I Thought Last Year Was Boring This One Was A Total Snoozer
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Worst Super Bowl Ever
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
This game reminded me of the New England- Denver playoff game this year when Denver got all the breaks and calls. I was on the wrong side that time. I was on the right side today.
Seattle lost it in the first half........after controlling the game and still be down 4 killed them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wrightmoveseattles made plays were negated by questionable calls. i agree pitt is better. when you deflate someones sail enough times and take a team completely out of a game via bad calls its easy to win a bet.
pitts is better without a doubt. just admit that it has nothing to do with being better...you had the right side. u know what i mean
yes I had the right side...I had the right side when I took Pitt -7.5 as well. They were the flat out crystal clear better team, but Vegas needed half your money, so they made the spread 4....that did the trick.
There is NO reason that they shouldn't have been favored by at least 7, and because of that, it was an easy call on MY part....but I do feel for the Seattle backers, cause I've been on the other side as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by savage1Wrightmove-Remember I am comparing it with every Superbowl ever played. The worst I would give it would be a C.
agreed on ever. i am not considering the games you have seen that i have not. the only way this game would have been better is if the bears played the steelers!!!bwh
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
its easy to grin when your ship comes in...
Comment
-
i disagree rook....I do not believe that they were flat out the crystal clear better team.....At no time did i feel Pitt was dominant.....Did they make the big plays when they had to? yes......But i think you are fortunate to win the -7.5 point bet.....The logic about the 4 that vegas put on it would have changed had the public thought that pitt was 7 points better....The money controls the line movement eventually....Originally posted by TheRookyes I had the right side...I had the right side when I took Pitt -7.5 as well. They were the flat out crystal clear better team, but Vegas needed half your money, so they made the spread 4....that did the trick.
There is NO reason that they shouldn't have been favored by at least 7, and because of that, it was an easy call on MY part....but I do feel for the Seattle backers, cause I've been on the other side as well.
Comment
-
Offensive Interference One Of The Worst Calls Ever
Especially When He Barely Nudged The Db, Most Db's And Wr's Do That Back N Forth With No Penalties Called.OVERALL OPINONS 1ST 2 WEEKS 136-121-52.9%
NBA 98-97 TOTALS 54-44 SPREADS 44-53 THRU 12/4
NFL 38-24 TOTALS 19-13 SPREADS 19-11 THRU 12/4
NEED 2 MAKE SOME G'S BAD N GET OUT OF THIS RUT

dont call my p.o.
Comment
-
Do we have to cry about officiating and fixes every fucking day?? I had seattle...I lost big fucking deal it happens...Give some credit to pitt and blame holmgren for shitty coaching at the end of both halves. Seattle had a chance to jump on them early and they didnt take advantage. There must be 5 fucking threads about the refs
Seattle played like shit.
Comment
-
Exactly, I agree with you completely.Originally posted by JBC13Do we have to cry about officiating and fixes every fucking day?? I had seattle...I lost big fucking deal it happens...Give some credit to pitt and blame holmgren for shitty coaching at the end of both halves. Seattle had a chance to jump on them early and they didnt take advantage. There must be 5 fucking threads about the refs
Seattle played like shit.MLB (2014): (3-4) -.9 units
Comment
-
i agree with the assessment about Holmgrens calling a poor game at the ends of the halfs....But i do also think that poor officiating cost them points and valuable momentum......I also give credit to Pitt for making big plays.....I do not think it is crying when the announcers came up with the same conclusions as many of us watching at home did.....It just stinks when the refs have a hand in the outcome of the game...Would the outcome have been different?? i do not know.....but i do know those were poor calls at critical times.....If that makes me a cry baby pussy then i guess i am....Originally posted by JBC13Do we have to cry about officiating and fixes every fucking day?? I had seattle...I lost big fucking deal it happens...Give some credit to pitt and blame holmgren for shitty coaching at the end of both halves. Seattle had a chance to jump on them early and they didnt take advantage. There must be 5 fucking threads about the refs
Seattle played like shit.
Comment
-
you had OVER BIG
AND YOU NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT PITTS
BUT IF YOU BET THEM ALSO GREAT FOR YOU
Originally posted by TheRookYeah I had Pittsburgh....and I claim to be a bit richer after this...but I'm sure as hell not going to gloat, and I sure as hell wouldn't have cried about it afterwards.
Sorry about the loss tonight....hope it gets better!
Comment
-
The rule is if any part of the ball touches the goalline it is a TD. The tip of the ball hit the goalline...it was the right call.....was that offensive pass interfernce?...i dont think so but he did push off...you cant say it was a bad call....just shouldnt have been called.Originally posted by TwoTonTonyi agree with the assessment about Holmgrens calling a poor game at the ends of the halfs....But i do also think that poor officiating cost them points and valuable momentum......I also give credit to Pitt for making big plays.....I do not think it is crying when the announcers came up with the same conclusions as many of us watching at home did.....It just stinks when the refs have a hand in the outcome of the game...Would the outcome have been different?? i do not know.....but i do know those were poor calls at critical times.....If that makes me a cry baby pussy then i guess i am....
Comment
Comment