ELSE

well, yes, nfl refs are pretty bad.

[weazel079]

and there were people in this thread defending this reason for the review !!!!!!!!!!



Hahahahahahahahahah

Do people really believe the tiebreaker was on the refs mind when reviewing this one? This play could have easily never been reviewed to begin with.

[Spark]

AP/ESPN

After the game, referee Scott Green said "The officials realized afterward the touchdown should have counted, though it wouldn't have affected the result."

So then i guess it was not conclusive ...


I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD

kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right on

[molta02]

i'll say this- if the nfl is soooooooooo worried about getting the call right for tie-breaker purposes (LOFL), why don't they fix it since they've already admitted its the wrong call.

[weazel079]

So then i guess it was not conclusive ...


I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD

kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right on

I agree. How the hell is that one overturned.

[Chado1]

Guys I personally was unaware that this is actually the "7th" tie breaker in sequential order....how can anyone in this thread make that an argument? They had to review for the 7th tiebreaker...OMFG...I just spit up my water...

[Guns]

and there were people in this thread defending this reason for the review !!!!!!!!!!



Hahahahahahahahahah

Look man, thats not the way it went down.

A comment was made that it meant nothing to the game than ATS. This is not a true statement

NO ONE said that tie breaking was the reason it was reviewed. Go back to post #24

It actually COULD make a difference.

This is getting out of control.

[Three Jack]

The point is Jack....So much debate for or against, means....NOT CONCLUSIVE and the CALL ON THE FIELD STANDS......TOUCHDOWN!

KAZ

Kaz, if I was in the booth, I would not have buzzed down to have it replayed. Do I think it was conclusive, no. If you asked me to make a decsion if it went forward or backward, one way or the other, I would say forward.

But just because I think it wasn't conclusive enough to overturn, doesn't mean I can't understand why the official would think otherwise.

I think the argument that the TD should stand because the game was over is as lame as the argument that they replayed it for tiebreaker implications. I firmly believe they replayed it because it was close enough to do so and the ref thought it went forward so they overturned it. They applied the rule book the way it is supposed to be interpreted...from what little I know about it.

[LVJimmy]

Bottom line:

NFL REFEREEING IS A F'ING JOKE

WITH OR WITHOUT FIXING GAMES, IT IS AWFUL

[DAREALDEAL]

Kapt and a few others saw conclusive evidence

[wayne1218]

So then i guess it was not conclusive ...


I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD

kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right on

The score didn't affect me either way. It is very funny though how it was called a TD on the field and a TD after the game but the TD never counted on the scoreboard. Even while reviewing it, both announcers looked at replays and said "I'm not sure what they are reviewing here because it looks like a TD to me".

Fixed? Who really knows i guess but it certainly was one of the weirdest things i ever saw. To me, it was clearly a TD.

[Kaptain]

what horseshit !!!!

The guy in the booth could have been taking a shit or getting a hummer from a cheerleader for all we know
could've been doing his job also

conclusive my ass
just your opinion, and it doesn't count....The man in the booth called it due to conclusive evidence...it's his that counts....Oh shit, maybe he was the "FIX"...LMAO

so it was conclusive to the man in the booth... Guess that makes it ok

well well Mr Greek....another brilliant statement from you....

so it was conclusive to the man in the booth... Guess that makes it ok

It just so happens, thats his job, and he has final say so.....damn right that makes it OK.....

where in the world did you come up with statement.....must've not thought B4 you typed that one....

Damn right it's OK....He determines CONCLUSIVE, and that's it....

who are we to question him......maybe you can make the calls for em via internet next time, as you seem to have a handle on it, and you can stop the FIXING LMAO at that one

[molta02]

Bottom line:

NFL REFEREEING IS A F'ING JOKE

WITH OR WITHOUT FIXING GAMES, IT IS AWFUL

it is a joke and always has been.

IMO- i dont think the game was fixed, the officiating is JUST THAT F'N BAD and this is another example.

[beerball101]

The score didn't affect me either way. It is very funny though how it was called a TD on the field and a TD after the game but the TD never counted on the scoreboard. Even while reviewing it, both announcers looked at replays and said "I'm not sure what they are reviewing here because it looks like a TD to me".

Fixed? Who really knows i guess but it certainly was one of the weirdest things i ever saw. To me, it was clearly a TD.

wayne ...right on !

[flarendep1]

You just said you have watched it, 'too many times' in order to form your own 'opinion,' and that one must watch it with an 'open mind,' which to me says.....INCONCLUSIVE in your mind as well.

Sorry, I definitely disagree with you.....It was NOT CONCLUSIVE. Play on the field stands......TOUCHDOWN!!!!

KAZ

I really hate to do this.................but, I agree with you Kaz