I live in the country, not far out of town, surrounded by fields. When I moved into my house almost a dozen years ago, I was informed that the 50 acre lot behind and to the side of me was for sale (and had been for a few years) for commercial development. We knew at the time that at some point in the future, someone would come along and buy it and they would need our property as well. Well, our neighbor stopped by the other day and told us that he was on the verge of signing papers to sell it and that the developer would be coming to talk to us as well. It sounds like they're buying about 100 acres to put in high density housing. The road needs to be moved, and they plan to donate my property to the city/county for that. As much as I hate to see my house torn down after all the work I've put into it and my property over the years, I've known it was coming and I think I'm okay with it.
My question is, though, how does the fact that they need my property change the value? We have no desire to move and were just starting to look for an architect to help design an addition I was going to build on next year. We've made good headway on our mortgage and I'm not excited about starting that over. My kids would likely have to change schools. There are rarely any rural homes available where I live, so we will likely end up losing our rural lifestyle and be forced to move into a neighborhood. I don't feel like it would be out of line to expect a premium for the disruption it causes to our lives, but is this reasonable?
My question is, though, how does the fact that they need my property change the value? We have no desire to move and were just starting to look for an architect to help design an addition I was going to build on next year. We've made good headway on our mortgage and I'm not excited about starting that over. My kids would likely have to change schools. There are rarely any rural homes available where I live, so we will likely end up losing our rural lifestyle and be forced to move into a neighborhood. I don't feel like it would be out of line to expect a premium for the disruption it causes to our lives, but is this reasonable?
Comment