Wed Aug 10
2-team +205 Brewers pk and Giants +1.5
gl,
dave
http://pro-edge.tripod.com
Think Hitting nearly 65% with OVER 80 plays in the NFL is a fluke? Think again!
My All New NFL PRO EDGE POWER 7 Excel Program did just that.
In addition, I am currently running the 2003 NFL statistics through the Program. After 4 Weeks of Picks it is currently 23-12 ATS for 65.7%.
Last Season's 2004 NFL Numbers went 53-29* ATS when plugged in to my All-New PRO EDGE POWER 7 Excel Program.
Those are the raw numbers. At 64.6% ATS WINNERS it's pretty strong. All the more when considering a prolific 82 picks.
Some categories, such as non-division games, did even better. But I want to key in on the raw numbers to get a fair and accurate guage.
I am currently in the process of running numbers from the 2003 NFL Season through my PRO EDGE Excel Program. For a game-by-game account of those picks, check out the site:
http://pro-edge.tripod.com
After 4 weeks of picks, the 2003 results are comparable to last year's results at 23-12 ATS for 65.7% WINNERS Against the Pointspread.
*The 53-29 ATS record for 2004 reflects the change of a one-game mistake. I have been promoting publicly a 52-30 ATS record.
The mistake was found when double checking all my stuff and realized I had incorrectly counted the TEXANS +3' over the Vikings. The correct play is Minnesota -3'.
Interested in receiving My PRO EDGE Excel Picks this Season. Hey...it's just a Tipsheet at a tipsheet price.
More info: http://pro-edge.tripod.com
CONTACT: [email protected]
2-team +205 Brewers pk and Giants +1.5
gl,
dave
http://pro-edge.tripod.com
Think Hitting nearly 65% with OVER 80 plays in the NFL is a fluke? Think again!
My All New NFL PRO EDGE POWER 7 Excel Program did just that.
In addition, I am currently running the 2003 NFL statistics through the Program. After 4 Weeks of Picks it is currently 23-12 ATS for 65.7%.
Last Season's 2004 NFL Numbers went 53-29* ATS when plugged in to my All-New PRO EDGE POWER 7 Excel Program.
Those are the raw numbers. At 64.6% ATS WINNERS it's pretty strong. All the more when considering a prolific 82 picks.
Some categories, such as non-division games, did even better. But I want to key in on the raw numbers to get a fair and accurate guage.
I am currently in the process of running numbers from the 2003 NFL Season through my PRO EDGE Excel Program. For a game-by-game account of those picks, check out the site:
http://pro-edge.tripod.com
After 4 weeks of picks, the 2003 results are comparable to last year's results at 23-12 ATS for 65.7% WINNERS Against the Pointspread.
*The 53-29 ATS record for 2004 reflects the change of a one-game mistake. I have been promoting publicly a 52-30 ATS record.
The mistake was found when double checking all my stuff and realized I had incorrectly counted the TEXANS +3' over the Vikings. The correct play is Minnesota -3'.
Interested in receiving My PRO EDGE Excel Picks this Season. Hey...it's just a Tipsheet at a tipsheet price.
More info: http://pro-edge.tripod.com
CONTACT: [email protected]
Comment