Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seattle Bank Hit by ‘Severe’ Loan Losses is 82nd Failure

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Seattle Bank Hit by ‘Severe’ Loan Losses is 82nd Failure

    A Seattle bank hobbled by faltering commercial real estate loans became the 82nd U.S. bank failure this year, costing the insurance fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. more than $158 million.
    The deposits of Washington First International were assumed by East West Bank, of Pasadena, California.
    As of March 31, 2010, Washington First had about $520.9 million in total assets and $441.4 million in total deposits. East West Bank will pay the FDIC a premium of 0.5 percent to assume all of the deposits of Washington First.
    Washington state regulators described the bank’s troubles as indicative of a troubling trend with hundreds of community banks that carry inadequate capital and are hit with severe loan losses.
    “Washington First International Bank’s capital has been depleted by large loan losses associated with land development and construction lending,” Brad Williamson, a director with the state’s Department of Financial Institutions. “The bank’s management unsuccessfully attempted to raise capital and recent loan losses depleted the bank’s capital, bringing about today’s closure.”
    The number of insured banks on the FDIC’s “Problem List” jumped from 702 to 775 during the first quarter, with their total assets increasing from $403 billion to $431 billion.
    The number of bank failures is expected to peak this year, and surpass last year’s total of 140. That was the highest number of bank closures in nearly two decades.

    Seattle Bank Hit by ?Severe? Loan Losses is 82nd Failure | ecreditdaily.com

  • #2
    Unfortunately there are many more to come.

    I can email you a couple of websites that list the 760 banks that are in serious trouble. These banks have already been issued "cease and desist" or consent orders and are being monitored closely

    Another lists the banks with Texas Ratios over 1%. Texas Ratio is a formula used to determine the probability of a bank failure. Anything over .50 is considered a high risk for failure. Currently 367 banks have a Texas Ratio of 1% or higher (almost certain to fail or be forced to sell), and 684 banks with TR's of .50 or greater (high probability of failure).

    Pretty interesting stuff. You may be surprised at the list.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by robby_morini View Post
      Unfortunately there are many more to come.

      I can email you a couple of websites that list the 760 banks that are in serious trouble. These banks have already been issued "cease and desist" or consent orders and are being monitored closely

      Another lists the banks with Texas Ratios over 1%. Texas Ratio is a formula used to determine the probability of a bank failure. Anything over .50 is considered a high risk for failure. Currently 367 banks have a Texas Ratio of 1% or higher (almost certain to fail or be forced to sell), and 684 banks with TR's of .50 or greater (high probability of failure).

      Pretty interesting stuff. You may be surprised at the list.
      Yeah, either e-mail it to me or post it in here.
      [email protected]

      Comment


      • #4
        robby, pls post em here


        Thanks

        Comment


        • #5
          Calculated Risk

          You will have to scroll down to the archive section on the right hand column and click June. They post articles every day so you will have to go to the June 13 date. It will say unofficial problem bank list. Click on it and it will bring you to the table. You can left click on the state section to alphabetize and find your state. This site has some great info.


          Texas Ratio web site:

          Texas Ratio

          Lots of banks on this list, and they are in serious trouble. Tougher to find your state, but it may be worth a look. Look at the 1st quarter 2010 numbers. Anything over 100 is probably done. Some of these banks have TR's in the thousands. Spark, one in Chicago and one in Naperville IL are way up there. Hope its not your bank

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by robby_morini View Post
            Calculated Risk

            Spark, one in Chicago and one in Naperville IL are way up there. Hope its not your bank
            No, but I was with Wheatland Bank years ago ...

            Thanks robbi for this info ...

            Comment


            • #7
              CRimages: Unofficial Problem Bank List June 11, 2010

              Comment


              • #8
                A lot of community banks on this list. They can't take the losses the bigger banks can, and they are the only ones that will lend to small businesses.

                Thats one of the reasons why I think this is a lot longer term problem than most "experts" will say.

                The FDIC has become a broker. They are brokering buyouts between bigger banks and smaller community banks.

                For the most part, big banks won't even talk to small business. Soon there will only be big banks and credit unions.

                Hate to be so doom and gloom, but unfortunately that is the reality.

                Comment

                Working...
                X