Tweet
As I would expect from an intelligent and informed group, I've received a number of inquiries regarding the phenomenal results of my newly developed formulas. The question seems to be, is it the real deal?
As you might remember, this time last year I posted the same kinds of numbers from my (then) latest and newest research at various forums. At that time I received the same kind of questions from inquisitive minds--smartly skeptical and rightly so.
Of course, the games of those 4 new formulas from last year (versus virgin data) were posted in the Spread Report Online and the winning results are now history.
From my NFL Yardage Formula which followed up an incredible 48-18 ATS year (2001) with a healthy 38-23 ATS season, to my NCAA College ASR's (average spread ratings) who's popularity with subscribers was matched by a profitable 30-17 record against the spread, the pre-season hype regarding the formulas held enough water to satisfy.
For more info regarding those 4 formulas, feel free to check out my other thread (or my site) for those winning results. But right now I want to stick to the subject and answer the question:
"Hey Dave, is it the Real Deal?"
One thing I have strived to maintain--successfully I might add--is a clean reputation. The industry obviously has a stigma attached, but there are some good ones out there too.
(Feel free to check out the link at my site entitled "About Me" for a brief history of my background.)
The claims I make regarding my Six All-New NFL Formulas & Systems are accurate. In a bit of irony, my Formulas outperformed my actual picks last season. And that's okay with me...
Because the future of the Spread Report Online is the unique, original Formulas that I personally started developing a few years ago.
Anyone who's followed my stuff since the mid-80s' (marketed nationally and in Canada) and most recently my postings at various forums (since 1998) is accustomed to my unique thought processes, my credibility, and my demand that my stuff MAKES SENSE.
The difference between what I've always done (regarding capping the games) and what I am currently doing is that a couple of years ago I began taking my subjective, unorthodox, "human factor" style of Handicapping and applying those thought processes to (and blending them with) statistics.
And as you can see by my posts, the results are pretty eye-opening. Do I expect the formulas to repeat the same numbers this year?
What I expect is that due to each formula's foundation of logical reasoning (cause and effect rationale) they will counter-balance each other and compliment each other ultimately for a winning season--like last year. And last year is the perfect example...
While the NFL Turnover System was only 64-60 ATS last season, it was counter balanced by the continued success of the Real Number Line and the Yardage System.
(As a side note, I fully expect the Turnover System to rebound this year. It's really strong (55-19 ATS in 2001) and makes sense. In addition, this year it will be aided by my newly-developed Turnover Super-System. We'll see.)
I figure this season the be similar to last season:
Some of the Formulas will hold par while others will have an "off Year". But that's just it. That's the beauty of developing stuff that makes sense and has a sound groundwork of logic:
An "off year" for such a formula/system is merely a "break-even" year or minimal losing year because the logical foundation keeps it afloat.
Meanwhile, the profits are coming in on the remaining formulas that are having average winning years or even blockbuster years (like some of them had in each of the last two years).
So that's the gist of it. Right now I"m running 1/2 off during the month of July. Twenty-one Issues from Week One through the Superbowl. Plus 5 Free Pre-Season Issues.
So feel free to stop by for a cup o' Jo, browse around, and get familiar with what FootballFormulas.com is all about...
dave
http://www.FootballFormulas.com
Contact Dave: [email protected]
As you might remember, this time last year I posted the same kinds of numbers from my (then) latest and newest research at various forums. At that time I received the same kind of questions from inquisitive minds--smartly skeptical and rightly so.
Of course, the games of those 4 new formulas from last year (versus virgin data) were posted in the Spread Report Online and the winning results are now history.
From my NFL Yardage Formula which followed up an incredible 48-18 ATS year (2001) with a healthy 38-23 ATS season, to my NCAA College ASR's (average spread ratings) who's popularity with subscribers was matched by a profitable 30-17 record against the spread, the pre-season hype regarding the formulas held enough water to satisfy.
For more info regarding those 4 formulas, feel free to check out my other thread (or my site) for those winning results. But right now I want to stick to the subject and answer the question:
"Hey Dave, is it the Real Deal?"
One thing I have strived to maintain--successfully I might add--is a clean reputation. The industry obviously has a stigma attached, but there are some good ones out there too.
(Feel free to check out the link at my site entitled "About Me" for a brief history of my background.)
The claims I make regarding my Six All-New NFL Formulas & Systems are accurate. In a bit of irony, my Formulas outperformed my actual picks last season. And that's okay with me...
Because the future of the Spread Report Online is the unique, original Formulas that I personally started developing a few years ago.
Anyone who's followed my stuff since the mid-80s' (marketed nationally and in Canada) and most recently my postings at various forums (since 1998) is accustomed to my unique thought processes, my credibility, and my demand that my stuff MAKES SENSE.
The difference between what I've always done (regarding capping the games) and what I am currently doing is that a couple of years ago I began taking my subjective, unorthodox, "human factor" style of Handicapping and applying those thought processes to (and blending them with) statistics.
And as you can see by my posts, the results are pretty eye-opening. Do I expect the formulas to repeat the same numbers this year?
What I expect is that due to each formula's foundation of logical reasoning (cause and effect rationale) they will counter-balance each other and compliment each other ultimately for a winning season--like last year. And last year is the perfect example...
While the NFL Turnover System was only 64-60 ATS last season, it was counter balanced by the continued success of the Real Number Line and the Yardage System.
(As a side note, I fully expect the Turnover System to rebound this year. It's really strong (55-19 ATS in 2001) and makes sense. In addition, this year it will be aided by my newly-developed Turnover Super-System. We'll see.)
I figure this season the be similar to last season:
Some of the Formulas will hold par while others will have an "off Year". But that's just it. That's the beauty of developing stuff that makes sense and has a sound groundwork of logic:
An "off year" for such a formula/system is merely a "break-even" year or minimal losing year because the logical foundation keeps it afloat.
Meanwhile, the profits are coming in on the remaining formulas that are having average winning years or even blockbuster years (like some of them had in each of the last two years).
So that's the gist of it. Right now I"m running 1/2 off during the month of July. Twenty-one Issues from Week One through the Superbowl. Plus 5 Free Pre-Season Issues.
So feel free to stop by for a cup o' Jo, browse around, and get familiar with what FootballFormulas.com is all about...
dave http://www.FootballFormulas.com
Contact Dave: [email protected]
Comment