Home Team to Avoid the Sweep

[Ripple]

4 plays today..ill keep checking

Padres..-200
Balt ,,-103
Rangers ..-107
Seattle ..+121

[Lsufan]

Thanks Rip ... Good Luck

[dakota05]

Yo Rip Seattle won the 1st game on Thursday does it still count.This series is a 4 game series

[Ripple]

okay only 3 than..i didnt realise they played 4 games this early on..thanks..

Padres..-200
Balt ,,-103
Rangers ..-107

i just asked the guy who does this all the time..if a team is in a 4 game series and wins the first one but loses the next 2 at home does this fit into the system..

ill find out for you..great question buddy ..

[Carlg]

Thanks and Good Luck 2day

[jcindaville]

GL Ripple

[Kaptain]

Thanks Rip---gl to ya---kapt

[moondog22]

thanks for the info Rip

[Spark]

Thanks Buddy ... Good Luck today

[griffey_mojo]

GL today RIP!

[keawe]

Goodluck today Rip!!!!!!!!!!!

[TRUCKIN]

for anybody that cares
i tracked this system all last year
here were the results

this is for 3 game series only

at all star break
27-24 -.4*/interleague 10-5 +6.48*
total 37-29 +6.08*

for the whole year
57-51 -2.75*/interleague 10-5 +6.48*
total 67-56 +3.73*

if you are going to play this you have to play them all (including the high juice) or you will get burned

interleague did well!

gl
i will post records for 4 game series as well

[TRUCKIN]

here are results for 4 game series only

i think texas falls into this today

7-7 +.7*/interleague 1-0 +1*
total 8-7 +1.7*

gl

[savage1]

Does anyone know what this system has done in other years?
The reason I ask is that 3.73 units won for the entire season last year and based on 123 plays does not appear to be significant in itself; by my way of thinking this system would have to show some consistency in other years to be considered statistically valid and not merely considered chance for one season.
This is not criticism but just a question based on my knowledge of statistics.

[TRUCKIN]

Does anyone know what this system has done in other years?
The reason I ask is that 3.73 units won for the entire season last year and based on 123 plays does not appear to be significant in itself; by my way of thinking this system would have to show some consistency in other years to be considered statistically valid and not merely considered chance for one season.
This is not criticism but just a question based on my knowledge of statistics.

frankb/cheech would know or whover has a data base

i think it is somewhere around 55% through the years