Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some info from a Colorado Alum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some info from a Colorado Alum

    I live in Colorado and am an Alumni of the University of Colorado. I also used to cover the football team for the campus radio station when I went there (3 years ago). I figured I could provide some insight into the CU/Clemson game (at least on the CU side).

    I would highly suggest NOT wagering on Colorado. First, the interim head coach was on the local radio this morning and confirmed that it was highly unlikely that Klatt would play tonight at all. This means Cox will be playing the entire game as QB. Cox is an awful, awful Quarterback. Expect the Buffaloes to throw the ball under 15 times for the entire game (if they throw it more than that, uh oh).

    I can also say that, at least in my opinion, this Buffalo team has zero heart. There's a lot of talk locally of "maybe they'll play hard for staff". I don't expect that to be the case. They showed zero heart against hated Nebraska at home. They showed even less against Texas (and there was little doubt at this point that Barnett's future rested on them being competitive in this game). So if they wouldn't show up and play hard for their head coach, what makes anyone think they'll do so for his staff (who 95% of which will be fired after the game)?

    I should also mention that speaking to several people who used to cover the team with me a few years ago and are extremely homer-ish (for example, several of them loved CUs chances against Texas), there was not a single person that predicted CU would lose by less than double digits.

    I guess the question is: do you think that CU can cover the spread with zero offensive touchdowns? Unless Klatt can miraculously play, or the Clemson defense just gets run all over, there will be no offensive TDs for CU tonight.

    I know very little about Clemson. I'm also very afraid of how many people love them, as I tend to stay away in situations like this, but the line on this game should be Clemson -17 or so. And that's just based on the Buffs. If Clemson is better than I think, then perhaps it should be more.

    Anyway, just trying to share my info/insight from being an Alumni. Not a suggestion for a pick (though like I said, I would not suggest betting on CU - that doesn't neccisarily mean that I would play the game at all).

    Good luck to all who do play the game.

    -Nal

  • #2
    thanks for the info, still makes me wonder why vegas doesnt have this line higher
    Questions, comments, complaints:
    [email protected]

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the info

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks for the heads up, NAL ..... liked Clemson even before I read your post !!!! Thanks again

        Fenway
        MLB 2007 YTD: 34-25 +8.95 units

        Single Unit: 10-9 -1.34 units
        Double Unit: 18-13 +1.9 units
        Triple Unit: 4-3 +0.40 units
        Home Run Unit: 2-0 +8 units
        5* Grand Salami: 0-0


        Kruise: 17-7 (+11.10)
        NASCAR 2007: 1-0 +1 unit


        MLB 2006: 42-20 +28.43 units

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jcindaville
          thanks for the info, still makes me wonder why vegas doesnt have this line higher
          Because all newsletters pick Clemson to win by under 10...And most services on Colorado...
          Thanks for your info Nal
          Last edited by ChuckLazar; 12-27-2005, 05:26 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            thanks for the un biased info----appreciate it---kapt


            Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

            Comment


            • #7
              Good Stuff

              -Hercules Serbia
              Everybody dies, but not everyone lives.

              Comment


              • #8
                good stuff..thanks
                Ron Paul for president

                Comment

                Working...
                X