Tweet
While many services use absurd ratings (500,000*, lock of the decade, etc.) most of the supposedly mainstream services shy away from that stuff. I personally like sewrvices that actually post their ratings in a betting increment and keep track of their records that way (counting up the strs won and stars lost). In other words, a 3* play could be a $30 or $300 or $3000 bet and a 5* would be $50 or $500 or $5000.
Marc Lawrence's posting yesterday of a "Game of a Lifetime" proves he's just an unethical hack, in my opinion. His clients who took his rating seriously placed their biggest bet ever. We only have one lifetime after all. He may have wiped a few of his unsuspecting dupes out. There a lot of scammers out there. Some can actually handicap while using unethical methodfs while others can't a pick winners at all and survive on the sales methods. Lawrence evidently fits in the latter. Besides, picking game of a lifetime in a matchup between two fine teams and then laying points in such a high profile game is moronic. At least the people Lawrence burned now know he's a hack.
Marc Lawrence's posting yesterday of a "Game of a Lifetime" proves he's just an unethical hack, in my opinion. His clients who took his rating seriously placed their biggest bet ever. We only have one lifetime after all. He may have wiped a few of his unsuspecting dupes out. There a lot of scammers out there. Some can actually handicap while using unethical methodfs while others can't a pick winners at all and survive on the sales methods. Lawrence evidently fits in the latter. Besides, picking game of a lifetime in a matchup between two fine teams and then laying points in such a high profile game is moronic. At least the people Lawrence burned now know he's a hack.
Comment