Originally posted by wayne1218
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I never wanna hear that this shit isnt fixed ever again !!!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by KazDog View PostAgreed! Chad, you get a lot of shit, but then when you make comments like this, you shouldn't be surprised when someone takes you to the woodshed. I think you made a very poor judgment with those remarks.....
KAZThree Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910
Comment
-
You guys that think the play was reviewed for the 7th Tie Breaker are kidding yourselfs. I have countless plays on my mind where plays should be reviewed and they weren't. Why review this one? And remember the ruling on the field was a TD. I didn't see great enough evidence to overturn the play to begin with. I have seen many occurrences over the last few seasons where the replay clearly shows the play should be overturned and it isn't. Best example is the Oregon vs Oklahoma game a few years back in college football. There are corrupt referees. Do really think Donahee is the only one? He was the scapegoat to make people think otherwise.Last edited by weazel079; 11-16-2008, 10:58 PM.MLB (2014): (3-4) -.9 units
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostAP/ESPN
After the game, referee Scott Green said "The officials realized afterward the touchdown should have counted, though it wouldn't have affected the result."
that equals FIX!!!!
the ruling on the field was such .....A TOUCHDOWN
it didnt affect the outcome of the game and it was a judgement call so why even review it in the first place??? only reason for review is because of the point spread someone is on the take.2013 NCAA POD Record
8-3ATS +3.80 units
2013 NFL POD Record
1-2 ATS -4.50 units
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostAP/ESPN
After the game, referee Scott Green said "The officials realized afterward the touchdown should have counted, though it wouldn't have affected the result."
then why didnt they count it and end the game? there has to be conclusive evidence to change it and they went on no evidence.....DAMAGE control for the NFL and it looks like we have a few here that are doing PR for them
Comment
-
Spark
Originally posted by Spark View PostWOW!!! No need for those comments Chad .... I do not get you sometimes
then he makes another of his famous not knowing statements....such as.....why bother review or care about the score....
Chado being as knowledgable as usually is, doesn't realize that in the event of 2 teams being tied for Playoff positions, final scores, can become a deciding factor.....
Refs did their job as supposed to....some of these knowledgable fans don't realize that....
He refers to Fran, 3 Jack, and myself as his haters, so he comes unglued hen we differ with others and especially him....
He's in the dark once again, not realizing the score can affect playoffs....and his style of reply, nothing new there....cause he gets away with.....
He'll get more attention to it, as he's getting attention from you and me now, and there'll be more
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View PostI has san diego and the under ...and I thought that was a bullshit call !!
BETTER TO BE LUCKY , THAN GOOD !
but yea that was a weird play, dont think the refs, expected that!.....fix & play = no ......fix = call....that was a td!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kaptain View PostIt was conclusive enough for the man in the review booth (he's the one that counts)....I have watched this replay too many times, and if you look at it open mindendly, you'll see there is a yard difference in where the ball left his hand, and traveled forward, bewfore being touched again....
I'm not on the field, and neither are you.....you said the key word CONCLUSIVE....that's what it takes to overturn a call or non call on the field....and he did....so therefore, the man in the Botth had CONCLUSIVE evidence of forward lateral...
sorry you didn't....you answered your own question/opinion....
Takes CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE....well he must have found it on his replay, as I see it on mine...
Sorry, I definitely disagree with you.....It was NOT CONCLUSIVE. Play on the field stands......TOUCHDOWN!!!!
KAZ
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaptain View PostDimer---are you now saying the refs made up the rule, tie breaker etc, all at the end of the game....
Get real Dimer....these rules, as I stated earlier, are given to each Owner, Each Coach, and generally gone over with each player....
Refs have to attend schools, learn rules, take tests, and be aware of all new rule changes.....
PRE existing rule, tie breakers, all B4 the season started....
Got anything else....that one doesn't fly.....
Go ahead and believe that one play, yeh that one play, was premeditated by the FIX Doctors, on National TV, when in reality if it was fixed, they would have been making lil subtle damaging calls against one team or the other all day....
I'm sure the books paid em a ton of money to have SD cover that spread on the last play as planned...
Give me a break dimer
WHY DO THEY ALL SUCK SO MUCH THEN ??
ARE THEY JUST THAT BAD ? CANT BE ANYTHING ELSE
Comment
-
Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View PostSo all this talk about tie breakers and bullshit and point differential is the 7th thing they go to ????
Lmmfao !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah..... They reviewed it for any possible playoff implications and tie breakers
hahahahahahahahahahaha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS NEEDS TO BE POSTED AGAIN
Comment
Comment