Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EU Commission: U.S. Internet gambling laws hamper trade

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EU Commission: U.S. Internet gambling laws hamper trade

    Commission seeks negotiated solution with U.S.

    Source: Reuters, Reporting by Foo Yun Chee and Dale Hudson in Brussels and Doug Palmer and Patrick Rucker in Washington, Thu Mar 26, 2009

    BRUSSELS - A U.S. Justice Department crackdown on European online gambling companies violates U.S. commitments under the World Trade Organization, the European Commission said on Thursday in a draft report.

    But the European Union executive, which oversees trade policy for the 27-nation bloc, said it would seek a negotiated solution with the United States rather than file a groundbreaking complaint at the WTO.

    A senior Democratic lawmaker in the House of Representatives welcomed the EU finding and said he planned to introduce legislation after the April 6-17 congressional break to overturn the U.S. ban on Internet gambling.

    "I'm struck by the people who think we have to abide absolutely and religiously by the WTO ... but when it comes to banning gambling and the WTO, they ignore it," House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said.

    European online gambling firms lost billions of euros in market value after Congress passed legislation in 2006 making it illegal for banks and credit card companies to make payments to online gambling sites.

    Republicans still controlled both the White House and Congress when the U.S. passed the law. Now, Democrats control those two branches of government, but it's unclear how hard the administration of President Barack Obama would push to make online gambling legal in the United States.

    While European companies like PartyGaming (PRTY.L) and 888.com (888.L) subsequently withdrew from the United States, they still face possible U.S. criminal prosecution for their activities in the U.S. market prior to 2006.

    "The report finds that U.S. laws on remote gambling and their enforcement against EU companies constitute a barrier to market access on EU economic interests," the EU said in a summary.

    "Furthermore, EU companies are discriminated against: U.S. companies are allowed to freely operate online gambling on horse racing in the U.S., while European companies and individuals cannot and even face legal action," the EU said.

    By formally accusing the U.S. Justice Department of acting in way that violates U.S. trade commitments, the EU has opened a new chapter in the long-running dispute, said Nao Matsukata, a lawyer with Alston and Bird.

    The Justice Department and the U.S. Trade Representative's office said both agencies would review the report and discuss it with the EU.

    EU Trade Commissioner Ashton said she hoped the two sides could quickly resolve the issue through negotiation.

    "It is for the U.S. to decide how best to regulate Internet gambling in its market, but this must be done in a way that fully respects WTO obligations," Ashton said in a statement.

  • #2
    European Commission Investigation Finds U.S. Laws on Internet Gambling Violate Trade

    Source: Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative

    U.S. regulation of Internet gambling would resolve trade dispute

    (Washington, D.C. – March 27, 2009) As part of a formal investigation, the European Commission has issued a preliminary report that finds U.S. laws on Internet gambling are legally not justified and discriminatory. The report found that the treatment of foreign Internet gambling operators by the U.S. under existing domestic law constituted a barrier to market access for European companies and is inconsistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. Legislation previously introduced by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) would resolve the trade dispute by regulating Internet gambling and creating a level playing field among domestic and foreign Internet gambling operators.

    “The European Commission investigation further highlights the need for the Obama Administration and Congress to regulate Internet gambling not only to protect consumers, but in order to restore integrity to the international trade system,” said Jeffrey Sandman, spokesperson for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative. “The Obama Administration should seek to forge a new direction on Internet gambling, rather than keeping in place a protectionist trade policy that hypocritically discriminates against foreign online gambling operators.”

    E.U. Trade Commissioner Catherine Ashton released a statement that encourages the U.S. to regulate Internet gambling as a way to address this issue. “It is for the US to decide how best to regulate Internet gambling in its market, but this must be done in a way that fully respects WTO obligations. I am hopeful that we can find a swift, negotiated solution to this issue," said Commissioner Ashton.

    Rt Hon. David Blunkett MP, former U.K. Home Secretary and current Member of the U.K. Parliament joined in calling for U.S. regulation, saying, "I fully support the call by the EU Trade Commissioner, Cathy Ashton, for urgent U.S. action to regularise the trade relationship, respect WTO rules and to regulate online gambling. This would provide not only fair competition, but protection for individuals and families, and a legal basis on which substantial revenue could be raised at a time of considerable pressure on public finances."

    The investigation by the European Commission is the result of a Trade Barrier Regulation complaint filed by the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), which represents the largest remote gambling companies in Europe. In its complaint the RGA claims the United States violates international trade law by threatening and pursuing criminal prosecutions, forfeitures and other enforcement actions against foreign Internet gambling operators, while allowing domestic U.S. online gambling operators, primarily horse betting, to flourish.

    At the conclusion of the investigation, the European Commission could pursue discussions with the U.S. to find an appropriate solution to end the discrimination. If the parties cannot settle the matter themselves, the Commission could bring a case against the U.S. to the WTO.

    A recent analysis found that the U.S. could receive as much as $51.9 billion in federal revenue over the next decade if Internet gambling is regulated as proposed in legislation previously introduced by Representatives Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Jim McDermott (D-Wash.).

    About Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative

    The Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative promotes the freedom of individuals to gamble online with the proper safeguards to protect consumers and ensure the integrity of financial transactions. For more information on the Initiative, please visit Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative. The Web site provides a means by which individuals can register support for regulated Internet gambling with their elected representatives.

    Comment


    • #3
      EU Concludes Investigation of US Internet Gambling Law

      WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The European Commission has finalized its draft report following an investigation into United States measures affecting foreign suppliers of Internet gambling services. The investigation has found that US laws on remote gambling and their enforcement against EU companies constitute an obstacle to trade that is inconsistent with WTO rules. Although the provisional conclusions of the report imply that WTO proceedings against US measures would be justified, the report also indicates that the issue should be taken up with the US Administration, with a view to finding a negotiated solution. The report, completed in the framework of the EU Trade Barriers Regulation (TBR), will now be sent to EU member states for comments on the findings, and will be made public once finalized.

      EU Trade Commissioner Catherine Ashton said: "It is for the US to decide how best to regulate Internet gambling in its market, but this must be done in a way that fully respects WTO obligations. I am hopeful that we can find a swift, negotiated solution to this issue."

      The report released today to Member States is the result of a formal examination procedure initiated on 11 March 2008, following a complaint lodged by the Remote Gambling Association (RGA). The report concludes that US laws deny access and discriminate against foreign suppliers of gambling and betting services inconsistently with US WTO obligations.

      European companies are still now subject to legal proceedings by US authorities based on their past activities on the US online gambling and betting market. The proceedings are continuing despite the withdrawal of European companies from the US market in 2006 following changes in the US regulatory framework. The report comes to the conclusion that these proceedings are legally not justified and discriminatory.

      This investigation takes account of the fact that the EU and the US agreed in December 2007 on a compensation package in exchange of the loss of trade opportunities as a result of the US intention to withdraw its WTO commitments on gambling and betting services. Once this withdrawal occurs, the US would no longer be obliged to guarantee future access to its gambling and betting market, but this does not mean that it could disregard its obligations in respect of past trade.

      Link to European Commission ‘Fact Sheet’:

      http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/doc...doc_142695.pdf

      Source: Yahoo Finance, March 26, 2009

      Comment


      • #4
        Monte, Help me out. Without reading it all, what does it mean? I read the 1st one and gave up!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
          Monte, Help me out. Without reading it all, what does it mean? I read the 1st one and gave up!


          It means the EU is pissed and coming to talk to the USA again. And if something can't be worked out they are going to take them to WTO which the USA should lose again. Barney Frank is saying he's going to introduce a new bill after the break.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BettorsChat View Post
            Barney Frank is saying he's going to introduce a new bill after the break.

            I want Pinnacle back!

            Comment


            • #7
              It is our fucken money and they shouldn't be able to tell us what to spend it on!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                It is our fucken money and they shouldn't be able to tell us what to spend it on!
                hypocrites is what they are and I say democrats attach a gambling regulation bill at the last minute onto a bailout plan

                Comment

                Working...
                X